I think they may take 3, but Hawkins and Hill will probably play WR too. Not sure how that factors in.
I can comment on the QB battle as well, does that qualify me to explain how OSU will get down to 85 players by fall?
They have better sources than I do, I admit that.
So since they have sources and can ask them questions. Which question do you think the source is more likely to answer:
1. "how is the QB battle going?"
2. "who do think won't be on the roster in the fall?"
I would guess the 2nd question would be one that might not get you invited back.
I am serious. And stop calling me Shirley.
I want Austin Mack and Amir Mitchell.
I am calm. If there were repercussions, OSU would not be able to have 88 players right now.
The rule is 85 by the fall.
ND had something like 93 on NSD...
I don't know you and would never assume you are an awful person. You are asking a question to someone that can't answer it because they simply don't know.
Agree. Scott kept bama close in that game.
Reminded me of when osu played oregon in 09'. I wanted to punch my TV every time Barner had a 30+ yard punt return EVERY time he touched it. Kept Oregon in the game.
I am perfectly calm. What do you want them to discuss exactly? How are they responsible for discussing the OSU football team getting their roster from 88 to 85? How are they even qualified?
You are coming "under fire" because you are asking a question that someone who is NOT on the OSU staff cannot answer.
"Are there repercussions?" What does that mean? Repercussions for what?
It sounded to me like he was simply stating an opinion.
What the hell do you want him to say?
There are 88 players on the roster. There have to be 85 by fall. Do you really want him to guess who they will be? Seriously? How would he know?
Seriously. What do you want him to say? You are fishing for something, that much is clear. Do you want him to say "these 3 players will be gone" or "OSU will process 3 players"?
The CB feature is cool, as long as folks pay attention to who makes them...
OSU already has 2 extremely highly ranked DE's committed for this class....
All I want for christmas is a josh king commit....
I am sure that one reason is because there isn't room for Johnson in this class.
Gotta love breaking the Mccall story!
Yes. Biggest ND homer EVER.
How in the world is that relevant?
there is a movie about Marshall too.....
I wonder if that qualifies as "enthusiasm unknown to mankind"?
probably not. He should have just tweeted it. IMO it would have meant more.
UV for you just because of your screen name.
I know. I was being silly.
Just watched the sugar bowl again....
you shut your damn mouth about Darron lee!!!
Doubt they would offer a guy on a visit and not accept his commitment.
The simplified playbook is 100% correct.
The "read options" cardale was running were not "options" 90% of the time.
Passes were much simpler reads as well.
I love Jones and of course he has a better arm, but JT allows for many more options.
Hell to the yeah.....
FWIW, Texas has a DT QB commit for the 2016 class already.