Terwilligins's picture


Member since 29 February 2012 | Blog


  • SPORTS MOMENT: Matt Sylvester graduating
  • NFL TEAM: 98 Madden Seahawks with Joey Galloway
  • NBA TEAM: 90's Bulls
  • SOCCER TEAM: USA women

Recent Activity

Comment 06 Jan 2013

Problem is when you lose players like Sully and to a lesser extent, Buford, you need to either backfill with immediate-impact recruits or rely on improvement from returning players to retain the same level of play. We don't have any impact new guys, and from what we've seen I think it can be argued that only one returning player has improved to any noticeable degree - Shannon Scott. Several players, IMO, have actually regressed from last year - notably Craft and Lenzelle.

So we lost a lot and gained little to nothing (I can't be pursuaded that Ross has become a real contributor yet). Combine that with what everyone is pointing out as a lack of floor leadership, and the falloff is considerable.

Two things to keep in mind, though - 1) there's still time for guys to improve this season and you have to believe that's at least possible for Amir (why hasn't this happened yet?) and Craft (based on the fact we've seen him as both an offensive baller and floor leader in the past); and 2) there was a ton of concern and frustrated threads last year about leadership and consistency, and we landed a few plays shy of the NC game.

Comment 14 Nov 2012
@Bobcat which two last cycles? You're saying 2011 (Thompson/Scott/Williams/Ross/McDonald) was a bad class, or are you calling that on 2013 well before it's over?
Comment 09 Nov 2012
They should just go streetball style on the original ship deck. Less cost/effort and I have to think those things are designed for traction. Would be sweet to watch too.
Comment 17 Sep 2012
Greg: "It's a cardinal, man." Guy: "I'm not so sure." Greg: "Ohio's state bird. Indiana's too. I know a cardinal when I see one." Guy: "Where's the red feathers?" Greg: "It's a female, man. Different plumage, not as showy. Where are you from?" Guy: "Denmark. God I love Ohio"
Comment 25 Mar 2012

Another thing I assume is pretty obvious but maybe it isn't - the offensive importance of the Willie B threat. Watch how defenders play Scott when he's in - they sag and can help down low. Not the case with WB. Coaches dedicate resources to his threat because they know what he's capable of, regardless of how often he actually goes off. The result is an inability of whoever's guarding him to concentrate on much else.

I don't care if it's Willie's offense or the ghost of Willie's offense - if it causes problems for other teams' D, I'll take it.

Comment 25 Mar 2012

I think Willie has been of real value in this tourny. Value can be measured on defense and the glass just as much as it can on offense, especially when your team is already loaded with players providing offensive value. A hole on defense can be much more detrimental than a hole on an otherwise talent-loaded O. Willie has been inefficient and at times absent-minded on offense. Yes, I get nervous when he gets the ball. And when Jay Bilas calls Buford "clutch" (he's done so at least twice in the past month, probably more) I get pissed because it seems absurd. But without WB's very, very clutch boards against the Zags, a huge 3 when we most needed it against cinci, near shut-down D on Joseph after the first few minutes against 'Cuse and a few clutch free-throws to seal it, yes it's very possible the Bucks don't head to NOLA this weekend. I mean, I get it and don't argue, his offense is simply bad right now. But to argue that he hasn't been a key part of the Buckeyes success this year, including the tourny, is wrong. We're headed to the Final Four and Willie owns part of that.

Call me silly but if Buford goes 0-10 in a loss next Saturday, he'll be the first guy I'll want to thank Sunday morning for all he's given to the program. If he goes 0-19 and we lose, I might reconsider...