It's hard to keep up with all of the sports figures aliases for Tinder cheating and STD testing.
and when healthy, has never missed a start in the NFL
That's kind of how that works for starters. But I know what he meant.
Should have included a ****TRIGGER WARNING****
I read it the first time as who would win between Urban and Tressel and sadly I thought "we've seen that and it did not go well"
He (along with Youbouty) both went to Klein High School, which is my alma maters rival. So while I hated when he did it, I also laughed as well.
25 with 5:24 left and the website froze on me for the second time. I was definitely slowing down though. Figure I would have finished between 30-35 unless my guesses got really good.
Sorry, but no way.
These have to be the only 2 answers I think.
The Pitt game is funnier in hindsight due to May and it was a whooping, but 59-0 is my winner. Opponent, stage, and considerations for new QB all in play.
OK. For players I have seen (TV or otherwise)
Ryan (worst PITCHER of this group but potential of most dominant)
I think Kershaw is close to joining this list.
Everyone above except Kershaw (for now)
Plus Koufax, Gibson, Walter Johnson.
PITCHERS WHO BELONG BASED ON ABILITY OR A SHORT TERM but not for a career (injury, etc...)
Wood - his 20K game was probably the best one ever pitched
Arrietta - amazing but for less than a season so far
Gooden - his 84 season was one of the best ever and at such a young age
I miss Animaniacs.
I also think it is crazy how most people think that the genius one is The Brain and the insane one is Pinky.
Now is when we need our own John U. Bacon. He'd get the story and tell it really well. Might be better after Beck leaves though.
Hilliard is a redshirt freshman. Too early to say injury issues with him.
Brutal take but not altogether untrue. You will incur the wrath of many on here. I'm not one but still.
But then again, Cardale Jones, Curtis Grant, Dunn.........
You may be right with the transfer numbers. the WR group for example is huge.
If you don't want to speculate that is fine. I don't have a problem with it as long as it isn't (this guy needs to go cause he sucks).
Though I stuck to actually naming only 5th years and early entrants.
If you are referring to his "all should be considering other options now" line I kind of agree.
The fact that he is speculating on names in general. Not as much. I think it is fair to take educated guesses though I disagree with quite a few names in his assessment this early.
WR seems very talented but very inexperienced. names like Dixon, Clark, and Stump may be premature as it seems like a whoever steps up plays kind of thing.
Alabi has only his classmates and 3 5th year (will be) Sr's in front of him one of whom's career is already done. Seems premature as well.
I think you are looking at 5th years and then whomever can't get out of the bottom of the depth chart are likely transfer candidates. Seems a bit early to say that about some of the guys you name though you may ulitmately be right.
I count 9 5th year seniors for 2017 according to Eric's chart. One of those is Munger so he is already out.
That leaves 8, that could be told you got your 4 years but you won't be on scholarship anymore. One of those is Barrett and if he wants to come back he'll get to. Now you are at 7 spots that could open..
One is Conley, he's probably NFL bound.
One is Billy Price, he plays if he stays.
You are left with Lisle, Sprinkle, Lewis, Hill, and Worley. If they get "let go" you have 5 spots plus Conley and maybe Price. If they both go you have 7 from the 5th years that could open up space. Add the 6 Sr's. and McMillan and you have 14 spots. 15 if Barrett goes pro. That is really tight.
I could see a transfer or two for playing time and injuries happen but I don't see much more. Going to make this very interesting. I'd hate to lose out on the players we are in on due to numbers but I think Meyer will earn his money this year with all the hard choices and conversations.
What the hell does a MSU bagmen bring? A roll of nickles, carton of cigarettes and a pre-licked lollipop?