When Zach Boren committed to Ohio State in Spring of 2008, there were as many grumbles as hearty greetings. He wasn’t a blue chip, highly-coveted player and there was a faction of the fanbase who got a little haughty that he was offered a scholarship at all,
chalking up the comittment to his all-Big Ten brother who had just transferred in from Michigan.

So imagine the surprise when the younger Boren not only held his own in practice but won the starting fullback job as a true freshman. He would go on to collect a total of five starts for the year and a touchdown reception against the Hooisers, which is saying something in this day of college football seeing that a handful of teams don’t even list a fullback on the two deep.
Generally speaking, the proliferation of spread offenses has come at the expense of the fullback. No doubt this is much to the dismay of many who aren’t quite fast enough and not quite big enough but it is nonetheless true. Many coaches favor the additional skill player over the glorified guard and, in most respects, it’s hard to blame them. The extra speed stresses defenses by creating more one on one opportunities that span the field horizontally.
But, don’t tell that to Boren.
He, more than anyone, is doing his part to ensure the position isn’t deemed prehistoric. Somewhere in the sweat shrine that is Woody Hayes Athletic Center, he is pushing all 252 lbs of his body to the limit for what may be a breakout year, if a fullback can have one of those. While many are clamoring for tight end Jake Stoneburner to get more touches, my ace in the hole is Boren.
Although we are used to fullbacks making some noise on the ground, Boren is proving to be a viable receiver. Looking at which plays resulted in Boren’s receptions turned out to be an interesting exercise insomuch as the variety in the formations.
ILLNOIS
Set One Back, Pryor Under Center - Bunch Formation
Result Play action boot to Boren. Stoneburner stayed in to block and Boren released to the flat where safety makes tackle 6 yards downfield.
INDIANA
Set One Back, Pryor Under Center - Single WR, Double-TE and Boren offset
Result Play action boot by TP. Stoneburner runs shallow route and Boren follows but more up the hash. Stoneburner draws linebackers leaving Boren free to glide into the endzone.
PENN STATE (two plays)
Set Two back, Pryor in shotgun, 3 WR
Result Play seemed to be designed for either Boren or Herron out of the backfield as both turn quickly looking for the ball. Although held for only 4 yards, there is a lot of space between Boren and the linebackers upon reception.
Set I-Formation, 2 WR
Result Playaction. Pryor hestitates because Penn State linebacker Sean Lee reads run and tries to close the gap on Boren quickly. Zach throws him off
(vid: 3:07 mark) at which time TP delivers the pass for a crucial first down pick up. Saine would score shortly thereafter on another short little pass.

A few things jumped out at me when I was watching these plays. The first is they are all different formations. He catches the ball really well. Additionally, the staff has clearly made a point to make sure Boren is always in motion when he’s receiving a pass. They know he’s effective when running downhill so you never see him release beyond the line of scrimmage, turn and stop for a reception. Lastly, all but one was playaction and the one that was was his shortest gain.
There’s no question the sample size is small but his
spring game performance did nothing to squelch the wonder and offered another sign of maturation. He caught four passes in limited action and pinballed off several would-be tacklers. I genuinely got the sense the defense has a hint of fear when they have to tackle him.
Perhaps most importantly, Boren’s effectiveness should resonate in others areas of Ohio State’s offensive attack. By virtue of being on the field, most defenses will read run initially but defenders will be less enthusiastic to fill when they know Boren is apt to release. This should help Saine and Herron. His lead blocking is also kryptonite for smaller linebackers; oddly enough, the kind used in many defenses to combat the advent of the spread. It eventually wears on a defense.
It’s not that Ohio State will suddenly reformat its proverbial hardrive and go fullback overload, but Boren’s ability does give one the feeling he could be a factor this year, unlike what we’ve seen in past. His effectiveness is spread in different ways and his impact was often larger than the post game statistics.
Comments
I definitely think we have the tools in place to successfully move the football. I like Boren a lot...Stoneburner I think will be great depending if we spread the ball around. With the loss of Duron Carter that should open up some looks for Stoney....We have great depth at many positions this year....I just hope to see the 2006 playbook and not the run up the middle three times with no holes and punt offense. As far as Seantrel Henderson.....it would be a great depth addition but thats about it.....he's a monster no doubt but I could go w/o all the dramatics.I doubt he leaves but I wouldnt hate it if he came to C-bus.
Hey Keith, nice piece of writing with great work on the film breakdown. Thanks a bunch.
Brilliant.
I'd much rather see this thoughtful analysis & understanding of players already in the program and working hard than incessant rumor mongering over what some dizzy 17 year old athlete is tweeting to his mob.
Thanks. Solid.
Another great post by Keith.
I kinda wanna take this article as the "cherry on the top" for opposing defenses we face this year. (Opposing team watching film) "Okay, so it looks like we got a multi-formation spread offense we're facing here, hmmm, look, they used their FB to catch a pass for a first down. Then a couple plays later, they throw a bomb to Posey. Later in the game, this monster of a tight end Jake Stoneburna gets involved and looks to get physical for a mid field catch and a date with a linebacker. Oh s&%#, now we also have to worry about that stud QB Terrelle Pryor. 2nd and 3 at the 13 in enemy territory and B. Saine runs wheel route and its a TD."
Assistant to Randy Shannon, "Coach, I think we already lost the game."
I don't feel as though Seantrel comes with alot of dramatics. IMO, he was mislead by LK, and now he is looking to make the best decision for himself again. Hopefully, JT would welcome him with open arms. The "U" offers great early PT, but I don't remember too many great o-line players coming out of there.
I could see JB running the ball afew times also, he's a load.
I'm as excited about his development as a blocker. A big part of the difference between our run offense versus USC and versus Iowa or Penn State was Boren's improvement. I love the film of him just blowing up Lee in the Penn State game.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
Zach Boren at 1:08 is why I'm excited.
The "Vested One" has a lot of offensive talent this year. Let's hope the playbook is put to full use.
Keith,
Great read. I think we have enough skill players and Tress will mix up the plays a lot. Should drive D's CRAZY!!
If Terelle is ready then I think that will happen. Can't wait to see what this team can do.
I noticed that block, too. Lee did everthing he could to make sure he wasn't on his back. Beautiful ISO.
great post as always!
Great post, as always.
Love the post, keith.
Great post Keith. I think Boren was an absolute monster at points during last season. It is a good feeling knowing that we have a bruising blocker leading the way for our stable of running backs. Really enjoyed the set up of each play and the subsequent result format. Keep it up.
ditto. I like the film breakdown sort of posts. The chess match is compelling; recruiting is too often like watching TMZ with the wife.