Spring Practice Offense Observations: The Pistol and Braxton Miller

By Ross Fulton on April 18, 2013 at 2:00p
11 Comments

With the spring game in the books it is time to assess where the Buckeyes stand as a team. Last week I provided my defensive observations. I now turn my attention to the offense.

Today I focus on the latest addition to the Buckeyes' repertoire, as well as Braxton Miller's growth. Next week I will examine the remaining offensive positions.

Picking Up Right where we left off

Ohio State did not need to start spring practice installing the offense from scratch. Instead, the return of 10 starters has provided the Buckeye offense the luxury of continuing full steam ahead from 2012.

For instance, in their first practice, the Buckeyes utilized much of their full complement of base plays, including an assortment of passing combinations.

The goal has thus not been installation. Instead, it has largely been scheme expansion and individual improvement. While these goals have largely been accomplished, OSU leaves spring practice still seeking to fill the right tackle position. This will remain the offense's biggest question mark entering this fall.

Guns Up

Much was made this spring of the Buckeyes implementing the Diamond formation. But the far more lasting addition is the Pistol formation, of which the Diamond is but one variant.

Last year, the tailback would often line up behind the quarterback and then shift to one side.

The Buckeyes are now running plays directly from the pistol. This allows Ohio State to further vary its tempo. It also does not require the offense to declare its tailback strength. 

At the same time, the pistol is not a new framework for the Buckeye offense. The Buckeyes can instead run their same base plays, requiring little additional practice time.

For instance, during the spring game, Ohio State ran its base tight zone play. From the pistol they ran it just as NFL teams did so successfully last season, namely having the H-back block back across the formation and bluff blocking the defensive end before heading as a lead blocker in the alley.

This provides Braxton Miller a lead blocker on the edge when he keeps.

Ohio State also ran power to the formation's strength. Further, the Buckeyes demonstrated a tendency this spring to use the pistol for its "Rocket" tempo after a long pass play. Rocket tempo is simply when the the Buckeyes immediately rush to the line and run a play as soon as the offense is set. From the pistol, that play is generally a frontside inside zone play – 16 or 17 in the playbook – seeking to gain additional yards.

But it appears that the Buckeyes see the same primary benefit that NFL offenses do — namely play action. The pistol has two benefits in this regard. The running back's positioning presents a better downhill fake to the defense than is possible from the shotgun. The pistol also can create better timing to allow routes to develop. 

The upshot is that during the spring game the Buckeyes used the pistol with much play-action success. Miller's first completion was a 46-yard pass to Evan Spencer on a post-dig route with play action from the pistol.  

OSU also repeatedly ran quick hitch routes off the inside zone play fake to Devin Smith. Because of these play-action possibilities, I fully expect the Pistol to be a new complement to Urban Meyer and Tom Herman's Ohio State offense this fall.

The Song Remains the Same

The Buckeyes' offense otherwise reflected the same base tenets of a Meyer offense — namely using 1) QB reads, 2) QB lead runs, and 3) misdirection to provide the offense with an arithmetic advantage to run traditional zone and power plays.

The spring game, while being largely a passing scrimmage, reflected Meyer's base passing plays, such as H-option, follow, follow-pivot, and four verticals. 

Keeping it Low-Key

The key, therefore, is for the Buckeyes' experienced players to further grow and fit within the offense. This of course starts with Braxton Miller.

Miller's mechanical improvement was immediately noticeable. He has tightened his footwork. He has also gotten his elbow higher in his release, leading to a more accurate, tighter spiral. Miller is clearly more comfortable in his reads and timing, leading to better decision-making and better timing with his throws.

Miller's biggest key remains not pressing and instead getting into the flow of the game. This was evident during the spring game. Reminiscent of games last year, Miller came out pressing. This is reflected in a small point — his pocket awareness. When Miller is tight or pressing, he tends to get "lead feet." He sits in one spot, stays in the pocket too long, and does not feel the rush. This leads to coverage sacks (sacks 2.5 seconds and more after the snap). This is also why Meyer pointed out last postseason that, despite Miller's immense rushing talents, he was not a good scrambler. 

Yet once Miller settled down during the spring game, his pocket movement was much better and improved over last season. His feet kept moving, he evaded the rush, and he was willing to scramble when needed. And his comfort level as a passer correspondingly improved. Miller completed all manner of passes, went through his progressions, and properly checked down to third, fourth and fifth options.

The upshot is that Miller's biggest improvement can come from staying within the game and not pressing. This will benefit not only his passing, but also his reads in the run game, which are just important to this offense. All too often last season Miller pre-determined his reads. He either decided that he was going to give because he wanted to rely upon the running backs, or determined to keep because he wanted to make a play.

If Miller continues the improvement of his footwork in the pocket, he can rely upon his improved arm angle and natural ability to take the next step forward.

11 Comments

Comments

tussey's picture

thanks ross, another great read

Buckeye_in_SEC_country's picture

Nice write up.  I still haven't been able to watch the spring game.  For some reason BTN isn't on our cable package.  I guess I need to check into that.  I was very impressed with CJ's ability to run the read plays.  I was also happy to see some jet sweeps and misdirections in there too.  I believe our offense will be much better this year.

Buckeyevstheworld's picture

"YOLO" = I'm about to do something extremely ignorant/stupid & I need an excuse to do it.

FitzBuck's picture

I was very impressed with his ball location in the spring game.  There were one or two jump balls but for the most part he hit runners in stride and showed good touch.  Maybe I'm seeing it because I want to see it but I really think his work with Whitfield really paid off.  

Fitzbuck | Toledo - Ohio's right armpit | "A troll by any other name is still a troll".

Hovenaut's picture

Nice breakdown Ross. Thought Brax looked more fluid throwing, without comprising his athleticism. It's evident his off season work is paying off.

Hate Week runneth over

Buckeye_TilIdie's picture

Braxton definetly has improved, and that is great news for buckeyenation, if he can become more consistent (which I think will happen with more reps) this team will be a force, we didn't even get chance to see total package because of the black jersey, Spence, and Washington, looked good, but I'm not sure some of those would've been sacks in a real game on Braxton.

Punks jump up to get beat down.

MediBuck's picture

Thanks again for the analysis, Ross.
A quick question that I've always had regarding the pistol:
- If we can utilize all the same base runs as the standard Meyer offense (with no additional training needed for the OL or WRs), and we get the added benefit of not declaring the direction of the play pre-snap (not to mention, some pundits believe the pistol is better for play action than normal shotgun), why even bother lining up in standard shotgun formation with the back to one side? In other words, what are the downsides, if any, of going pistol?

Sorry for the general question. As a Nevadan, I've watched Ault run his quirky offense for many years before it went mainstream, and am embarrassed that I still don't know a whole lot about it.

"There is a force that makes us all brothers, no one goes his way alone." --Woody Hayes

buckeyeblur5's picture

"why even bother lining up in standard shotgun formation with the back to one side?  In other words, what are the downsides, if any, of going pistol?"
-Some coaches like the standard shotgun with a back to one side as many defenses will set their front/run their blitzes based on where the back aligns.  This is simply one more piece of information to help the offensive coordinator "pin down" what the defense is doing and call a play that is more likely to be successful vs. the specific defense that he knows he is going to get.
-One of the few downsides of the pistol is pass protection is more difficult for the deep tailback.  He is forced to take on blitzers deeper in the backfield (closer to the QB), it is more difficult to chip on a good pass rushing DE (this could have helped out our tackles during the spring game), and it is darn near impossible for him to seal the edge on a sprint out pass.  Compare this to the standard shotgun where a running back can stone a blitz at or near the LOS, deliver a chip to a DE on his initial charge, and seal the edge on a sprint out.
-It must be noted that the neither the pistol or basic shotgun is inherently "better" than the other, they are simply different tools. 
- Look for OSU to use the pistol primarily as a downhill running/option/play-action formation.  It will serve the same purpose in this offense as the Pro I served under Tressel, although I must say I believe it will be much more explosive.
  

MediBuck's picture

Thanks so much, Blur! That was really helpful!
I assumed as much about your first point: I saw an interview with Chip Kelly where he talks about why he doesn't use the pistol, and though it was a general commentary during an NFL presser about something else, he talked about how he could force opposing defenses to declare their intentions pre-snap, then run constraints against it.
I didn't realize that about your second point. Thinking about it intuitively now, that makes perfect sense that due to the alignment, it's a tougher assignment for the RB to pick up the rush.
And I, for one, welcome the new incarnation of Dave ;)

"There is a force that makes us all brothers, no one goes his way alone." --Woody Hayes

E2Brutus's picture

Anyone else impressed with Cardale Jones' speed? I didn't think he was that mobile.