Ohio State v. UCF: Offensive Breakdown-Updated

By Ross Fulton on September 11, 2012 at 5:00p
12 Comments

Ohio State's offensive output against Central Florida was perhaps masked by the Buckeye offense's sloppy play, particularly in the second half.  Ohio State was only stopped when they stopped themselves. Yet this sloppiness is itself an issue that must be addressed. Another exemplary rushing performance by Braxton Miller also begs the question of whether he can continue to shoulder this workload for OSU and, relatedly, whether the Buckeyes have other playmakers who can step up.   

UCF: Pretty Standard Really

The Knights kept things fairly basic against Ohio State. But part of the spread option's appeal is that ideally it forces a defense to remain basic to address the changed arithmetic. UCF clearly did not want to get beat deep, and thus featured either cover-2 with two deep safeties or loose cover-1. UCF did sneak their free safety up a la Miami—particularly either when OSU used an H-Back or when when a second back like Corey Brown came into the backfield (see video below). UCF also cheated their defender over the slot into the box. But they were also more likely to play with two deep safeties on passing downs.

Ohio State was happy to take what UCF gave them because it fit well with OSU's strengths. OSU's offensive line was generally able to control the LOS, particularly when UCF did not commit secondary members against the run. This was especially true for LT Jack Mewhort, LG Andrew Norwell, and C Corey Linsley, who are quickly turning into a dominant trio on the line's left side.   

UCF also gave Miller some easy pickings. For instance, on Miller's first touchdown run, the Buckeyes went five wide. UCF responded by walking their back seven out of the box. With an athlete like Miller, this is stealing.

UCF did not make this mistake again, but nonetheless do not expect another defense to give Ohio State this look. Similarly, UCF gave a textbook example of why a defense does not want to play man-coverage against an athletic quarterback. UCF is in cover-1. Note how the play side linebacker turns to cover the slot receiver, leaving a large hole for Miller.   

Miller is obviously the Buckeyes' premier playmaker, so anytime a team wants to make these basic errors against the Buckeyes, OSU will readily take advantage of it. As noted, Ohio State also responded to loose secondary coverage to hit bootleg play action and sprint-out flood routes.

Miller has the most confidence with these routes and threw a nice ball in such situations. Given that UCF was employing cover-2, particularly on passing downs, Ohio State also used a large percentage of smash routes, where Miller would hit the hitch route versus loose coverage.

Notably, OSU did not attack vertically. However, this was likely more a result of UCF not giving up the deep route and allowing OSU to attack underneath. But on the one opportunity that was available, which was Brown on a corner route, Miller underthrew the football, allowing the sinking corner to make an interception. Miller must continue to work on this aspect, as he is currently trying to aim the football rather than throw. While OSU did not push the issue and it did not inhibit their performance versus the Knights' scheme, OSU must still establish that they can push the ball vertically when defenses try to take away the Buckeyes' strengths.  

Against UCF, however, the biggest hindrance to OSU was OSU. And it was not simply turnovers and penalties. Instead, OSU had repeated breakdowns of guys not running the correct play. It was particularly noticeable at running back. Bri'onte Dunn and Rod Smith had their share of lapses, which could perhaps be attributable to limited game reps. However, Carlos Hyde had two blown assignments himself before his injury, demonstrating an endemic issue. An offense cannot successfully function with such repeated breakdowns. 

PlayMakers Wanted?

Perhaps because of these miscues, the offensive coaching staff became increasingly reliant upon Miller. He ended up with 27 carries, a heavy workload for any quarterback. That naturally begs the question whether this is sustainable and, if not, what OSU can do to remedy the issue. For starters, 27 carries may be a misleading number. As noted, OSU had a number of broken plays. On a handful of occasions Miller had no choice but to take off or eat the ball. That puts Miller in the low 20s in carries. That can be broken down further, with another 5-6 representing called pass plays (scrambles, sacks), with the remaining being either called runs or read/option keeps.  

The immutable fact is that the spread-option offense is predicated upon the quarterback running the football. For instance, in his three years starting for Urban Meyer, Tim Tebow averaged almost 17 carries per game. So once you remove the blown plays, Miller did not have that many additional opportunities. Further, Miller is simply OSU's biggest threat, so the coaching staff is going to rely on his legs when they need to make a play.  

Nonetheless, it would be helpful not only to Miller, but also to having a diversified offense, for Miller's carries to be in the 15 range. The question becomes how to get there. Noticeably, the coaching staff has not exhibited a large amount of faith in the Buckeye tailbacks to carry the load. That became increasingly evident after Hyde's injury, but Hyde only had seven carries prior to leaving. Dunn shows a lot of promise running the football, with good vision, a quick burst through the hole, and an ability to finish runs off, but he cannot be utilized until he does not have such mental miscues. Further, as Meyer indicated in his press conference, the coaches are still trying to determine where Jake Stoneburner best fits.  

However, as Meyer also noted, one player that has clearly emerged is Corey Brown. Playing in the infamously named "Percy Harvin" slot role, Brown has shown an ability to get open and make plays after getting the football both in the passing games and on reverses. OSU threw the full panoply of wide receiver screens to Brown—jailbreak, flash (as seen below), and bubble—and as the game progressed, increasingly tried to utilize him.     

Look for Brown to get increased opportunities, including in the option and run game.

The other big development for OSU would be the successful return of Jordan Hall at tailback. Hall was the clear No. 1 halfback this spring, not only on the edge but also running between the tackles. Particularly for Ohio State's inside zone play, the halfback needs to make one cut and go. This suits Hall well, as he is more quick than fast. OSU's offense with Hall in the backfield and Brown in the slot suddenly becomes more dynamic. The bottom line is whether it is because of scheme or lack of trust in their running backs, the Buckeyes have made little use of other base running plays such as counter-trey (other than with Miller running it) beyond inside zone. OSU needs to establish these plays as the season goes along to fully utlize Meyer's offensive system.

Cal: A Quick Primer

As Meyer indicated during his presser, Cal bases from a 'Bear' Defense, a la Double Eagle, which Ohio State has not seen in any extensive manner since playing Pete Carroll's USC defenses. At its base, the Bear defense covers up the center with a NG and both guards with 3-techniques, with the inside linebackers then responsible for the 'C' gaps. 

Generally, this defense will play a one-high safety coverage behind the front. As you may expect, this defense is dedicated first and foremost to stopping the run by eating up the offensive line and preventing combo blocks. It is weakest off-tackle, where the bubbles present themselves. It will be interesting to examine how OSU reacts to this defense in two respects. One, it makes it difficult to run Ohio State's inside zone play. Does OSU respond by altering the halfback's path and/or using more power and counter trey? Two, is OSU able to pull these defenders out of the box via formation and/or taking advantage of numbers in the pass game? It will thus schematically present a good opportunity to see how the Buckeye offense diversifies and builds off what they have done thus far.

Update

Below are highlights of Cal's defense playing Oregon's analogous spread-option offense last fall.  As you can see, Cal continues to play the Bear against Oregon's 3 and 4 WR formations, resulting in single-high coverage.

12 Comments

Comments

Doc's picture

Ross, I have a question kinda unrelated to your article, but one I think needs asked.  Why does Urban and the Buckeyes not practice on Monday and then go really hard Tuesday with a normal day on Wed and then light Thursday and just a walk threw on Friday?  I get the walk threw on Fri, but they are missing two days of practice.  Is it a time restraint thing?  With the lapses on both sides of the ball I would think they would be out there as much as the ncaa would allow. 

"Say my name."

Go Buckeyes14's picture

All NCAA athletes have mondays off. 

Doc's picture

ALL!??!  In every sport?  That is news to me.  I'm sure Urban isn't leaving valuable practice time unused.  It just seems we are getting so much more info on the inter-workings of the football program than in years past.  It seems foriegn to me they practice so "little"(says the guy sitting on his duff watching the games).

"Say my name."

pcon258's picture

i didnt know about the no practice on mondays, but i do know that practice time mid season is fairly limited. As far as i can tell, even high school athletes have more mid season practice time than college. Just leaves that much more up to the players themselves

JKH1232's picture

Well, also, don't forget that the NCAA heavily regulates non-voluntary coach contact with players.  They only get so many hours, and the staff doesn't leave any undone.  (Nor did Tress, or any other coach- not just this staff.)  You can get in trouble by ignoring this, ask Meatchicken.
I don't know if Monday's off is required, but it also makes sense.  The body's anabolic and healing cycles are most pronounced 48 hours or so after strenuous activity.   You want to give the body the best chance to recover in those hours with rest, treatment for minor injuries and good nutrition.  If you practiced again on Monday, players would not have the best chance to recover from the strain of a football game.

SaintTressel's picture

On top of the number of hours per week rule, I'm pretty sure there's a rule stating seven consecutive days of coaching is a no-no. One day off a week is required. I also believe that it's fairly common practice for that day off to be monday, followed by the hardest practice of the week on tuesday.
 
 
 
 

Sterling's picture

No, all NCAA athletes have a cap maximum of mandatory practice time.  I played NCAA tennis (DIII, no scholie for me, but NCAA rules mostly transcend division).  Our typical schedule was Mon-Thurs hard practice, Fri light practice and strategy, Saturday travel and match, Sunday rest.  There is no specified mandatory day off.
 

Ross Fulton's picture

Others could give the details of their weekly schedule better than myself.  But I am positive that they use the maximum number of practice hours available.  Then above and beyond that they watch film, lift, etc.  They obviously allocate the time to allow their bodies to heal and then rest before the game as much as possible, but Urban having Tuesday be his 'hardest' practice is his choice.

bassplayer7770's picture

I am friggin' loving these Offensive breakdowns, Ross.  Thanks again!

razrback16's picture

These are great articles, thank you.

Milk Steak To Go's picture

How many of Braxton's carries were missed reads?  He had a couple option pitches that were there, but instead of pitching he'd try and cut back underneath his man. 

Ross Fulton's picture

I didn't take an exact count, but there were probably 3-5 missed reads.  One series he kept on first down when he should have gave, and then on second down gave where he should have kept.  Also he should have pitched on the option keeps.