Ultrabuckeyehomer's picture

Ultrabuckeyehomer


Member since 04 October 2010 | Blog

Helmet Stickers: 192 | Leaderboard

Voting Record: 42 / 15

Favorites

  • SPORTS MOMENT: 1990 Reds World Series win. Being at the 2002 Michigan Game a close second.
  • COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYER: Eddie George
  • COLLEGE BASKETBALL PLAYER: Jim Jackson
  • NFL TEAM: none
  • NHL TEAM: none
  • NBA TEAM: none
  • MLB TEAM: Reds
  • SOCCER TEAM: none

Recent Activity

Comment 19 Oct 2014

Just curious, would you bet your life savings on Minny beating LSU? How many points would give me? 

Look, it's not helpful to be upset at all the things others think. We win and we're probably in. All this other anger is a waste of energy. 

Comment 16 Oct 2014

I was wiling to deal with the VA tech loss when it happened, but as time rolls on, I am more and more perplexed. Wow. That is a bad team that beat us. How were we that bad defensively? 

Comment 28 Sep 2014

actually Thom would be rooting for the Buckeyes... He's an OSU homer if anything. I listen/watch my reds and he loves our Bucks. Probably tempered a bit yesterday, given where his bread is buttered. But I would be willing to be the did not want the Bucks to go down 

Comment 23 Sep 2014

His good buddy and AD at Auburn was the AD at Cincy at the time. Bab witcock or some shit. That's how he ended up in KY north. Remember, he left a power conference gig for another one. That rarely happens. And when it does, it's because the folks know each other. 

Your overall point is valid, though. But Purdue had no "in" with Tubbs

Comment 23 Sep 2014

Couple of observations: 

1. Tubbs didn't put anyone on notice... What was he supposed to say? "I'm concerned we'll shit the bed and fail to communicate?" 

2. The shoe can be extremely loud, but it doesn't happen as often as we like to think. Personally, the 2002 gamble return is the loudest I've ever heard it. I wasn't at the USC game, but have been there for all other night games, save Va Tech this year.

That return was louder than when we secured the title shot against Michigan later on that year... The Tostitos flowed that night and it was grand. 

3. I went to the iron bowl in Shula's last season (astute readers will notice something here). My buddy and future business partner at the time is a huge AU fan, from Jasper AL. I had promised him for years that I would go. I couldn't believe how loud it was. And these were two teams going nowhere. Granted, it was the iron bowl, but I had been to several "The Games" and never heard a stadium that loud.  I've been to HV, AA, and Madison (thanks you a-hole lee Evans!) and was embarrassed at how loud a stadium in the south gets with two bullshit teams compared to up here, although I never confessed it at the time.  

It is different in some places, that's all. 

Our tailgating wins the cake compared to T-town (and anywhere else for that matter), hands down. But stadium hostility isn't even a factor for us, normally. Which is why teams march in to the shoe and beat us at night more regularly than most want to believe. 

But we normally win with more talent. And I prefer that. Remember, Miss St allows cowbells for crying out loud... How well has that noise worked over their history? 

Comment 15 Sep 2014

There is a lot of truth in the problem of luring southern kids north, unless you are OSU, Penn state, Michigan. We still rip kids from FL and GA, and we did it before Meyer. But I don't think we need to get southern kids north in big numbers to get better. 

Population shift is not the reason the league has gone down. Take a look at the population of our states. Are people saying we had to have 10 times the population of AL, Arkansas, Miss, S. Carolina to compete? We're still much larger than most southern states. 

Ohio, penn, ILL, Michigan are still huge states. Plenty of athletes for our premier programs to be nationally competitive. This may not be the case in 2 decades, but right now, population shift is the lazy answer. It doesn't explain the decline. What does, IMO, is coaching staffs. 

Comment 15 Sep 2014

I disagree with your new conference idea, but totally agree with everything else. The BIG has never been solid up and down. In fact, historically, no conference has. It is only recent that the SEC has become so deep. 

Our top programs have to win. That's all it will take. 

Comment 15 Sep 2014

Count me in the group of folks that believe it only matters about the top of our conference. The best programs have to beat other name brands. Until then, forget it. No one would care about Illinois or IA struggling if Mich state, Michigan, Wisconsin and us had won. Hell, 2-2 would have probably worked as long as the loses we're respectable. 

IMO part of the problem started when certain programs believed they should be better than they are. Minny fired Mason and ILL fired Zook (who brought in athletes). Those programs ought to be thrilled with 6-8 wins and a bowl bid. Once these programs get to that level, don't run off a coach because of one or two bad years. You are what you are. That's why IA needs to stay the course. They aren't getting back to 10/11 win seasons again. 

Michigan state is solid for the foreseeable future. NE is fine. Penn state, Wisky are TBD. We will be fine. It's Michigan that is at a cross roads. These are the 6 programs we need winning. And I think three are uncertain. That's my biggest concern. 

Edited to correct my lol math

Comment 29 Aug 2014

Has he refused to change positions? Maybe this will cause him to, if so.

He was never going to be a NFL QB, folks. I don't know why people ever thought so. That's not an easy thing to achieve, and his throwing motion was always suspect. Could he be a receiver? I don't know. But, why not try? 

Comment 20 Aug 2014

What a weird year now, trying to compare it to anything other than tat gate and coming up with nothing... Our NC hopes are probably gone (I hope not, but reality is reality) but we can still win the Big Ten, finally!  Who knows how this will all shake out, but we didn't hold open tryouts for QB, did we? These guys are good. Recruited for a reason. Are they NC good? I doubt it at this point. But, who the hell knows.  It will be a hell of a ride, though.. 

Comment 19 Aug 2014

You made the right call. I too have never had any interest in twitter. He'll, I can't even tell who is saying what to whom on those things. Not worth the effort. And fake JT is just another reminder of how stupid a medium it is. 

Comment 13 Aug 2014

I don't care who RS or not. It's a crapshoot, as always. Let it play out folks. The best will play. That's a distinct difference between the current regime and the last. Seniority doesn't matter. The best will see the field. I'm in favor of this attitude. 

Comment 26 Mar 2014

I would mostly with this... I think the Big ten has a shot being 3rd or 4th, but not number 2. If we are hanging our hat on IA, PSU and NE to make us stronger at the top, that's a bit too much for me to believe. Those are wildly vacillating programs year-to-year. We have two programs guaranteed to be good: us and Mich St. Everyone else is a crapshoot. The B12 and PAC whatever are likely stronger. I hope I'm wrong, but recent history says we're above the AAC and maybe the ACC. 

Comment 20 Mar 2014

Two things: the game was a microcosm of the season. Inconsistent play all around, even from the seniors. But, the people criticizing Matta are crazy. Yes, we list sienna a few years ago and yes we lost today. But how many times has he led us to the sweet 16 and beyond? Only 16 of 300 plus teams can get that far and he's done it more than once. This is the longest period of consistent success this program has had. We usually make the tourney and usually win a couple games or more. It's hard to win a title. Think Dean smith and Roy Williams and Boeheim before they finally got it done. Matta is the right man for the job. 

Comment 19 Mar 2014

It's a good team that will likely lose to Duke. If they get past Duke, they definitely fall in my mind. A good year considering the best pro prospect is out and they started slow. Line most, I'm obviously more concerned with my bucks, but those complaining about an article re: Michigan must have become bucks fans relatively recently.  Most of us are usually interested in what's happening up north. It's the nature of the rivalry. If you don't care about what's happening at/with Michigan, you must be john cooper 's kids. He didn't care much either. 

Comment 16 Mar 2014

While I know it's very difficult to cull the field down to this number, I cannot fathom how every president isn't included in the politics bracket. We have more than any other state and, in politics, is there a higher ceiling? My only beef with the list. Although I think Fraze and Patterson should have made the science/business bracket as well. 

My two cents: grant needs to take it home. We may not have an America we know without his appointment by Lincoln. And, he did it drunk! 

Comment 28 Mar 2013

while agree with you that people negative of craft and matta (which is common here) are idiots, it;s not like you played sports at a higher level than  any of us. I wouldn't pull the "never probably played anything" card on the internet ... you are faceless, nameless and without credibility to questions anyone else's athletic  achievements 

Comment 28 Mar 2013

it's clear, the tourney is not about defense, which no team is allowed to play ... we have to keep scoring to win. this isn't the big ten, they won't allow either team to play defense. Arizona simply missed in the second half, it had nothing to do with out defense. we didn't play better defense, because you are not allowed to. we have to keep scoring to advance. the tourney is about offense plain and simple.  we scored in the second half, that"s the  difference. 

Comment 24 Mar 2013

i thought it was a bad call, personally.  But, it did not cause OSU to win.  why the outrage over that one call = Barkley.  That was a horribly officiated game, and that was one of the bad calls, with almost two mins. left in the game.  it should not be getting as much attention as it is.    

Comment 21 Feb 2013

okay, my two cents - i have been reading/commenting on this site since sometime in 2008 ...I love this site (although the registration and voting is stupid).  However, you can't post clearly political content and expect no reaction from the idiots.  the president speaking at TOSU, not political, I agree. Saying kudos about a gay/lesbian initiative (or whatever you want to call it) on the part of the university, very political.  for johnny or anyone else to say otherwise makes them either disingenuous or dumber than dirt (and they know it).  Just accept what happens when you make such posts.  Period. its not difficult at all. If you don't want political commentary (I know I don't), then don't make political statements.