allinosu's picture


from Reynoldsburg,ohio

MEMBER SINCE   October 06, 2013

My wife and I are retired and run a small morning café but our passion is taking care of rescue animals. The count currently 15 dogs and 7 cats. My icon is "my old dog George" who was our first recue that died in November 13th 2014 leading me to my first forum topic here.


  • SPORTS MOMENT: Winning the national championship 1968, 2002 and 2014.
  • NFL TEAM: Used to be the Browns. Teams with OSU players.
  • NHL TEAM: none
  • NBA TEAM: Cavs
  • MLB TEAM: Reds
  • SOCCER TEAM: Womens olympic team

Recent Activity

Comment 12 hours ago

In the last few months there has been several fair proposals on here that have a lot of promise. The problem is the bidder paid for chaos and is very happy with the status quo. It's about money and the money was with chaos and those who ae upset still tune in. In addition, both sides were determine to get as far from the NFL model as they could.

Comment 14 hours ago

Money bought out the no automatic bids scenario. I still like only counting the best 12 games idea. This gives those that play a 13th championship game a bonus to eliminate a mistake without teams that win it with multiple losses getting in. This year it would've put Oklahoma and OSU in and ND out which would force them in a conference.

Comment 09 Dec 2018

I think it's a combination of things that's caused defensive problems. Losing our DB coach, LB coach not worth a shit, Day replacing Urban after the Tennessee crap. I think it took it's toll. If he even if he does stay I think things will get better. 

Comment 07 Dec 2018   

It's about money, not fairness. Even with 8 team there would be no automatic bids because of money.

Comment 07 Dec 2018

If by some SMALL chance the conferences combine, they should have and promote the last game as Rivalry week big time. Maryland-Rutgers, W. Virginia-PSU, Iowa-ISU, KU-KU St- Texas-Baylor, TTU-TCU, OSU-UM, NW-MSU, Indiana-Purdue, Wisconsin-Minnesota, IU-Nebraska, OK-OK ST.

Comment 07 Dec 2018

I'd be more on board with it if they call it what it is and not what it is supposed to be. Best QB on a popular big school that doesn't lose regardless of character.

Comment 07 Dec 2018

BOOM! Just what we needed. It negates the look that recruits and commits are trending away. I thought all along once the train started moving it would steam ahead. This could be that time. Much needed.

Comment 05 Dec 2018

Not a fact that it's more money. You have to get someone to bid money for it and that didn't happen the last time around. ESPN paid high for chaos and the conferences refused to give up conference championship games (which generates boo-coo money for them they don't have to share). They received bids for more than four and the "biggest bang for the buck was the system they have now" You can either have fair or money but not both at this point. It's fun to speculate but as those in charge have stated, it is contracted tighty until mid 2020s and would be unreasonable for the buyout. Plus they are extremely happy that threads like this are popping up all over the country because those that want change still tune in.

Comment 04 Dec 2018

I don't think the fullback is the way to go. We use TEs roaming across the back of the line to get the same result. More flexibility. I also think QB runs should be determine by the QBs assets. If the QB is a better runner, than more runs, if not, less. Just an opinion but I think the main problem with the O-line is one of entitlement. Stupid penalties by them was one of the biggest problems so if they don't get it together, have the balls to sit them. How many times in the games when we were struggling did we see jumping the count, slow or bad centering the ball, hands to the face or holding most every time we were in scoring position?