smokeybandit's picture


Member since 03 July 2011 | Blog

Helmet Stickers: 113 | Leaderboard

Voting Record: 0 / 0

Recent Activity

Comment 26 Apr 2015

It won't be banned because they'd need to change a current rule, a rule that the majority of schools  support, even D-1AA schools (since it was the Ivy League that first proposed the rule, albeit for slightly different reasons).

What I can see them doing is banning guest coaches' institutions from publicizing the coaches' appearances at these camps.  Only the host school can publicize who the instructors will be.

Comment 26 Apr 2015

It's not a loophole, as the rule says coaches can work at other camps in any capacity and at any location.  The rule was implemented  in 2010 and no SEC school  opposed the passing of the rule.  Note that in the below text, "noninstitutional" means "not the institution you work for" Noninstitutional, Privately Owned Camps/Clinics—Bowl Subdivision Football. [FBS] In bowl subdivision football, an institution’s coach or noncoaching staff member with responsibilities specific to football may be employed (either on a salaried or volunteer basis) in any capacity (e.g., counselor, guest lecturer, consultant) in a noninstitutional, privately owned camp or clinic at any location, provided the camp or clinic is operated in accordance with restrictions applicable to an institutional camp or clinic (e.g., open to any and all entrants, no free or reduced admission to or employment of athletics award winners). However, employment in such a camp or clinic is limited to two periods of 15 consecutive days in the months of June and July or any calendar week (Sunday through Saturday) that includes days of those months (e.g., May 28-June 3). The dates of the two 15-day periods must be on file in the office of the athletics director.

Comment 13 Apr 2015

That tattoo will look just great once he's done with football and no longer has those biceps.  Reminds me of that old SNL skit and tramp stamp tattoos.

Comment 04 Mar 2015

People have to remember that the stipend amount isn't established by or for athletics.  In determining a school's total cost of attendance (for general student population financial planning/aid purposes), there are four factors: Tuition/fees, Room/board, books, and transportation/personal expenses.  NCAA scholarships traditionally only paid for the first three.  The stipend is simply the fourth transportation/personal expenses line.  This varies across schools for various reasons.  It could be transportation costs to and from campus (which is likely why PSU's is a lot higher).  It could be anticipated health care costs not covered by a student medical plan.  Plenty of other things, too.  

I've seen some articles suggest some schools could try to influence this value.  I just don't see it.  Schools don't want their total cost of attendance to increase as it could steer away the students that actually pay tuition.

Comment 16 Nov 2014

"When Penn State agreed to a four-year postseason ban and massive scholarship reductions in 2012, no one could have imagined that it would be in a bowl two years later. "

Actually, many imagined it.  Keep an eye on the news, as the emails that the NCAA had to hand over to the judge on Friday are likely to show that the sanction reductions were planned from the start.

Comment 09 Nov 2014

What happened to PSU?  They started the season with 1 guy on the offensive line who ever played a meaningful snap, including 2 guys who were defensive tackles only a few months before.  That translates to no running game and a beaten up, shellshocked QB, which doesn't bode well for putting points on the board.

Comment 05 Nov 2014

The "bluff" didn't work.  They expected PSU to either resist or cave.  They did neither.  PSU actually said, "sanctions?  Don't mind if I do!"  This is just the tip of the iceberg of a much bigger political scandal.

Comment 21 Oct 2014

I think the notion of a rivalry is passe.  The internet and instant access to everything means every game is as publicized and accessible as the next.  Rivalries were born out of an era when the guy in the other side of the town or state happened to be a fan of the other school.  And you never had contact with anyone outside of that area.

Yes, Ohio and PA border each other, but there never was that old school "hatred just because" that some of the classic rivalries have.  OSU is a big game each year for PSU fans not because of a rivalry, but because OSU is often one of the top 2 best teams on the schedule that PSU (or any B1G team) plays each year.

Comment 02 Oct 2014

Penn State is at a bit of a crossroads.  There's just enough game film out there now that teams know they can sell out to defend the pass and it won't affect defending the run or getting to the QB.

If they can figure out something, anything, to keep Hackenburg on his feet, they'll still be tough.  But, if NW can give a blueprint on how to defend PSU, then every other team will be able to, too (except for maybe Michigan at this point).

Comment 24 Sep 2014

"Being allowed to think about getting bowl eligible is nice for Penn State, but I don't think the Nittany Lions will be much of a factor in the conference title race given their offensive line and defense"

Their defense is #1 in the country in rush defense and top 10 overall and in scoring defense.

Comment 30 Jul 2014

PSU is getting more sanction reductions in September.  Everyone knows this.  So these guys (and Jim Delany) are getting out in front of it for some good PR to take "credit" for the reductions.

The sanctions and reduction there of have been the plan all from the start.