The Big Ten's Post Season Tourney: It's that simpleEssentially the quest for the one seed at this point has become a three horse race. Purdue (12-3), Ohio State (12-4), and Michigan State (11-4) remain the lone competitors for the honors of the '09/'10 conference regular season title and the top billing in Indianapolis. Let's take a look at what they have left: Purdue: Michigan State (Sun. 2/28), Indiana (Wed. 3/03), @ Penn State (Sat. 3/06) Ohio State: Michigan (Sat. 2/27), Illinois (Tue. 3/02) Michigan State: @ Purdue (Sun. 2/28), Penn State (Thur. 3/04), Michigan (Sun. 3/07)
So what has to transpire to have this shake out for each of the clubs? (the league's tie-break procedures can be combed over here)
Purdue claims the 1 seed if: They win out OR they beat Michigan State, only lose one of their two remaining, AND Ohio State loses at least one of two.
Sitting at 12-4, Purdue has a game to spare on the two next closest challengers. Losing any of their final three contests, however, opens up the door for a potential 3-way tie between Ohio State and Michigan State or a scenario where records against Sparty (or a combination of Sparty, Wisconsin, and Illinois) enters in and tend to favor on the side of Ohio State. Assuming they win out in spite of the monumental loss of Robbie Hummel for the season (who dropped 32 on the Bucks earlier in the year where as his likely replacement Patrick Bade has 42 on the year), Purdue controls their own destiny at this point in the process.
Ohio State claims the 1 seed if: They win out AND Purdue loses a game.
The Bucks' math is surprisingly more simple than it may seem at face value. Because of the large likelihood of a 3-way tie or a scenario where the next team they're compared head-to-head against is Sparty (or a combination of Sparty/Wisconsin/Illinois assuming Ohio State handles their business next Tuesday evening), whom the Buckeyes have a covetous 1-0 (or net +1 win advantage in a 3-team cumulative win comparison scenario) record to their names, the Bucks find themselves in prime position for a conference title so long as Purdue drops one of their remaining three. If Ohio State is upset a second time by Michigan or slips up in their home finale against Illinois (The Villain's probably final home game in the Scarlet & Grey), they'd essentially need two losses from the Boilermakers to come out on top. Confused yet? So basically invest all your emotions into rooting for the Bucks (a real stretch, I know) and against Purdue and the team should be set.
Michigan State claims the 1 seed if: They win out AND Purdue collapses AND Ohio State drops at least one of two.
Tom Izzo's crew's bleak championship hopes (largely due to that 0-1 differential vs the Bucks) means they have to handle their business and hope for a little help. If the Boilermakers drop a pair and Ohio State can't close the deal against the Illini, Sparty's window of opportunity will be wide open. Consequently, the Spartans' margin of error is non-existent. A single loss to any of their final three opponents, and their 1-seed/regular season title aspirations are done-zo.
As for the rest of the seeds? There are essentially 4 distinct "pods" of teams which should play their way out to make up the Big Ten tournament's field. The aforementioned #1 seed contenders, the contenders for the final first round byes (Wisconsin/Illinois), those in the mix for the #6 seed (Minnesota/Northwestern/Michigan) and the rest of what's around (Iowa/Indiana/Penn State). Assuming the "favorites" in each remaining game play out victoriously (admittedly a rather presumptuous jump to conclusions), essentially the sort of final standings/seedings we'd be looking at should resemble something like this:
| Projected Final 2009-10 Big Ten Standings | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| TEAM | CONF | GB | OVR |
| 1. Ohio State | 14-4 | - | 24-7 |
| 2. Purdue | 14-4 | - | 26-4 |
| 3. Michigan State | 14-4 | - | 24-7 |
| 4. Wisconsin | 13-5 | 1 | 23-7 |
| 5. Illinois | 11-7 | 3 | 19-12 |
| 6. Minnesota | 9-9 | 5 | 18-12 |
| 7. Northwestern | 9-9 | 5 | 21-10 |
| 8. Michigan | 6-12 | 8 | 13-17 |
| 9. Indiana | 4-14 | 10 | 10-20 |
| 10. Iowa | 3-15 | 11 | 9-22 |
| 11. Penn State | 2-16 | 12 | 10-20 |
Minnesota would win the 6-seed tie-breaker by virtue of their win over Wisconsin. And really, who can't wait for the 9th seed de-facto "championship game" that will be Sunday's Indiana-Iowa game?
Ohio State would draw the winner of the 8/9 game between Michigan and Indiana, Wisconsin and Illinois would meet with the winner drawing the Ohio State/ UM/IU winner, Purdue would see the winners of Northwestern and Iowa, and Michigan State would take on the prevailing side between Minnesota and Penn State.
We wrap up this week by tipping our hat to the Lady Buckeyes, who've long since already wrapped up their own respective one seed and an absurd sixth consecutive regular season title. To our commenter requesting more coverage of the non-money sports, your day has finally come. It may never happen again, so cherish this moment proudly. The ladies (and you alike) have earned it. For the rest of you, we pay homage by showing you the one dynamic element of the women's game you've been missing out on, and in turn leave your heads dreaming of a potential Villain/Prahalis master race, reared and ready just in time for a potential 2031/'32 national title run:






Comments
Looks like another Big 10 title for the Buckeyes with Hummel out for the year. MSU should win at PSU and we should take care of business. We owe Michigan a can of destruction and Illinois is always a big game for Turner
*Purdue haha
I think your theory has a slight flaw.
Yes, purdue has to lose a game for the Buckeyes to grab the #1 seed, but it MUST be Michigan State. If Purdue beats Sparty and loses elsewhere, its a two-team tie. Having split the head-to-head, they'd go to the next tiebreaker, which is best record against the next-best team down the standings....and Purdue would win based on a 2-0 record against third-place MSU vs Ohio State's 1-0 record.
Purdue lost Hummel, not Kramer.
ohio state womens basketball - dont be that guy who misses the next slightly above average bounce pass!
thats being said, go lady bucks. samantha prahalis would destroy me. and i would let her. all night long.
Yep. Penalized because of Big 10 scheduling. Not that it matters much for this tourney, but damn, add 3-5 teams already.
Winning the regular season title would be nice, but I just want to avoid that 4/5 game in the B10 tourney. That one always seems to be a dogfight. And preferably, I'd like to avoid the 3-seed 'cause I'd much rather play the winner of Iowa and Northwestern than a Minnesota team that can beat or lose to anyone on any given night.
Yeah, Wisconsin/Illinois would be a tough out, no doubt. If this team wants a 2-seed in the bigger dance though, it may as well get all the extra quality W's it can get.
DERP. Fixed, thanks. That's what I meant, and after all, scrappy white guys are scrappy white guys, you know? This is worse (though certainly not closer to our hearts) than my constant Joe Bauserman/Todd Boeckman typos in the fall.
Wisco has Leuer back, too.
Bill Simmons giving more love to Titus and apparently others are trying as well but the NCAA is cockblocking. BOOOO to you NCAA, boo.
"That reminds me, my friend Kimmel wanted to have Titus (www.clubtrillion.com) on his show and NCAA rules prevented it. Does anything suck more than the NCAA? Coaches can recruit players, then ditch a school for another team and leave those recruits happening and it's fine... a funny benchwarmer on a Big 10 team wants to go on a talk show and he can't. Thanks for redefining the word "suck" NCAA."
Turner staying? Should we hope for the Bucks not to win the Big Ten; not to go deep in the NCAA? I'm not, I think he's gone anyway; but Mom could be the impetus for him staying (getting degree).
http://blog.dispatch.com/hoops...
as nice as it would be to have him back, he would be an absolute moron to stay. He can always come back for his degree, or even do it as distance learning to finish it up. Might as well get the money while he still can. Just too much risk in coming back, for not enough payoff, when he's already a lottery pick
Come to think about it, there wouldn't be enough basketballs or time to go around next year to keep everyone happy if ET would stay; Matta's got some tough descisions to make anyway.
My favorite part
"Asked if he’d spoken to former OSU teammates who’d left early for the pros, Turner replied, “I talked to B.J. (Mullens) last week and he said it’s real tough. You’re really going to have to have time management and use your time and be mature for that situation, because you’re playing with men right now.”
Off topic, but holy shit, Our hockey team is DESTROYING the Finns. Never seen it rain goals like this. 6-0 in the 1st, Hell Yeah!
U-S-A U-S-A U-S-A!
Off topic again, but there hasn't been a new football post today: is this the weakest draft from the Big Ten in years? I only saw two players from the conference listed in the top 50 of the various mock drafts.
No kidding! I stepped into the other room to get a cup of coffee and missed two goals. Evidently, so did the Finnish goaltender..