I don't think it will anything like '07. Didn't they say no tackling?
Some players are practice players and
some are game players.
Apparently, Ahrens is the latter.
No one should be on the committee. Just use BCS rankings and save a lot of money and it's more objective. There, fixed it for everyone concerned.
Recusing while OSU is discussed is practically the same as a NO vote in my book. It might even be worse because he can't even give any arguments for OSU. Me thinks that Gene is much smarter than what people give him credit and he experienced first hand the incompetence of the committee and wanted out fast.
I want to know how Vegas gave 400:1 odds for the Rams scoring 3 points. I would think 2 points might be at these odds but 3? Very strange.
They should just remove all doubt about the game being tackle football and make it 2 hand tag.
If you think you're going to run a 4.35, tell the world you're going to run a 4.6, then when you run a 4.45 it's excellent, not disappointing.
^^^This all day^^^
The most certain clue to how it will go? His attorney has never lost a case on this matter before. So you can bet your house that he will get the waiver.
Which offensive coach is this???
Yes, he was.
I read that to mean that the student athlete has to complete at least one year at current school. Tate has completed 1.5 years already and so would be eligible to leave whenever.
I think it’s correct leaving Texas lower than Georgia. Using your logic, Purdue should be ranked over OSU. The other games count too.
Actually, they were the first to win, period.
GO BUCKS!!! Beat Washington!!!!
They should still use that bulliten board material. It’s what Washington people believe. Good motivator for defense.
I agree, the committee is a joke. I think they should use the BCS computer rankings. This will save a lot of money and human resources and be much more objective.
I wonder though if ND was not in the mix, would the committee have chosen Georgia over OSU? The final ranking before bowls suggest this. That would have been an outright travesty.
-Buckslan.....I can not believe the DV's you are getting for your logical statement. Shows how many people in this world have no logic or reason behind their thinking.
You're right, my bad. I was thinking of Bryant's backup last year.
Your damn right it's sour grapes and justified. OSU is the only team to not get any "benefit of the doubt" arguments when they should. I have to admit they got one 2 years ago when they shouldn't have when they didn't win the conference. I think it should be a requirement but not an automatic bid to win conference to get in the playoff.
You have zero logic or you don't know that oranges are different than oranges. Sorry to go above your head.
Can you explain how that happened??!!!
How in the %&///&&/(&%$$$%%&/!!!!!!! did Purdue beat OSU!!!!!!! THEY SUCK ((/&%$£&/&%$%&&//!!!!!!!
a substantial mistake career wise? Only if career equals money earned then I guess you could phrase it that way but first off, career is way more than money earned and two, if he were to have a year as successful as this year, he would be number one overall pick with Heismann. You could make an argument that his overall career would be enhanced for staying another year with another year under his belt.
I think he wants to play another year at OSU. We know his dream was to be the QB here and having only one year might seem a bit short. If he loves playing at the college level which is probably much better than playing at the NFL level(for many this is true) where it becomes a job, then he just might stay.
Lawrence ended up losing that game to Syracuse. What did Haskins do when he came into the game against *ichigan when Barrett got injured? Oh yeah, he won the game. Funny how Clemson got a pass too when they lost an eventual 2nd team Qb to injury and Ohio State got nothing for losing the best player in college football 3 days before Purdue game. What is that called?
No one complains about the bb buckeyes not being champions because it was decided on the court and not in some small room by 13 people who have biases and very subjective criteria. The committee has to go. Ditch the committee and use the BCS computer rankings. I had read that the BCS standings had OSU at #3 this year. This method would save the NCAA a lot of money for not having to pay the committee members.