They just better hope Mount Union doesn't offer him
He is an athlete but I am thinking more D2 or MAC Schools
Sounds about right for Purdue
Tevin Coleman under 100yds rushing
Weird, ESPN says something nice about the buckeyes and all of the sudden everyone starts spelling their name correctly and referring to them as the world wide leader.
Will the first question be "what would you say you do here?"
My prediction is we get 5 more guys who are talented and contribute to the team in the future years.
Anyway, he has some nice things to say about JT Barrett and says that he's the key to the game
Seriously how could you not spell his name right?? it's J.T., show the man some respect and include the periods.
Is everyone just going to start throwing a fit everytime they find a typo on the internet? Relax man.
Then using logic Marshall should be 3rd in the country since all other teams have a loss and they do not. Good luck figuring how to rank teams when there are 3 1-loss teams who all beat each other.
But if we can't protect the QB (Urban's words) then we won't have the time to run any downfield routes and leaving an injured QB to be vulnerable to the pressure. Again Herman got conservative because he had to, to keep Barrett from getting killed on drop backs. When our line is in control then we can dictate our own play calling. When the other team's line is in control then they dictate our play calling.
By that "Logic" Arizona should be ranked ahead of Oregon. Each team has one loss and Arizona won the head to head. I think that proves your "logic" is very flawed.
For me it was more the eye test, watching Bama play as of late they look real good. Ole Miss I just don't trust Bo Wallace. As far as bama ahead of Ole Miss, I think that win by Ole Miss while impressive was more of a fluke. Bama wins that game 7 out of 10 times and I feel Bama is simply a better team.
This brings up an interesting point to me. The importance of the 1-4 order for who plays who in first round. Although your match-ups are the same as mine it will be interesting to see if the committee does some rearranging based on the match-ups they want to see or would be the best. For instance making sure miss st. and Alabama don't play each other in the first round or they do to gurantee an SEC team in the finals. Will be interesting to see.
I felt the same way, it was a hard hit, and lately any hard hit is deemed illegal and flagged.
Perfect example of how you legally blow a player up. Head to the side shoulder into the chest, arms wrapped around the receiver. This should be shown to every player on how to tackle. Absolutely love it.
Maybe you need to contact Urban and let him know your services are available. Where have you been the last couple weeks when the offense was putting up 50 and 500?? Maybe the Penn St. D was just that good and Herman did what he had to, to protect the lead? No need for us to just chuck it up and see what happens, this isn't NCAA 2014. Barrett wanted the ball he wanted those runs and not all of them are called for him, they are read options where he decides to keep it and in OT it worked. They ran it right down Penn St. throats for 2 TD's
Maybe this will paint the picture a little better for you...
Ole Miss's toughest OOC opponent... Boise State. Win
Michigan State's toughest OOC opponent... Oregon. Loss
Mississippi State's toughest OOC opponent... South Alabama. Win
Ohio State's toughest OOC opponent... Virginia Tech. Loss
Alabama's toughest OOC opponent... West Virginia. Win
Minnesota's toughest OOC opponent... TCU. Loss
Auburn's toughest OOC opponent... Kansas State. Win
Nebraska's toughest OOC opponent... Miami FL. Win
LSU's toughest OOC opponent... Wisconsin. Win
Wisconsin's toughest OOC opponent... LSU. Loss
Texas A&M's toughest OOC opponent... Lamar. Win
Iowa's toughest OOC opponent... Pittsburgh. Win
Arkansas' toughest OOC opponent... Northern Illinois. Win
Northwestern's toughest OCC opponent... Cal. Loss
You do the math.
There I think that makes the math a little clearer.
I think Polls are a necessary evil. Preseason polls I consider to be more an educated guess, based on what a team did the prior, who they return, who they lost, and who they have coming in. I agree 100% with your logic of a team dropping because it lost and moving a team up when it wins. Perfect example is Notre Dame. They play the #2 team in the country down to the final minute and lose on a slightly questionable call. In my mind if anything ND should have moved up in the polls to #3. They showed in that game that they are every bit as good as #2 team, but because they lost to a high ranked team that means other teams are now better than them? That's dumb logic
So basically what your saying this year is only FSU has a good win this year with a win over okie state and ND? and nobody else has beat anybody else of note. If this is true I feel bad for the state of college football that no real good teams exist.
Dude, we only beat Iowa by 10.
My apologies they were 7-3 I missed the vandy game. So your going to ignore Wisconsin, Iowa (two B1G teams), and Okie State? Doesn't help that B1G lost to Syracuse, K-State, LSU, Clemson, and South Carolina. And if you count Maryland and Rutgers you have losses to Notre dame and Marshall. The B1G had one quality bowl win MSU over Stanford. I will say Nebraska over Georgia was a good perception win but Georgia barely had a team left by the end of the year with everone injured.
Agree whole heartedly with this comment. Sometimes one team just plays completely out of their minds. VT did that on that night in the shoe. They played above any level they will ever play again this season