The committee is taking criticism from all parts of the country for various reasons: OSU not playing enough games, screwing Cincinnati for not playing in 3 weeks, not dropping Florida for terrible losses, keeping 2 loss teams ahead of undefeated teams.

Their criteria for the rankings is a mystery to all. Most just want to see the 4 best teams in the playoffs. I know most on this board hate Clemson and Dabo but what if they lose another close OT game to ND? They will have 2 losses so everyone would say they are out just like Florida. The committee is going to reward OSU despite playing only 6 games but the eye test tells the committee OSU is one of the 4 best teams. If they do this then should they reward Clemson for being one of the 4 best teams. Clemson is clearly better than A&M, Cinci, Florida, ISU despite 2 losses. Should the committee reward the most deserving teams like Cinci/A&M or the better team?

MOD EDIT: Closed until you fix title