beamga's picture


Member since 21 November 2013 | Blog


  • NFL TEAM: Green Bay Packers
  • NHL TEAM: Columbus Blue Jackets
  • MLB TEAM: Cincinnati Reds

Recent Activity

Comment 11 Feb 2016

True, because basketball is not a contact sport in the same way that football is.  My point is that everything moves so fast and the game is so inherently physical that I believe there needs to be some leeway.  Also, I believe the intent of the player that committed the targeting foul needs to at least be a consideration.  Two targeting fouls from the same player in a game should result in an ejection.  One targeting foul that is deemed egregious and/or intentional should also result in an ejection.  To kick a player out after one unintentional, non-egregious targeting call seems excessive to me.

Comment 11 Feb 2016

I'm all for player safety and I think the current targeting rules help to protect players, however ejecting a player after one targeting foul is too harsh in my opinion.  Similar to technical fouls in basketball, I believe if a player commits two targeting fouls he should be ejected.  If the player is unable/unwilling to adjust after the first targeting foul then he should face the consequence of an ejection.

Comment 03 Jan 2016

I think the hit in the ASU game was clearly worthy of an ejection and, if I'm being completely objective, Bosa's ejection was probably justified based on how the rule's written but it certainly could have gone either way.  The ASU hit should result in an ejection every time.

Comment 07 Dec 2014

Can we get Burrow college-ready by Jan. 1st?