As a lawyer, your assessment of lawyers depends.
A defense to most of these lawsuits would be assumption of the risk. Which is if a plaintiff voluntarily engages in an inherently dangerous activity and they are injured due to the inherent, known risks of the activity then they are barred from recovery. There is even a seminal case illustrating this doctrine that involved an NFL player who was injured while playing. I cannot remember the name of the case being that I took Torts I almost 5 years ago.
I am also unsure what current and former players are basing their arguments on. I think it has something to do with the NFL's failure to properly inform them of the risks associated with playing football (a somewhat tenuous argument if you ask me).
I will trust Pete Carroll on tackling technique. I do not trust Pete Carroll with play calling on 2nd and goal with less than a minute in the super bowl with the best short yardage running back in the league.
I am always torn with this topic and I have an unpopular opinion on the subject. Having played football at a competitive level for a significant portion of my life I feel that as long as players are made aware of the risks and proper tackling is taught, the game does not need to change. I feel for those who were not instructed properly or made fully aware of the risks and have suffered injuries similar to Kevin and Steve. I suffered several severe injuries while playing, including a grade 3 concussion and I likely suffered numerous small ones.
Football is inherently unsafe. If you do not want to play it, that is perfectly fine and I have total respect for you in making your decision. However, if I choose to play this game and put myself at risk that is my choice and I don't think that others who are concerned for my safety should change the game.
I find Perry's comment very interesting. I wonder if this is just a concern or something the team is actually dealing with.
I am a tax attorney focused on credits and incentives. Super exciting.
This video helped shed some light on the leadership of Curtis Grant. Just guessing because Apple is on a treadmill, but I believe the speech was before the MSU game.
No. Unless you consider every student who receives a scholarship an employee. Because of my goals and the requirements to maintain my scholarship I regularly had 50-60 hour weeks for school. Then I worked two jobs to help make ends meet. My position as a student did not make me an employee, so neither are these players.
See my post above, if you think Gene Smith getting an 18,000 bonus for a championship is offensive, you don't understand how a large portion of the real world works. The revenues at my firm are significantly larger than those of the NCAA and all other athletic departments combined and my salary is less than the value of the scholarship/services these players receive. Plus I have a mortgage as my student loan payment.
Players are being treated more like adults than they realize. The reason schools have access to certain personal information is because they are trying to monitor the amateurism of the sport and the school is trying to comply with the rules that are in place. You want the PRIVILEGE and OPPORTUNITY to play college athletics on a scholarship? Then giving the school access to your personal information is a small price to pay.
It is a choice. I choose to work for my employer. If I have the OPPORTUNITY to become partner I have to grant the firm access to all my financials because the firm has to be compliant with state and federal laws and regulations in order for me to be partner. The firm can and does monitor my "private" social media accounts (social media is almost by definition not private), and I can be fired if they feel my social media account is inappropriate and does not represent the firm well.
I paid my own way through undergrad, my JD, and my MBA via scholarships, student loans, and working two jobs. I chose to have student loan payments. I now have a job where I am billed out to clients at between $400 and $500 dollars an hour, I see less than one tenth of that as my after-tax salary. I would likely be laughed out of the room, my competency seriously questioned and perhaps let go if I asked the partner for part of the profits he earns because I feel like it is unfair that he gets all the profit that I worked for.
Can't really be upset with West Chester University. The contract clearly states the rules and the University is correct, there insurer will not pay since the half court shot was on the second attempt. Sucks for everyone involved.
Still feel like Norwell was snubbed. Hopefully he uses it as motivation.
I had thought about basketball, but the powers that be at the NBA would never allow players to skip a few weeks in the middle of the season to play in the Olympics. Wrestling does not have the same issues in switching as basketball and the NBA.
Yeah, I understand that when you are that level of competition a sport is not longer really "seasonal" and becomes an all year process. I would think that more exposure and increased popularity for the sport would be more important to the wrestlers than a fun location.
Fair point regarding mingling with the beach volleyball players, but have you seen some of the skiers and snowboarders from nordic countries and the women's curlers? They give the beach volleyball girls a run for their money.
Also, I don't think building a separate facility for wrestling would be too costly. Or maybe they could repurpose one of the ice rinks once skating is finished.
Thanks Curt, I always enjoy hearing a little about the wrestling bucks. Also, a somewhat random question, but what are your thoughts on moving wrestling from the summer to the winter Olympics? There are significantly fewer events in the winter Olympics and wrestling is a winter sport. I could see the switch helping wrestling gain more exposure.
All the JO's still exist.
I would say as long as its blueberry. I thoroughly enjoy a good rhubarb pie a la mode.
I bet you wouldn't say that to Ryan Shazier's face.
FormerBuck, could you shed some light on why it is an ego hit? Redshirting says nothing about your abilities or potential.