Can you imagine being Clemson right now, waking up and realizing you’re going to have to play a team with a pulse?
The OSU receiving corps all displayed ridiculous hands yesterday. Mack had a ridiculous grab and Wilson had a couple that were wild. Great hands everywhere.
It was quite a day for Buckeye second half surges.
That was a Jack Tatum special
Well, that left a lot to be desired.
I guess the scrimmage win over Louisville was no fluke. These guys are legit.
Day to Holtmann: hold my beer
IIRC, the basket Bucks do well when playing the same day as the B1G football championship. Give me the good guys in another solid showing.
If he plays...
Hopefully, Baker and McMillan get cut too so they can get away from the dumpster fire in Miami.
I'm not entirely sure what Pantoni's role would be in the NFL. Not that he's not capable, but that seems more like a front office job in the NFL than something on the staff.
I think they should hire Elliott AND Lincoln Riley - why not have both!
I think that's what they are afraid of. Imagine losing to Alabama under those circumstances.
Good luck, Wisconsin, you're going to need it.
Day shows his Belichikian side this weekend and smothers Bucky Badger on national TV.
I don't think it's sexist at all. It's merely an identifier so that people know what you're referencing. We also use helpful identifiers like "Basketball" Bucks, so we know what sport is being referenced. Even on ESPN they reference their sections as NCAAM and NCAAW so that there is a deliniation. And, by the way, I'm fine calling it the men's basketball team.
The one that bugs me is when the athletes are referred to as a "former" Buckeye. You are never a former Buckeye, just an alumni.
Usually works for Kentucky and Duke in MBB and UCONN in WBB...
I would think that relative to their elders Boomers also had substantially more education at that point.
You're either insane or kidding yourself if you voted for Taylor over Young. Clearly B1G West coaches. I mean really, this is the easiest vote in the history of this award.
You also trade off a lot of the game experience when you're in the stadium. The broadcast gives you a ton of information about injuries, statistical accomplishments and, most significantly, replays. The stadium crew does a horrendous job giving any kind of meaningful replay on a consistent basis.
I think people's interest for analytics during the game will continue to drive people away. Until there's power for your phone and exemplary wifi, they will continue to struggle with attendance. And that's IF they address all the other issues you guys have mentioned.
Interesting info, but I'd also put this in the "DUH" category. Of course my parents are going to have more discretionary income than my kids. When you've had 40 years to put money away and progress through your career, you should be substantially better off than someone early in their career.
This might as well be a graph of 10K invested in 1970, 10K invested in 1990 and 10K invested in 2010 and how much it's worth now.
You're not wrong that this might impact attendance, but I think it's a little silly for the article to suggest that this discrepancy is wrong or surprising.
Didn’t they bring in 5 5* girls this year? How have they already lost 3 games?
Here's what worries me... They will change things up knowing what they need to do to exploit us having seen where UM and PSU had success. We won't change anything because we don't think we need to and don't want to give anything away heading into playoff matchups. I think that makes for a much closer game than last time. I would love to be wrong.
Here's your transitive property game preview:
OSU > Louisville
Lousiville > Michigan
Michigan > UNC
Thus, OSU > UNC
I feel like Clemson won the National Championship last year...