The committee showed that winning big games isn't as important as having fewer losses. Say we had not challenged ourselves and played Oklahoma. We would have had 1 loss, a big ten championship, and Alabama wouldn't even have been in conversation. So after seeing this, what's the point in scheduling any tough ooc opponents? It's obvious now, schedule weak teams, win the big ten (it's strong enough without ooc strength) and we're in. Only thing that matters is fewest losses. I'm ranting but it's a fact, had we not played Oklahoma, we'd be in.