I'm sure they both have their upsides. But are either of them an improvement across the board over Patterson?
That's the million dollar question. I think Patterson has good physical tools. He's a better thrower than McCaffrey, but not as good of a runner. Milton as a stronger arm than Patterson, but as of yet is not as accurate. But, I think Patterson's worst quality was reading coverage, making good decisions, finding the open WR, and handling pressure. I have a hard time believing McCaffrey & Milton will be as bad in that regard, but we don't really know yet.
That remains to be seen. If Michigan wants to compete next year, they'll need a substantially improved offense.
Agreed, at least against OSU.