Big Ten Coaches, ADs Issue Statement on Proposed NCAA Recruiting Deregulation

By Jason Priestas on February 11, 2013 at 4:24p

Days after Urban Meyer expressed concern over rule proposals, Big Ten football coaches and athletic directors meeting in Chicago today, issued the following statement with regard to pending NCAA legislation impacting college football recruiting:

We reviewed the 26 Rules Working Group proposals acted upon by the NCAA Board of Directors in January, some of which will become effective as early as July 1, 2013.  While we applaud the work that has been done to date, we are very concerned that the timeline proposed for implementation of the proposals does not allow sufficient time for the Football Recruiting Subcommittee of the NCAA Leadership Council to thoughtfully consider the impact of the proposals.

We are specifically concerned with the following three proposals and ask that they be tabled along with Proposal 13-2:

Proposal 11-2: Athletics Personnel – Limitations on the Number and Duties of Coaches – Elimination of Recruiting Coordination Functions
Proposal 13-3: Recruiting – Deregulation of Modes and Numerical Limitations on Communication
Proposal 13-5-A:  Recruiting – Elimination of Printed Recruiting Materials and Video/Audio Legislation
We have serious concerns whether these proposals, as currently written, are in the best interest of high school student-athletes, their families and their coaches.  We are also concerned about the adverse effect they would have on college coaches, administrators and university resources.

We look forward to working with the NCAA toward improving the game, the recruiting process and the overall college football experience for all student-athletes.

This is a valid concern from both sides, with regards to football/family balance. Many coaches have expressed concern recently over the proposed changes, so it's nice to see the league take a unified stance on the issues.



Comments Show All Comments

Buckeyevstheworld's picture

I'm thinking this is what they wanted to avoid.

"YOLO" = I'm about to do something extremely ignorant/stupid & I need an excuse to do it.

Riggins's picture

These new recruiting rules are just a race to the bottom.  The B1G is absolutely right in their concerns.
But the SEC won't care if the B1G imposes a conference override.  They'll go full bore without any regard to the negative effects these rules will have on coaching staffs and high school athletes because PAWWWWL I WANT MORA DEM CHAMPEEYUNSHIPS.
Sensible regulation > No regulation

dbit's picture

I kind of felt like the NCAA making these changes was them saying "Okay, you don't like all of these nit-picky rules/minor violations that we have?  Try this, with no rules!"

Grant Edgell's picture

I fail to understand why anyone on either side would want the (11-2): "...Elimination of Recruiting Coordination Functions" thrown in there.
Is this the Mark Pantoni rule or am I misunderstanding the context of that particular line?