The upcoming Big 10 title game will pit the consensus #1 vs the #2 team against each other, regardless of which poll or committee ranking you choose. Given the many different methods of deciding the national champion over the past decades, do you personally feel this game is the de-facto Natty? Why or why not? 

For me, I feel like this game would settle up to 90% of the argument that its winner is the true national champion. Would like to see the winner play against one more top team (TA&M, Georgia) like the old BCS, because the longer you drag out the playoffs, the more chance for volatility, especially in close games. Last year I think it worked pretty well for OSU that it really was the true best team because they convincingly beat several of their opponents, despite the long playoff road.