Here is my big contribution to this sad issue:
If it's harmful, then it is a big deal. Or am I missing something?
If I'm following you, alcohol kills a lot of people and we have accepted that, so weed should be dealt with in the same manner because it kills less people, and isn't as dangerous.
My example is tragic... and personal. I get that if it were legal to smoke, it would be illegal to smoke and drive (above a limit), but I don't get the good that comes from legalizing another intoxicant so we can have even more of those examples - but pot users seem to be very committed to that. Makes no sense to me, but, then again, maybe brains with plenty of THC have higher understandings and insights into that logic.
My guess is that he did stop, but not soon enough. I'd bet his agent was testing him and he was showing positive, so diluting was the least damaging course. While a diluted sample is treated as a positive, there is still a degree of plausible deniability.
Oh, one more thing that's pissing me off - the whole "weed is no big deal thing". It's a big deal to me because in November 2015 a 21 year old kid who was way high on it fell asleep on a back road and killed another 21 year old young man - who was like a son to me. If you want to sit in your LR and be a pothead, knock yourself out. But don't tell me weed is harmless. I know how much damage it can do, and the proof is over there at the graveyard.
I have enough drama. Kid makes a decision, doesn't need coddled, and just takes care of business. Bodes well for his future in Cbus.
I couldn't believe it when I saw this article. I have never had the hate for scUM basketball as I do football - except when they have had characters like Ramzy mentioned. This years team - with the plane thing, how they were playing in the B1G tourney and early NCAA, I just liked what they were doing as a team on the court. And I can't manufacture any dislike of their coach. Damn it.
I texted my buddy a week or so ago and asked this question, "I know the answer, but is it wrong for me to like watching this scUM team?" He gave me the answer I anticipated, but Ramzy, nonetheless, verified that I wasn't the only one conflicted between what is right and what I felt.
As for the NW, IA, MSU, and Illinois teams cited, I have always resented those guys because Ohio State had better talent (and better everything) than those guys, but they had some magic that trumped what OSU had. I always felt that there was a bit of illegitimacy with them because they were not the better team, but ended up at the top of the heap with the aid of sorcery/magic/luck and/or scheduling inequities.
That PSU team, taking my biases out of it and looking at them solely as a football fan, was one of the best and most talented teams I have ever seen. So, they are legit in every way - and I hated them for it.
When I read that Gerald and Clark were out this morning, and understanding that the program is still 1-2 over the limit (depending on a gray shirt of the K), Alex was the guy that popped into my head as next. I watched him in HS. Certainly a great player, but with the guys Urban is recruiting at WR, he was going to probably never break into the 2 deep.
Wish him the best, and hope he lands somewhere that he can thrive.
I looked at the roster, and if there is one or two more to go, I'd expect it to be a TE or CB.
Could we please play those SOB's in some decent weather? That's all I'm asking.
There is some undefinable balance that has to be achieved in play calling when playing from ahead in the 2nd half. You have gotten the lead, commonly, by making big plays via the passing game and running game (which makes either/or easier) OR you have gotten turnovers, some fluke plays, and/or some defensive/special teams scores. Regardless, you have to decide whether to keep trying to make big plays, or to try to run clock and be happy to punt.
If you got the lead through aggressive/riskier play calling ("When you throw the ball, only 3 things can happen, and two of them are bad"), do you try to expand the lead by what got you there, or do you play it safer and run the ball to shorten the game, forcing the other team to make big plays in order to catch up and win? I don't think there is a right answer. It depends on your team's and the other team's mental state and whether your team is comfortable executing a more conservative game plan.
A lot of games have been won by imposing a run-the-clock-be-happy-to-punt-rely-on-your-defense running game on the opponent. I give you Jim Tressel, Mark Dantonio, et.al. Many games have been lost trying, but failing, to do that. I would only point out that the essential element of football is aggression. Some teams are mature enough to handle playing with different levels of aggression. Other teams struggle with that. Some teams can do it with 8 min or less left in the 4th qtr, but can't with 8 min left in the 3rd. The wisdom or foolishness of going to it depends on how a particular team can handle that at the place in the game where it is gone to.
While I understand this dilemma in football, I couldn't coach dogs to bark, so I would tend to defer to coaches who are in a better position to know what their players are capable of handling. At the same time, it is extremely hard to watch your team lose a game they had a lead in when they become conservative, risk-averse, and tentative when they were winning the game with aggressive, more risky, and bold play calling.
"Holy Buckeye" still gives me chills. It happened when I just watched it there. No lie.
Why is it I have this feeling of excitement mixed with angst when I hear a recruit say, "The University of Ohio State"?
From what I can tell, Zach Smith is very good at recruiting and using twitter. Some are not so sure he is as good at coaching WR's - and that's going to be a negative recruiting point until it changes - either Zach becomes known for excellent position coaching or some other school comes calling. They say in business to not hire anyone you can't fire (friends and family). I'm not sure Urban can move Earl Bruce's grandson on to greener pastures, so this might be an issue for a while.
Zach is Earl Bruce's grandson, and my gut tells me that nothing will be done with him until Earl goes on. Zach is a very good recruiter, and we know how much Urban values that, but I don't see much development going on. Actually,. I don't see any. I love Earl, but the program has to come first. Zach needs to go somewhere and learn how to develop receivers. I would thank Studs and let him find somewhere else to coach, and move Warriner back to OL. I have never read one thing, or seen one thing, that makes me think Beck is worth a damn, so I'd send him packing. Then, Urban needs to find an OC with an imagination, and an ability to whisper in the ear of QBs and get results.
But then again, what do I know? I do know that I will be disappointed if that entire staff is here by spring practice.
I went to last year's Fiesta Bowl with my son. My bro-in-law and sis live in Phoenix and he offered that if we fly ourselves out, he would buy the game tickets. I didn't want to go (see below), but my son said it would be a once in a lifetime father-son thing. We flew out on New Year Eve, went to the game, and flew back on the 3rd. It was fun. I liked the stadium and the whole experience.
But the TV experience is just too good. I've been offered free tickets to big B1G games at Ohio Stadium, and turned them down most of the time. At home I can sit in my leather recliner, eat my bean dip, drink my cheap drinks, and be able to see everything that is going on in high def on a big screen. If I'm hot, I can open a window. If I'm cold, I grab the remote for the gas fireplace. There are no obnoxious people around me, no drunks to deal with, and it costs me zero to park. I can yell and scream, throw my hat, or do whatever I want. And when the game is over, I walk up the stairs and go to bed.
I guess there is something to be said for "being there" when Ohio State wins a big game or a national championship, but in terms of cost, comfort, and taking in the game, give me my recliner and man cave.
Other than Curtis Samuel's talent & speed, and maybe J.T.'s short-yardage ability, do you see any other elite weaponry on the offensive side of the ball?
Not really, but I sense there are some that are capable of becoming that. Nominees would be Baugh, Brown, Hill, and McLaurin. And it's hard to tell when the passing game involves synergy between protection, receiver, and QB. We might be surprised what it looks like if, say, the protection is better.
And what would Mike Weber look like in an offense that is stretching the field more and with better lanes to run through? It's a team, or at least an entire unit, type of thing imo.
I think it was an SI article I was reading where an opposing coach was saying in a critical tone: "He (Weber) isn't Elliot. He doesn't scare you."
1) Zeke is a once in 20 year back, so not being him would include a lot of really good backs.
2) Mike didn't get the carries that feature backs do, and still topped 1K.
3) That OL he was running behind hasn't performed as well as some other backs at Ohio St and elsewhere have enjoyed.
So, trying to be a little unbiased and balanced, the guy did very well with the touches he received, but he probably can work on picking up his feet, reading the lane, getting skinny when necessary, and getting a little more break-away speed, but if he improves marginally over the next couple of years, I ain't complaining that he's not Zeke.
Newcomers is a place that has had some hard times. Would love to see them have something that may draw some people in there. Their HS is in the same league as my kids' district, so we are very familiar with it. I have stopped and seen the Cy Young memorial they have there.
It has easy access off of I-77 about 2 miles west on SR 36.
Woody also has a tie to New Philadelphia, also in Tuscarawas County. He coached there at the HS for a couple years. The stadium is named after him.
They are unbeatable.
Some pundits when asked to rank their playoff teams said: 1, the Alabama defense, 2, the Alabama offense, 3, the Alabama special teams, and 4, Nick Saban."
They should be pretty ripe, especially if they destroy Washington.
Then something happened on the way to the coronation...
I think several things are going on here, some more impactful than others:
1) OSU fans have short memories. Remember 3rd and 23 in E Lansing in 2014? JT dropped a pass to Devin Smith that was perfect. If he was trying to put the nose of the ball in the top of a pop bottle, it was that kind of throw. He threw a lot of accurate passes that year, and intermittently since.
2) Difference between then and now? Better protection, route running, and timing.
3) 2015 cost JT some confidence, I suspect. He was the man, then he wasn't, he pressed some, and it took him a lot of games to get back to playing at a high level. Then he makes a mistake off the field that brought one of his best attributes - leadership - into question.
4) This was the youngest team in CFB at the beginning of the year. They are uber talented, but there's no substitute for experience - which they are in the process of getting, and they are still one of the best teams in the country. Football is the ultimate team game, and whether they look like world-beaters or not so hot, what Urban says is true: "The QB is a product of those around him."
5) JT is a college QB, and his running ability and decision making on option plays is what makes him special. I run into a lot of fans who view him through an NFL lens, which negates those attributes, and focuses on what he can't do well or consistently.
6) Who's name is all over the passing and TD records at Ohio State and the B1G all-time TD's? With a year to go! It's best to not take that lightly because the books say this guy is one of the best ever, and we should get down on our knees and thank God for the day Tom Herman urged Urban to bring him here, sight unseen, because we are going to really miss him when he is gone.
I asked Wisky to do this one thing for me, they do it for a half, and then they do what they did in the 2nd half. Another reason to dislike them.
Yep. Neither is Hoban in DIII. Too many college DI players for most teams in that division to compete with. Hoban's only loss, I believe, was to St Ed's 10-7. That tells you where Hoban should be playing. The OHSAA did their little competitive balance proposal, and it improved the situation, but did not fix it. The source of the problem is not public vs. private but more large urban vs. small town/rural districts and has to do with the QUALITY of players a school can attract, not the quantity. The competitive balance policy they have in place now only addresses quantity. If a school gets 10 5'6 130 lbs juniors who run 5 flat 40s transferring in to their program it does not create any advantage for that team, but one stud QB does. Until the OHSAA addresses that, we are going to have this.
That is a dynasty in small school Ohio football. Incredible.
I'm happy at 4. CFB has always been about arguments, controversy, unfairness, etc. - and it's awesome (until your favorite team gets left out). I look at it this way: schedule at least one strong OOC game and then win all of your games. You will be in. EVERY POWER 5 SCHOOL CONTROLS ITS OWN DESTINY BY WINNING ALL OF THEIR GAMES If you schedule the Sisters of the Poor and the directional schools and you don't win all of your games, or if you don't win all of your games regardless, you put yourself into the place where you have to win a beauty contest with other schools.
If expansion occurs, I'd be for 6 with the 1 and 2 seeds getting a bye. All champions get in, plus an at-large or Group of 5 team. Might need to do away with CCGs. The B1G champ game is embarrassing anyway unless Ohio State or scUM would be in it because you have a half-empty building. Is it really generating that much money? If it is, it's from TV revenue.
It would make sense - except we already have 2 DCs. I also think that L'ville is a better representation of who CS is as a coach than Texas. When they hired him, I was like, "Huh. Didn't expect that." It just didn't seem like a good fit. It was obvious he wasn't the first choice, or maybe even 2nd or 3rd, and it just never seemed people were behind him there. I think he will get a job as a head coach somewhere, but if we have an opening and he wants to, I'd love to have him here.
I agree, but I wanted to keep the door open for him to come back as a head coach here when Urban steps down. Who knows whether we would want him in that role in 5 or 10 years, but right now he would be high on my list. I felt it would be easier to pull him away from LSU than Texas. On the other hand, it seems that most coaches that go to Texas get hired by fat cat boosters and fired by them, so maybe it wouldn't be that hard after he has a dose of that to deal with. Regardless, it would come down to his affinity for Texas vs. his affinity for Ohio State - and there's no way to know what that would be in x years.
I remember Taylor Decker throwing about a dozen "look out" blocks against that LB from Buffalo that is now in the NFL. Taylor recovered and turned into a pretty decent player. :)
Ohio State is a very young team. Gotta give them time to learn and grown, and sometimes they have to learn the hard way.