Before the season started, Ryan Day had clearly outlined his expectations for the Ohio State defense with one short sentence:
“We expect a top-ten defense.”
When asked about Day’s quote, Jim Knowles upped the ante:
“I wish he would have said top-five.”
Halfway through the 2022 college football season Knowles’ expectations seem to have been fulfilled; in the SP+ rankings, which combine success rates, drive production, and opponent adjustments have Ohio State ranked as the 5th best defense in all of college football.
This Michigan State game was a perfect showcase for the defense, as the starters exited only allowing 100 total yards, including negative rushing yardage.
| Time | Yard Line | Down | Distance | O Formation | D Package | Front | High | Type | Rush | Play | Player | Yards | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Quarter | |||||||||||||
| 15:00 | M35 | 1 | 10 | Pistol 3W 3x1 | 4-2-5 | Under | 2 | Run | Inside Zone | Eichenberg | 1 | Chambers (+1) and Eichenberg (+1) both shed blocks, giving the running back no room to run. | |
| 14:53 | M36 | 2 | 9 | Gun Twin Wing TE | 4-2-5 | Boundary | 2 | Pass | 5 | Streak | Brown | 20 | Ohio State runs a blitz, but this is released immediately. Brown (+1) has good coverage, but this is a perfect throw. I don't know if I would want to play this any differently. Coverage +1. |
| 14:16 | O44 | 1 | 10 | Pistol 3W Tight | 4-2-5 | Over | 3 | Run | Split Zone | Harrison | 3 | Harrison (+1), Cage (+0.5) and Vincent (+1) all get push in the backfield. Ransom (+0.5) is aggressive to help make the tackle. Tuimoloau gets pushed back on the double, but neither of the linemen move up to the second level, so he does his job. | |
| 14:01 | O41 | 2 | 7 | Gun Wing TE 3x1 | 4-2-5 | Under | 2 | Pass | 4 | Scramble Checkdown | Tuimoloau | 0 | Looks like Cover-6 pre-snap. Brown starts to blitz but then goes back to the flat. MSU slides protection toward Harrison on the right, so Tuimoloau (+2) is left to be doubled by the tight-end and running back in a seven-man protection, but goes right through him to flush out the QB. Harrison (+0.5) gets solid pressure on a double. WR drops the ball against soft coverage. Interesting as Burke shows off coverage, then presses late. Pressure +2. |
| 13:31 | O41 | 3 | 7 | Gun 3x1 | 4-2-5 | 3-3-5 Base Leo B | 3 | Pass | 4 | Post | Ransom | INT | Not a lot of pressure here. Good chip on Harrison (-0.5) from the tight end. That throws off Sawyer's rush. Hickman and Burke are bracketing the receiver, but Ransom (+2) reads this beautifully from the start. Spectacular interception. It looks like this is like a Cover-5, where the defense is in man-coverage besides the two deep safeties. I am not quite sure how Ransom reads this so early in the play, though, unless he is really supposed to be the only deep safety and I misidentified the coverage, or if MSU runs this play all the time. They know better than I do. Interception. |
| 10:50 | M25 | 1 | 10 | Gun Trips Bunch | 4-2-5 | Over | 1 | Read Option | Zone Read | Ransom | 8 | Tuimoloau is read. Play-calling -1, as reading JT allowed for MSU to essentially have six blockers for five defenders in the box. This play is why the read option was popular for so long. Eichenberg (+0.5) does a great job of getting outside the tackle and forcing him back inside for Hickman to make the tackle. | |
| 10:23 | M33 | 2 | 2 | Gun X Orbit | 4-2-5 | Over | 1 | Pass | 5 | Hickman | 0 | Eichenberg (+2) is nearly untouched, though not for lack of trying. Hickman (+1) aggressively gets in a great position, but the throw is off. Like everything about this play. Pressure +2. Coverage +1. Play-calling +1 to send Eichenberg. | |
| 10:15 | M33 | 3 | 2 | Gun Trips Bunch | 4-2-5 | Under | 2 | Pass | 4 | Spot Variation | Hickman | 0 | Holding on Tuimoloau (+1) who gets caught on a spin-move. I love Hickman's (+2) coverage here too. Punt. Pressure +1. Coverage +2. |
| 7:11 | M25 | 1 | 10 | Pistol Wings | 4-2-5 | Boundary | 2 | Run | Counter | Vincent | -5 | Vincent (+1.5) swims past the guard and makes the tackle in the backfield. MSU whiffed, but this is still a nice tackle in the backfield. Tackling +1. | |
| 6:46 | M20 | 2 | 15 | Gun Wing TE | 4-2-5 | Wide | 5 | Pass | 4 | Drag | Chambers | 5 | Chambers and Eichenberg are both there to make the tackle. Play-calling +0.5 to play conservatively here and force MSU to throw it short. |
| 6:16 | M25 | 3 | 10 | Gun Wing RB | 4-2-5 | Show Blitz | 3 | Pass | 4 | Improvisation Streak | Brown | 15 | RB and TE are in to chip, but then go out to pass. Even so, I would like to see more pressure here. Tuimoloau (-2) gets pancaked by a guard. Pass Interference on Brown (-2). It is tough to cover a receiver this long, but given that he starts ten-yards off the ball, my assumption is that his number one responsibility on this play is to avoid getting beat over the top. It happens anyway. Rough. Pressure (-2). Coverage (-2). |
| 5:56 | M40 | 1 | 10 | Pistol 3W Tight | 4-2-5 | Over | 1 | Pass | Split Flow | Hickman | 14 | Play-calling -1 as nobody is close to this. Harrison (-1) probably has to get off the chip faster here too. | |
| 5:23 | O46 | 1 | 10 | Pistol 3W | 4-2-5 | Show Blitz | 2 | RPO | RPO Slot Screen | McCallister | 6 | McCallister is playing 7-yards off the line of scrimmage, so MSU takes some easy yards. Play-calling -0.5. | |
| 5:07 | O40 | 2 | 4 | Gun 4W Stacks | 4-2-5 | Field | 2 | Pass | Fake Screen | Ransom | 0 | Ransom (+3) with some outstanding coverage down the sideline even with the fake screen and the tempo to throw off Ohio State. Play-calling -1 as Ohio State is not set. What a play by Ransom. Coverage +3. | |
| 4:58 | O40 | 3 | 4 | Pistol 3W Tight | 4-2-5 | Under | 2 | Run | Tight Zone | Sawyer | 5 | Sawyer (-1.5) needs to be attacking the inside gap considering he is blocked by the tight-end, and this defense usually plays to spill. I think he might get a bit greedy here, but the tight-end might have just controlled him, which would be worse. | |
| 4:51 | O35 | 1 | 10 | Pistol 3W | 4-2-5 | Over | 4 | RPO | RPO Slot Screen | McCallister | 4 | McCallister (+1.5) is 10-yards back here, but attacks this immediately to make the play after a modest gain. Tackling +1. | |
| 4:24 | O31 | 2 | 6 | Pistol 3W Tight | 4-2-5 | Under | 3 | Pass | 4 | PA Rollout Flood | Eichenberg | 0 | Eichenberg (+2) reads pass right away, covers his receiver until the QB commits to running, at which point he comes off the receiver and makes an outstanding tackle at the line of scrimmage. Tackling +1. Coverage +1. |
| 3:29 | O31 | 3 | 6 | Gun | 4-2-5 | Extreme Over Show Blitz | 0 | Pass | 6 | Sack | Hall | -7 | Play-calling +1 for the delayed blitz. Hall (+2) doesn't need it, though his win and Vincent's double team allows Eichenberg (+1) to help finish ti up. Pressure +2. Punt. |
| Second Quarter | |||||||||||||
| 14:23 | M24 | 1 | 10 | Pistol 3W Wing TE 3x1 | 4-2-5 | Under | 1 | Run | Wide Zone | Jean-Baptiste | 6 | Chambers (-0.5) and Vincent (-0.5) get successfully cut-block, which provide a lane for a good run. | |
| 14:09 | M30 | 2 | 4 | Pistol Wings | 4-2-5 | Field | 3 | Read Option | Power Read | Burke | 0 | Sawyer is read. Burke (+1) with an excellent tackle on the edge. Tackling +1. | |
| 13:24 | M31 | 3 | 4 | Pistol Wings | 4-2-5 | Boundary | 2 | Pass | 5 | Streak | Brown | 23 | Brown (-1) gets a bit handsy here, but this is an outstanding throw and catch. Needs to push into Reed's hip here, but it is a tough ask. Coverage -1. |
| 13:06 | P46 | 1 | 10 | Gun Tight X Jet | 4-2-5 | Under | 1 | Run | Jet Sweep | Burke | 5 | It feels like Burke (-1) has contain, and is supposed to push Reed back to the middle. I do like his willingness to take out a block in the backfield, but this is a loss or a shorter gain if he keeps contain. | |
| 12:59 | O41 | 2 | 5 | Pistol 3W Tight | 4-2-5 | Over | 2 | Run | Split Zone | Eichenberg | -10 | Eichenberg (+2, -1) probably shouldn't go underneath this block, but he would have gotten a TFL without the hold. Officials caught it this time, but the middle of the line is where they miss it often. | |
| 12:28 | M49 | 2 | 15 | Gun | 4-2-5 | Over | 4 | Pass | Swing Pass | Brown | 15 | Brown (+1, -2) plays this well up until the horse-collar tackle, which was unnecessary. Still, weird tackles never bother me too much, as it always feels like flukes more than things to worry about. Nice play otherwise. Tackling -2. | |
| 12:11 | O36 | 1 | 10 | Gun | 4-2-5 | Over | 4 | Pass | RPO Slot Screen | McCallister | 3 | McCallister (+1.5) again baits this RPO Screen, and makes initial contact in the backfield. Play-calling -0.5 as I think this is not an easy play for McCallister. Tackling +1. Coverage +0.5. | |
| 11:42 | O33 | 2 | 7 | Pistol 3W Tight | 4-2-5 | Wide | 3 | Pass | 4 | Spacing | Eichenberg | 0 | Eichenberg (+1) does a nice job of anticipating the throw and breaking up the pass, with Hickman (+0.5) coming hard over the top as well. Coverage +1.5. |
| 11:13 | O33 | 3 | 7 | Gun 4W | 4-2-5 | Show Blitz | 0 | Pass | Shallow Cross | Hall | 15 | Harrison (-2) gets called for hands to the face. Tuimoloau (+2) got held but it was not called. Hall (+1) helps finish the play after coverage holds up. Pressure +2. Coverage +0.5. | |
| 11:07 | O18 | 1 | 10 | Gun 3x1 | 4-2-5 | Under | 1 | Pass | 6 | Fade | Johnson | 18 | Johnson (+1.5) as the coverage is excellent. Incredible catch by Reed. Honestly might have been better than Harrison's catch later in the game, as this was off of his shoe-tops one-handed. Coverage +1.5. Touchdown. |
| 7:00 | M27 | 1 | 10 | Gun Tight | 4-2-5 | Over | 2 | Pass | 4 | Split Flow | Harrison | 0 | Harrison (+1) and McCallister (+1) stay patient here and help combine to force the incompletion. Coverage +1. Pressure +1. |
| 6:55 | M27 | 2 | 10 | Pistol 3W 3x1 | 4-2-5 | Over | 2 | Pass | RPO Hitch | Ransom | 6 | Ransom (+0.5) does a nice job of getting a piece of the receiver here, and Burke finishes it up. Play-calling -1 as the RPO takes some easy yardage. | |
| 6:27 | M33 | 3 | 4 | Gun Trips Bunch | 4-2-5 | Under | 2 | Pass | 4 | Tunnel Screen | Eichenberg | 0 | Eichenberg (+2) recognizes the screen immediately. Spectacular play. Coverage +2. Punt. |
| 1:14 | M36 | 1 | 10 | Gun 3x1 | 4-2-5 | Wide | 5 | Pass | 4 | Spacing | Harrison | -7 | Harrison (+2) has to make his way through three defenders, finishing the tackle with a bull-rush. He is the first to get to Thorne. Hall (+1.5) with a similarly good bull-rush. McCallister (+0.5) and Eichenberg (+0.5) with good coverage. Pressure +2. Coverage +1. |
| 0:46 | M29 | 2 | 17 | ABC | 4-2-5 | ABC | ABC | Penalty | False Start | None | -5 | N/A | |
| 0:32 | M24 | 2 | 22 | Pistol 3W | 4-2-5 | Over | 5 | RPO | RPO Slot Screen | McCallister | 8 | McCallister (-1) misses the tackle here, and Eichenberg finishes it up. Tackling -1. | |
| Third Quarter | |||||||||||||
| 9:46 | M25 | 1 | 10 | Gun Wing TE | 4-2-5 | Under | 4 | Run | Sweep | Eichenberg | 2 | Eichenberg (+1) is able to control his block easily and makes the stop. | |
| 9:29 | M27 | 2 | 8 | Gun Twin Wing TE | 4-2-5 | Boundary | 3 | Pass | 4 | Sack | Cage | -7 | Nice stunt by Cage (+2) and Vincent (+1). Vincent gets free, but Cage finishes after getting the attention of three-linemen. Tuimoloau (+1) also helps push Thorne up in the pocket. Pressure +2. |
| 8:40 | M20 | 3 | 15 | Gun Y Flex | 4-2-5 | Wide | 5 | Pass | 4 | Sack | Hall | -10 | Tuimoloau (+2) is held pretty blatantly. Harrison (+1) with good pressure on the outside as well. Eichenberg (+1) also pushes Thorne out of the pocket, and Hall (+1) is able to shed the block in time to make the sack. Pressure (+2) |
| 2:58 | M28 | 1 | 10 | Pistol 3W | 4-2-5 | Under | 2 | Run | Inside Zone | Williams | 2 | Tyleik Williams (+1) gets good push. Eichenberg (+1) makes a good play here. | |
| 2:44 | M30 | 2 | 8 | Pistol Wings | 4-2-5 | 4-3 Boundary | 2 | Run | Counter | Martinez | 1 | Martinez (+1) is in a perfect spot and makes a nice tackle. Tackling +1. | |
| 2:10 | M31 | 3 | 7 | Gun | 4-2-5 | Show Blitz | 0 | Pass | 4 | Streak | Proctor | 0 | Proctor was there, but this might get complete if the throw is better. This is just a tough throw. Punt. |
| End of Charting |
Much like the offense, it is sometimes hard to take away much from a game against an opponent like that. In this one, there were a couple of notable moments. For one, I think most people are concerned about the corner play, but outside of a couple of moments from Cameron Brown, I think it was fine in this one. He has been mostly solid this year, so I am not too concerned with one game, especially defending Jayden Reed all game, who will be the best receiver on Ohio State’s schedule until Michigan, maybe until the playoffs.
Also, their adjustments were outstanding. While it wasn’t completely obvious until rewatching, after Reed scored a touchdown with 11:07 remaining in the second quarter, the starters held Michigan State to -10 yards until the end of the third quarter. That is a third of a football game without allowing positive yardage. I am not going into every game expecting that dominance, but sheesh.
That is also why, if you were expecting negative grades, you are going to be disappointed. Here is the defensive chart:
| Player | + | - | T | Percentage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| defensive line | |||||
| zach harrison | 5.5 | 3 | 2.5 | 64.7 | Not his best game, though not bad by any means |
| Michael hall | 5.5 | 0 | 5.5 | 100.0 | Probably the best graded game I have charted pe-snap. |
| taron vincent | 3.5 | 0.5 | 3 | 87.5 | MSU throws a lot more than most of the teams OSU has played so far, so this was never going to be a high number. |
| jt tuimoloau | 8 | 2 | 6 | 80.0 | A bit of a wildcard. He seems to have one bust per game, but he was constantly held in this game. Super disruptive, and the most likely defensive end to become an elite pass-rusher. |
| jack sawyer | 0 | 1.5 | -1.5 | 0.0 | Against this offensive line, I would have liked to see more, though many of those snaps were probably in garbage time. I didn't see the Jack package out much today, and Knowles only moved the Jack in an unusual spot once throughout the entire game. |
| javonte jean-baptiste | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | Did not chart |
| tyleik williams | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0 | Nice play toward the end of the charting. |
| jerron cage | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 100.0 | Nice little game with Hall limited. |
| ty hamilton | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart. |
| jaden mckenzie | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart. |
| caden curry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart. |
| total | 26 | 7 | 19 | 78.8 | This group continues to be excellent. Selfishly I want to see the defensive ends pick up a few more sacks, just so the stats reflect how dominant they've been. |
| linebacker | |||||
| tommy eichenberg | 15 | 1 | 14 | 93.8 | Best game I have seen him play. He better be an All-American at this rate. |
| steele chambers | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 66.7 | On the other hand, Chambers was almost invisible. Still, this ratio is good for a linebacker. Just surprised he didn't pop more. |
| cody simon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart |
| chip trayanum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart |
| total | 16 | 1.5 | 14.5 | 91.4 | Eichenberg is involved in almost every play. |
| secondary | |||||
| cameron brown | 2 | 5 | -3 | 28.6 | Rough game for him. The coverage wasn't that bad for two of the plays. It still needs to be better though. |
| denzel burke | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0 | Decent game. Only minus was in run-support. |
| josh proctor | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart |
| lathan ransom | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0 | As much as I like Proctor, it is hard to take Ransom off the field right now. I think they will still rotate. |
| tanner mccallister | 4.5 | 1 | 3.5 | 81.8 | Really only targetted on that RPO Slot Screen. |
| ronnie hickman | 3.5 | 0 | 3.5 | 100.0 | Another mistake-free game for him. He's been incredibly reliable. |
| cameron martinez | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0 | Nice tackle in run support late. |
| jk johnson | 1.5 | 0 | 1.5 | 100.0 | Even though he gave up a touchdown, I thought the coverage was outstanding on it. Wasn't targetted the rest of the game. |
| jyaire brown | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart |
| Ryan Turner | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Did not chart |
| total | 19.5 | 7 | 12.5 | 73.6 | Cameron Brown had an uncharacteristically rough game. Burke played solid. Safeties were great. Ransom is really turning into something special. |
| metrics | |||||
| pressure | 16 | 2 | 14 | 88.9 | Hard to do better than this. Didn't really give Thorne much time at all. |
| coverage | 18 | 3 | 15 | 85.7 | There has been a lot of talk about struggling corners, but the coverage for Ohio State has been pretty good all year. Though, this was probably the best passing team they've faced. |
| tackling | 6 | 3 | 3 | 66.7 | Unspectacular |
| Play calling | 2.5 | 5 | -2.5 | 33.3 | This was the most vanilla Ohio State has played this season. |
The defensive line had about their usual day, but that has been outstanding this year. Just a week after I had said that Mike Hall had cooled off after his huge first two games, he goes out and has a 2.5 sack day in only 7 snaps. It wasn’t quite as dominant as the stat sheet showed. In a couple of those sacks, the quarterback was first pressured by someone without an official sack this year, first Zach Harrison, then J.T. Tuimoloau. Harrison didn’t play as well as he usually does, but the fact that he hasn’t been credited with a sack this year is bizarre. I have charted a couple of plays where he has tackled the quarterback in the backfield during a pass. Yet neither were even counted as TFLs. Maybe the QB barely got back to the line? I have no idea. He has been so snake bit the past couple of years with good pressure but no stats to show for it. J.T. is starting to be in the same position as well. Anyone who watched the game on Saturday could tell you that he was abusing the Michigan State tackle, and yet has not recorded a sack on the year. Last year, I thought he ran into a couple of sacks by sheer luck or after someone like Harrison had forced the quarterback to take off. This year, he is the one getting the pressure only to push the quarterback into the waiting arms of a teammate.
Of course, it is worth noting that of all Ohio State’s 14 sacks this year – and I will need to double check this before next week’s write-up to let you know – were completed faster than the NFL median sack time of 4.17 s. This means that opponents are game planning to an extreme degree around not holding the ball at all against Ohio State and trying to make a living throwing quick passes. Michigan State, for example, ran only 1 play-action the entire day. Toledo had 2 play-actions. Rutgers had 3 play-actions, and two of them were screens. The third was a TE flat. So far, it hasn’t worked. Oklahoma State had a similar problem at times last year until they played a team that had longer developing plays in Oklahoma, where Caleb Williams was promptly sacked six times. I don’t know if Ohio State will play a team that would be equivalent to that, but Penn State and Maryland are the two most likely to attempt to do this.
The linebackers played their usual too, though it was far more lopsided than usual. Even though he only finished with 8 tackles, he graded out higher than he has at any point this season. He was everywhere in this game and is so disruptive against the run. I think PFF had him as the best defender in the country against the run, and that feels entirely accurate. Still, for his play this year, he is vastly underrated around the country, though I certainly don’t need to tell you that.
The safeties are still playing better than any group I can remember except for the 2016 group. McCallister caught on pretty quickly to the RPO Slot Screen, and started to bait it as the game went along. The first time MSU ran it, they got seven. Then they got four. Then they got three. He continued to make adjustments to that play-call as the game went on. Ransom had another outstanding day. While the interception was an outstanding play, I think I was more impressed with the pass breakup along the sideline. While it was hard to see on first viewing, he and the rest of the Ohio State defense were not ready when this ball was snapped. For him to recognize his coverage responsibility, get to the sideline and break up a good pass was just exceptional. There is a real case to be made that he has been the best safety on the team this year, which, based on this play last year, I would have never expected.
Speaking of the defense’s performance for the year, here are their aggregate scores so far in 2022:
| Player | + | - | T | Percentage | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| defensive line | |||||
| Zach harrison | 22.5 | 6 | 16.5 | 78.9 | He is still consistently playing well, though I am not sure it is as good as last year. Though, I will say that he started last season better than he finished. |
| michael hall | 23.5 | 2.5 | 21 | 90.4 | The surprise of the defensive line so far. Interestingly, he has disappeared in a couple games, where in the others he has been the most dominant player on the field. As long as he can maintain relative health, he will continue to be one of the biggest upgrades over last year. |
| taron vincent | 15 | 6 | 9 | 71.4 | I graded him better last year, but I was wrong. I was much too soft against the pass rush, and most of the negatives went against the linebackers. This year, with the defensive line being responsible for more in the interior run game, I am seeing more negatives. Still, I like his play a lot more this year. |
| j.t. tuimoloau | 27 | 5 | 22 | 84.4 | His positives are up from last year, but so are his negatives. This makes sense with the increased playing time. Still, he looks like a much better player than last year. As I said, I was much too soft last year on the defensive-line. |
| jack sawyer | 25.5 | 9 | 16.5 | 73.9 | Same story as all the linemen. He has been better than last year, but has not been scoring as well. He does seem to be a bit of a step down from JT and Harrison, however. |
| javonte jean-baptiste | 10.5 | 1 | 9.5 | 91.3 | He has genuinely played pretty well, but he really only has value as a situational pass rusher for this defense right now. Still, he is probably the best pass rusher on the team, so it is a role that works for him. |
| tyler friday | 5 | 1 | 4 | 83.3 | Has not played much this year. |
| tyleik williams | 15 | 6.5 | 8.5 | 69.8 | Took a step back from last year, but his huge start was always going to be hard to replicate. |
| ty hamilton | 7.5 | 0.5 | 7 | 93.8 | Probably needs one more year of putting on weight. He has played enough where this is a low amount of points, though he is good at doing his assignment. |
| jerron cage | 7.5 | 5.5 | 2 | 57.7 | Step back from last year, though at this point last season he hadn't done much at all. He came on after the BYE week last year, so hopefully something similar can happen this year. |
| jaden mckenzie | 1.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 75.0 | Very limited action again. |
| caden curry | 4 | 1 | 3 | 80.0 | Flashed early, but it hasn't materialized in more playing time. I don't know who he would play over, though. |
| total | 164.5 | 44.5 | 120 | 78.7 | This grade is technically worse than last year, but this group has played much better. While LJ is still there, the new direction from Knowles has been a huge help. |
| linebacker | |||||
| tommy eichenberg | 52 | 7 | 45 | 88.1 | Probably the MVP of the defense, and also the most improved player. I think he still has the record for the worst game I have graded for his Oregon performance last year. Now he is the best player on the team. What a year. |
| steele chambers | 19 | 9 | 10 | 67.9 | While this doesn't seem great, it was better than Chambers played last year. I think he has still been solid all season. |
| cody simon | 11 | 1 | 10 | 91.7 | This grading is almost all from a single game. Still, his tackling issues from last year are now almost completely gone. |
| chip trayanum | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | I am intrigued by his time in garbage time, but I haven't graded him this year. Seems like a great athlete though. If he figures it out, he could be an incredible asset. |
| teradja mitchell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Haven't seen him at linebacker this year. |
| palaie gaoteote | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0 | Fumble recovery for his points on the year. |
| reid carrico | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Special Teams |
| cj hicks | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Special Teams |
| gabe powers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Special Teams |
| total | 84 | 17 | 67 | 83.2 | Easily the most improved group on the team. They went from probably the worst group on the team to arguably the best. What a turnaround. |
| secondary | |||||
| cameron brown | 10.5 | 9 | 1.5 | 53.8 | He is holding up okay, but isn't playing as well as he did last year. 50% is a fine score for a corner, though. |
| denzel burke | 9 | 17 | -8 | 34.6 | Big dip from last year. He is really the only player from this year who seems to be doing worse than last year. Interestingly enough, though, he has been targetted much less. |
| josh proctor | 7.5 | 2 | 5.5 | 78.9 | He has played well, but he seems to be the boundary safety against rushing-first teams. So far this year, that has meant a start against ND (though he was pulled), Ark St, Wisconsin, and Rutgers. Only three full games so far. He's played well in that time period. |
| lathan ransom | 17 | 3 | 14 | 85.0 | I need to clarify; Eichenberg is the most improved from the beginning of my grading, but Ransom is the most improved from last year. Ransom had difficulty tackling and defending in coverage last year. This year, he has been nothing short of spectacular, even splitting time with Proctor. He's been great this year. |
| tanner mccallister | 15 | 5.5 | 9.5 | 73.2 | Really solid at the nickel position. He made me nervous after getting beat twice in the Notre Dame game, but he has been great ever since. |
| ronnie hickman | 14.5 | 4 | 10.5 | 78.4 | I criticised him a bit last year for being merely solid. He always did his job, but little else. This year, he has taken the next step and is one of the best safeties I can remember Ohio State having. |
| kourt williams | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Have not charted him this year, which has surprised me. |
| cameron martinez | 7 | 3 | 4 | 70.0 | He has been plenty good when he has been in, but I don't think that McCallister can be taken off the field right now. Still, I think the future of that nickel spot is bright. He looks much more comfortable tackling than he did last year, which was his biggest issue. |
| jk johnson | 8 | 4 | 4 | 66.7 | Good first year of consistent playing time. Seems pretty comfortable in coverage. I don't think he is much worse than the current starters, which is encouraging. |
| jordan hancock | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | I might be more excited to see Hancock come back than I am for JSN to come back. I think receivers are in a good spot, but the corners could use another guy. |
| jyaire brown | 3 | 0.5 | 2.5 | 85.7 | Limited playing time, but he has played really well. Not usual for a true freshman to play this well. |
| sonny styles | 0 | 5 | -5 | 0 | Rough start. He is supremely talented and it is a great sign that they are already getting him playing time, but a gap-run heavy team like Wisconsin is a tough introduction to college football. Physically he looks the part, which is shocking for a high schooler. He still has a ways to go before he gets regular playing time. |
| total | 91.5 | 53 | 38.5 | 63.3 | This safeties group is the best I have seen at Ohio State with the possible exception of 2016. |
| metrics | |||||
| pressure | 79.5 | 6 | 73.5 | 93.0 | Much better than last year. I have been timing each of the snaps, and rarely does Ohio State give more than 2.5 seconds to throw. Considering that the median sack takes around 4.16 seconds, Ohio State has been outstanding in this department. |
| coverage | 45.5 | 25.5 | 20 | 64.1 | About as good as last year, though almost in the opposite ways. The corners have not been as good downfield, but there is nowhere near as many short or intermediate throws made on this defense. The easy stuff isn't there anymore, though some shots are available. |
| tackling | 41 | 18 | 23 | 69.5 | Much better than last year, when they finished under 50%. Night and Day. |
| Play Calling | 38 | 33 | 5 | 53.5 | Last year this number was 31.3% after a full season. I don't think Knowles has even really used most of his tricks. He has been keeping things pretty simple. |
While I think it is somewhat intuitive how this group has performed thus far, it is probably easier when given a comparison. So, I also have last year’s midseason defensive chart here as well:
| Player | + | - | T | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| defensive line | ||||
| zach harrison | 25 | 3.5 | 21.5 | 87.7 |
| tyreke smith | 18 | 1.5 | 16.5 | 92.3 |
| haskell garrett | 32.5 | 11.5 | 21 | 73.9 |
| antwuan jackson | 15.5 | 3.5 | 12 | 81.6 |
| taron vincent | 15 | 1 | 14 | 93.8 |
| javonte jean-baptiste | 14 | 2 | 12 | 87.5 |
| jt tuimoloau | 19 | 1 | 18 | 95.0 |
| jack sawyer | 22 | 4 | 18 | 84.6 |
| tyleik williams | 29 | 2 | 27 | 93.5 |
| ty hamilton | 10 | 1 | 9 | 90.9 |
| cormontae hamilton | 2.5 | 0 | 2.5 | 100.0 |
| jacolbe cowan | 5 | 4 | 1 | 55.6 |
| jerron cage | 4 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 88.9 |
| darrion henry-young | 1 | 0 | 1 | 100.0 |
| Michael hall | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0 |
| jaden mckenzie | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0 |
| total | 221.5 | 39.5 | 182 | 84.9 |
| teradja mitchell | 21 | 16 | 5 | 56.8 |
| cody simon | 23 | 15 | 8 | 60.5 |
| tommy eichenberg | 23 | 16.5 | 6.5 | 58.2 |
| dallas gant | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 100.0 |
| palaie gaoteote | 3 | 4 | -1 | 42.9 |
| steele chambers | 22 | 3 | 19 | 88.0 |
| k'vaughn pope | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0 |
| cade kacherski | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0 | 50.0 |
| reid carrico | 0.5 | 2 | -1.5 | 20.0 |
| ryan batsch | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0 |
| total | 101.5 | 63 | 38.5 | 61.7 |
| secondary | ||||
| cameron brown | 13.5 | 10 | 3.5 | 57.4 |
| denzel burke | 22.5 | 7 | 15.5 | 76.3 |
| josh proctor | 2 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 80.0 |
| lathan ransom | 10.5 | 17 | -6.5 | 38.2 |
| bryson shaw | 8.5 | 11.5 | -3 | 42.5 |
| Marcus williamson | 21.5 | 1.5 | 20 | 93.5 |
| sevyn banks | 11.5 | 7 | 4.5 | 62.2 |
| lejond cavazos | 1.5 | 7.5 | -6 | 16.7 |
| ryan watts | 5 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 76.9 |
| cameron martinez | 21 | 15 | 6 | 58.3 |
| jk johnson | 1.5 | 2 | -0.5 | 42.9 |
| marcus hooker | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 66.7 |
| jantzen dunn | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 100.0 |
| demario mccall | 8 | 1 | 7 | 88.9 |
| jordan hancock | 2 | 0 | 2 | 100.0 |
| ronnie hickman | 28.5 | 14.5 | 14 | 66.3 |
| craig young | 10 | 2.5 | 7.5 | 80.0 |
| kourt williams | 4 | 0.5 | 3.5 | 88.9 |
| andre turrentine | 0.5 | 1 | -0.5 | 33.3 |
| total | 173.5 | 100.5 | 73 | 63.3 |
| metrics | ||||
| pressure | 105.5 | 18 | 87.5 | 85.4 |
| coverage | 76.5 | 38.5 | 38 | 66.5 |
| tackling | 41 | 40 | 1 | 50.6 |
| play calling | 16 | 26 | -10 | 38.1 |
So, at least by comparison, the defensive line and secondary are playing about as well as they did last year, with the linebackers playing much better, though I kind of disagree with my own rankings from last year. First, while it seemed like the defensive linemen were winning their one-on-ones, they were likely making some mistakes that I was instead putting on the linebackers, so while their score seems pretty good, some of the negatives that the linebackers took should have absolutely been re-routed to the defensive line in hindsight. Furthermore, I was not as methodical in measuring pressure last season, so some of their pressure grades may be inflated. Given these considerations, I would take the play of the 2022 defensive linemen and linebackers over their 2021 counterparts.
The secondary is interesting, as though the safeties have drastically improved (look at Lathan Ransom), the corners have seen their production dip, resulting in the exact same score as last year. Honestly, not all of this was the fault of the corners. Last year, both Brown and Burke were usually just relied on to not get beat deep. They were willing to give up underneath routes, especially when they were in Cover 3. When that would happen, I would ding the play-caller, though I wasn’t as strict for this early on in the year. Still, one of the reasons why last year’s defense had a much worse play-calling score was the constant giving up of short-yardage passes. This year, those passes are nowhere to be found. A shift in defensive philosophy has put the corners on islands, and so far, they haven’t been up to the task. I am relatively bullish in Burke and Brown down the stretch; it is relatively easy to teach a corner who is already in consistently good position to be a little better with their ball skills. It is much harder to teach a guy who has the inverse problem and can’t stay within seven yards of a receiver. If they can just get slightly better, this score will increase quite a bit. Also, I used to chart the backups as well, so they would often pad the stats in garbage time.
Before finishing up, I thought it might be fun to see how this defense has been stacking up against the previous defenses since Urban Meyer took over in 2012. In particular, I wanted to see how they looked using the percentage of opponent averages allowed stat that the College Football Nerds YouTube channel have popularized. I like the stat because it controls for the level of competition a team plays. The general idea is that if you allow 80% of your opponent averages for YPC, then you will likely give up 4 YPC against a team that normally runs for 5 YPC. So, to clear it up, lower is better. I did remove the garbage time data for Wisconsin as it is was an outlier of the data. Considering how beat up Ohio State was, their second/third team against Wisconsin’s starters is not something I would expect to play much of a role in predicting future performance. I also through in Michigan’s defense this year, of which I have been tracking.
Here is how this defense compares to the rest:
| Team | Percentage of Opponents' YPC Allowed | Percentage of Opponents' YPA Allowed |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Ohio State | 61.2 | 83.6 |
| 2021 ohio state | 83.3 | 96.1 |
| 2020 ohio state | 82.7 | 102.8 |
| 2019 ohio state | 66.1 | 74.6 |
| 2018 ohio state | 98.8 | 99.3 |
| 2017 ohio state | 64.5 | 81.7 |
| 2016 ohio state | 79.5 | 74.2 |
| 2015 ohio state | 73.2 | 81.7 |
| 2014 ohio state | 80.8 | 83.8 |
| 2013 ohio state | 81.2 | 97.8 |
| 2012 ohio state | 79.4 | 92.7 |
| 2022 michigan | 75.2 | 79.8 |
Now it is early, and it is worth mentioning that last year’s defense was looking pretty good by midseason as well, but this defense is looking like one of Ohio State’s best of the decade. Are they the best? I wouldn’t say so yet. First, they are kind of in a three-way tie with 2017 and 2019 for being the best defense of the past 11 years. 2019 wasn’t quite as good against the run, but it was a good bit better against the pass.
The 2017 unit is almost the exact same defense as 2022’s version according to this metric and is a fascinating defense on its own. In fact, halfway through its own season, that defense had allowed 56.1% of opponents’ YPC per game and 70.8% of opponents’ YPA per game. For reference, that was better than 2021 Georgia. Then, they went to Iowa City. I don’t remember anything after that.
What should we worry about for the rest of the season?
Unknowns about this defense’s ability to scale. Last year, after Matt Barnes took over, the defense was essentially just a patchwork collection of schemes and fundamentals that were installed in a matter of weeks. Due to this, they were actually pretty capable against the middle part of their schedule against some offenses that really weren’t that bad. Michigan State, Purdue, Penn State, and Maryland all had decent offenses last year, and they couldn’t do much against Ohio State. However, as soon as Ohio State had to play top ten offenses like Utah and Michigan, they couldn’t hold up. They were like the defensive equivalent of the Ed Warriner 2016 offense, when they would put up 60 like nothing against some teams and then get score one offensive touchdown against Michigan in regulation before getting shut out by Clemson. They were in some ways a poor man’s version of Don Brown’s defenses at Michigan, when they would look like the best defense in the country before running into Ryan Day’s offenses.
Some defenses scale well, and others do not. If this defense does scale, then we probably have nothing to worry about. Until they play a top ten offense though, they won’t really know. And that won’t be until the Saturday after Thanksgiving.
What should we not worry about for the rest of the season?
The second half of the 2021 Michigan game. Jim Knowles came into this year as a great mid-game adjuster. While it might be a little too early to draw many conclusions, this trend seems to be continuing. Notre Dame was shut out in the second half. Toledo, Ark State, and Rutgers all scored less in the second half than the first. Even Michigan State and Wisconsin were held to less in the second half while the starters were in. And while it wouldn’t look like much of a trend without that caveat, I do think it is important to mention. The defense has gotten better throughout each game that they’ve played thus far. On top of that, the run defense has been as good as it has been in the past decade. I am not saying it can’t happen, but I will be shocked if Michigan runs like they did last year against Ohio State this year. JJ McCarthy will have to win the game for them through the air, for better or worse.
What should we get excited about for the rest of the season?
This has been a bit of a sup-plot throughout the beginning of the season, but Jim Knowles really hasn’t done a ton of different things regarding blitzing, which was his big hallmark at Oklahoma State. His biggest help has just been getting each level of the defense on the same page and running a variety of coverages while disguising looks. Furthermore, in most of these early games, he really has not been mixing it up much at all compared to what I was used to seeing last year with him. I absolutely think he has been working on different blitzes with the team, but they haven’t had to use it at all. I haven’t really seen a corner/safety blitz this year, which was relatively common for him in the past. I think this defense has another level it can get to against the premier opponents on the schedule, but I do not think they are going to get too exotic until they absolutely need it. Having that in their back pocket is going to be huge, and I think you might see it in a big spot against Michigan.
I know I have talked a lot about Michigan, but at the midpoint of this season, that game seems to be set for a collision course.