I believe this is a huge step in the right direction.
Feed the trolls
Agreed. But how will value be determined?
NCAA Football 20...It's in the game.
"There's still some green showing before you see the chalk."
Exactly where my mind went!
If you’re a collegian star making money you would be likely to play 4 years so as to not jeopardize your income. Plus an endorser would probably insist that you play your bowl games. This will make college football and especially basketball better imo.
If you're a star you're still going to bolt after 3 years. These types of changes are still going to be nowhere near an NFL paycheck.
But this would still be good for the average Joe CFB player.
Not always gonna bolt. We’re talking about profiting from likeness and fame. There are so many examples of tweener athletes who leave early only to find they aren't physically right for success at the next level. Cardale would never have the fame at the next level. He could’ve been a rich famous kid at osu.
For a year he would been. And it would have been nowhere near what he made carrying a clipboard in the NFL. On the other hand, there are guys unlikely to leave early because of their long odds at making an NFL roster who would benefit at lot; the name JT Barrett comes to mind.
Would give them another incentive to stay in school. If stars are compensated as jerseys are sold..etc...they will get a piece not just the university...seems good to me.
Think about all the college guys we cherish that are out of the league too quickly. This could be a nice little something for them. All the guys from 2014 class would play on forever
I think it depends on the player. For players who were on the fence one way or another, yes, getting paid some money now is definitely a nice incentive to tip the direction towards staying - a 4th/5th round football player or second round basketballer could improve their draft stock by returning, so why not stick around and get more experience while also getting some money. But for the lock first rounders and true stars (i.e., the same dudes who're probably getting many of the endorsements in the first place), there's no amount of money that'd reasonably be offered that would make them turn down serious NFL/NBA money.
The money from endorsements (while nice) isn't going to remotely match what a first round pick is going to do for you. Denzel Ward sat out the Cotton Bowl and got a $19.7 million signing bonus. There's no way an endorser is giving a cornerback anywhere even close to that level of money. Ditto for the NBA, there's no level of collegiate endorsements that's going to make a Zion or Barrett or DeAndre Ayton pass up a guaranteed contract worth $20 mil or more.
As for endorsers insisting on bowl games, companies don't seem to mind when players sit out Week 17 of the NFL season. Especially for national corporations that would want to keep the player into the NFL/NBA and develop that relationship, they'd probably actually prefer the player leave early and become an even bigger star at the next level.
Not talking about 1st rounders like Ward. Talking about Devin Smith guys who kill in college but disappear in the nfl.
Letting players profit from their own image is a step in the right direction, but as with anything there would be lots of unintended consequences. I can't imagine too many O-linemen will be happy that the star QB is suddenly making money from jersey sales while they're getting nothing.
I can't imagine too many O-linemen will be happy that the star QB is suddenly making money from jersey sales while they're getting nothing.
They can always switch positions...
Fair point and I agree, but much like the NFL, good QBs take care of their line. Maybe a weekly trip to lunch could help. It’s not a nice NFL type gift, but I think you know what I mean.
Also, I don’t see players profiting off jersey sales. In my head, it’s a star player endorsing his favorite spot to eat or making a weekend appearance in the off season.
"as with anything there would be lots of unintended consequences."
Very true, and reading between the lines of the article it seems like there's enough of a threat from proposed legislative changes that the NCAA is being forced to attempt to head off any laws by making changes to their current rules. I worry about the unintended consequences from any changes - legislative or NCAA. As many of the posts here indicate, there's a lot to be considered and the issue is quite complex.
O linemen and non-star types still get a free college education. Not shabby. But this could reverse the trend of skill guys not playing bowl games and guys coming out after sophomore year who need one more year.
James Tressel would be a very prudent addition to this working group, as well.
James Tressel would be a very prudent addition to this working group, as well.
If he has the time, Tressel might contribute valuable insights, particularly about players selling their own gear for whatever reasons (helping their families or whatever). But Tressel was in their doghouse, and they may not want to let him out just yet. So the NCAA may not want his participation to be public. They would be wise to seek his input privately though.
Our honor defend, so we'll fight to the end !
They can't pay the players directly without Title IX implications, and that's something the NCAA can't control. This is probably a necessary step. The committee's job will be to figure out how to minimize (because it's impossible to eliminate) booster/businessmen from overpaying the actual value to the business for images/endorsements in order to recruit players to their favorite teams, and possible to balance out the "unfairness" of disparity between, say, linemen and QBs.
I've never understood how giving money only to profit generating sport athletes would be a violation of Title IX. Title IX states
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
Why would an athlete of a sport that doesn't generate a profit be entitled to the same thing as one that generates millions? Why is paying someone their worth considered discrimination? I don't see the fundamental logic here.
Strength equipment is expensive & guarantees you nothing. A strong will is free & will give you everything you need.
Your logic is sound, but Title IX is corrupt in practice.
I think there have been several updates to the original Title IX that have stretched and bastardized it original meaning. For example, from your quote above, there is no mention that you must have equal male/female scholarship athletes. However, that is the 'rule' that most of us think of when someone mentions Title IX.
You could have an equal number of teams, but that doesn't mean they have to pay all the teams just because they pay some. They just have to have the same opportunity. So, if they start generating profit they could get paid too. I don't see anything in the language that would require they all receive equal compensation...only equal opportunity. From my perspective paying only the profit generating sports doesn't seem to violate Title IX.
Oregon will go on a NC run not too long after this gets approved.
Sounds like an opportunity for some young'n to start a new business. You know to be ready when the new rules are announced. Just a suggestion, but "Bagmen R Us" has a ring to it!
Beat everyone, in every sport, all the time!!!
They should name Chris Spielman to the group
It's a bit of a tricky situation because certain positions gain much more attention than others. For example in 2015 you could expect a lot of #15, #16 and #12 jerseys to be sold, maybe #97 too, but as to the rest of the team, not so much. I'm just pointing out that even at a powerhouse team like OSU "paying for use of personal likeness" would be inequitable.
I think the NCAA should just place an even tax on all companies profiting from CFB merchandise, then distribute that money evenly to member schools. It would be sad if it just devolves into a popularity contest.
But at the end of the day, just fix all of this sh*t so I can play NCAA 2020.
"We get paid to score touchdowns, not kick field goals"
-- Urban Meyer
While the formation of this group is an important step to confirming what we believe as an association, the group’s work will not result in paying students as employees.
If this is the case, I'll be curious to see how athletes would be compensated.
I have always believed that this was the best solution. I'm not really a supporter of paying players, but they 100% should be able to profit from their own likeness/image/brand. If they want to sign autographs once a week and charge money, great. If they get a sponsor who posts on their social media accounts, awesome. Big time players will earn what they are worth in the social space and it will scale somewhat appropriately on its own. Everyone is happy!
Pick up your feet, turn your corners square! And DRIVE DRIVE DRIVE!!!
Being in the media biz, I’ve worked with guys like Jack Hannah who can milk a 30 year career out of 15 minutes on Johnny Carson. Troy Smith, on the other hand was a dazzling college player/Heisman winner who was prohibited from making money while truly famous. He just disappeared in the pro game. The lost potential income for his national tv exposure is in the millions.
That brings me down.
"Sorry coach, I have to do a commercial spot and I can't make practice this week. Why don't you use the second team instead. Got to go, see you next week." It's coming fans!
"I think Alabama would beat Ohio State if they played next weekend!" Clay Travis Fox Sports Post Championship Show 1.12.2015. Needs no explanation.
No it isn't.
I bleed scarlet...literally
Doing that would hurt their endorsement potential not help it. Getting paid for your likeness or your endorsement is a double edged sword. Not only will they have to live up to team standards the white hot social spotlight will be on them and demand conformance or the money goes away.
While this is a step in the right direction it is unlikely to have any significant effect on players deciding when to enter the draft. There is more then enough money being paid by agents under the table already, even if fans choose to pretend otherwise, and players still leave early. The NCAA is likely to be very measured in what it allows, if it makes changes at all. There are certainly players whose image is more valuable while they are in college, but no one knows that until after the fact and guys that age are more likely to believe they will excel in the NFL than to assume they have hit their ceiling in college.