My friend who is a very recent band alumnus said that the people in charge of branding want everything associated with Ohio State to use the same logo. The band is still allowed to do the "diamond Ohio" entrance formation, but aren't allowed to use it on their uniform or merchandise anymore.
You have no faith in Zach Smith just because our WRs don't catch 150-yard games every week.
It's not about having no faith in Zach Smith, but moreso a testament to Hazell's time at OSU under Tressel.
The 2005 and 2006 WR corp was the strongest group of WRs I have seen at Ohio State in a long time. Plus the 2010 offense was phenomenal, and it was rumored that it was because Hazell took a much larger role in the offense that year, and Jim Bollman was only the offensive coordinator by name/loyalty at that point.
You're right, I goofed and mixed up MAC QBs. I guess I meant, Spencer Keith who had 2241 yards and 18 TDs that year.
In any case, in 2 years as head coach Hazell got a 5-7 team to a 11-3 record. I thought that was a decent offense, and turnaround job at Kent State, but he just couldn't repeat it at Purdue.
I thought the offense Hazell ran at Kent State was pretty innovative, and it got Jordan Lynch in the Heisman conversation for a few weeks.
Hazell did not run "TresselBall" that was Jim Bollman.
Not that Harbaugh deserves to be paid more than Urban, but I can understand the logic behind it. M*chigan has a legitimate fear of losing Harbaugh to the NFL, so they have to pay him the "market-value" for an NFL coach instead of a college coach. While $7 million/year puts Harbaugh as the 2nd highest paid coach in college, it would only be in the top 30% of salaries for NFL coaches.
I started reading "M*chigan Mondays" last season, and Gerdeman is pretty much the only thing I read on O-Zone. I'm sure the other content on there is fine, but 11W's pretty much has me on all other facets.
I think a big factor is how much Herman wants a big payday as well. Houston made Herman the highest paid G5 coach in the country last season with a $3 million/year contract, but even that pales in comparison to what a lot of P5 programs can pay their coaches. For example, Kentucky hasn't won anything of note for years, and they are able to pay Mark Stoops $3.4 million a year.
Granted if Houston makes it into a P5 conference, and Herman gets his $5 million bonus + whatever his re-negotiated contract ends up being... It is a moot point.
Personally, I hope Houston joins a P5 conference and hangs onto Herman. Not only does it signals Herman's continued success at Houston, but also gives Ohio State a better shot to pull Herman back if Urban decides to hang it up in 4-6 years.
Do you not think Ginn would have made a similar impact as a true freshman playing CB? I would assume that Ginn would have still had kickoff and punt returning duties as a CB.
I mean Ginn Jr. could have played CB and still returned punts and kicks for TDs.
I honestly have no qualms about Ginn making the switch, and I doubt that Ginn regrets it at all. I just wanted to see if there was a reason the switch was made. It just seems odd that you would take the #1 rated CB out of high school, and have him play WR, especially when Ohio State just lost an all-time great in CB Chris Gamble.
Definitely not arguing that Ted Ginn Jr. hasn't had a fantastic career so far in the NFL, but moreso just musing if it could have been even better as a CB.
I mean, it is no secret that Ginn's biggest weakness as a NFL WR has been his inconsistent hands. Ginn has the speed, athleticism, and route-running abilities of an elite WR, but even last season had major consistency issues actually catching the ball. Imagine those same physical tools and mental understanding of routes on the defensive side of the ball where he can just swat a pass away instead of catching it.
Bradley Roby came into Ohio State at a similar weight and size as Ginn Jr., so with a college conditioning program, I don't think it would have been an issue for Ginn to get to 180-190lbs.
The way I see it, the 2012 and 2013 defense was not because Luke Fickell was a poor defensive coordinator, but because Withers' had a conflicting defensive philosophy. It was ultimately a poor fit and hire by Urban Meyer, who doesn't "miss" very often when choosing asst. coaches. Withers had a great resume coming into OSU, but Fickell and him were never going to see eye-to-eye on how the defense should be coached. Fickell had the title of "defensive coordinator," but if your "co-DC" is coaching the back half of your defense to play a high-risk/high-reward mindset while the other half of your defense is super conservative, you're going to have a discombobulated team overall. Chris Ash coming in fixed a lot of it because Fickell finally had a co-DC that was on the same page as him.
In my personal opinion, Shaq isn't in the discussion because he never broaden his game.
Don't get me wrong, Shaq dominated the NBA for a good decade or so, but imagine if he had developed a mid-range game like Duncan, Yao or other dominant big men, or keep improving his FT% like he did in 2002 instead of letting it tank again. It would have probably boosted his career to a ~28-30+ ppg range and made him a more legitimate challenger to Jordan for the GOAT title. Instead Shaq relied on his insane strength and athleticism for the major of his career until it failed him with age/injury.
Personally, I wouldn't describe Bosa "slipping," but rather scouts/media have started to study Oregon's DeForest Buckner and NFL teams' needs are becoming more apparent. So it more that Buckner got elevated to Bosa's level, and not Bosa dropping.
Buckner was overshadowed in the regular season because of Oregon's overall piss-poor defense, but their fans will be the first to tell you that Buckner was no way at fault (I've seen a lot of them describe their defense this year as "Buckner plus 10 friends"). If you go back and watch Oregon's games this past season, you'll see that Buckner faced a ton of double and triple-teams as well. It was mostly because Buckner was Oregon's only respectable force on DL, but he still managed to rack up 83 TLKs, 17 TFLs, 10.5 sacks, and 5 PDs as a DE/DT for them.
Bottomline, Bosa and Buckner are both far and away the elite prospects in their position groups, and teams will probably have to flip a coin between the two.
This is my pick as well. Perry has been the linchpin of the LB corp for the past 3 years, maybe out-shined by his fellow teammates in Shazier and Lee in terms of hype, but never outworked or outproduced by them. Adding on Perry's A+ personality as a model student, citizen, and leader. I think teams would be foolish to let Perry slip past them in the 2nd round.
Any team that needs a gritty, high-motor LB should be jumping at the chance to get Perry. Especially, a team that is lacking a 3-4 ILB.
1.5 years... but has all the top-3 spots for numbers of 3-pointers made in a single season (4 of the top 6 spots).
The most common criticism I've heard for Bosa is his speed. A lot of scouts have been pegging Bosa as a "power guy" with really great hand techniques, but they are wary about him being able to push around NFL-caliber OL as easily. So in the situations where Bosa can't "bull-rush" an OL, they think that he lacks the lateral speed to simply run around them a la Von Miller.
Bosa can challenge that perception by dominating the cone and shuttle drills at the Combine, but even if he doesn't I don't think he needs elite speed to be successful in the NFL. JJ Watt is known as a "power guy" and he built his DPoY career on relentless, unwavering effort on every single snap. If Watt can't bull rush an OL, then he just looks to bat down the pass, chase the play down from behind or just attack will with the same intensity from beginning to end to wear his opponent down. Bosa will just need to adopt that same high-motor focus and mentality, and he has shown that he will in college, so why not the NFL?
6 RBs taken in the 1st round during the last 5 drafts
- 2011: Mark Ingram (28th overall pick)
- 2012: Trent Richardson (3rd), Doug Martin (31st), and David Wilson (32nd)
- 2013: None
- 2014: None
- 2015: Todd Gurley (10th) and Melvin Gordon (15th)
So... 3 "impact" players in Ingram, Martin, and Gurley; 2 are no longer on a NFL roster in Richardson and Wilson; 1 injury-stricken rookie in Gordon.
CAN you get an RB with world class speed, elite athleticism, excellent vision, outstanding blocking at all levels and the hands of a wide receiver in a late round?
No, you can't, but with how often NFL teams are moving to a RBBC approach, you can be really successful without one. How many workhorse running backs do you really see in the NFL anymore? AD, Todd Gurley, Doug Martin, Devonta Freeman and...???
It just doesn't seem like a necessity anymore when you have really successful teams like the Patriots (Blount, Lewis, Bolden), Bengals (Hill and Gio), Steelers (Bell and Williams), Chiefs (Charles, West, Ware), Cardinals (C. Johnson, Ellington, D. Johnson) and Broncos (Anderson and Hillman). So instead of investing a 1st rounder on a "do-it-all" star RB at a position that is historically known for short careers, they can just find multiple running backs that can come in during specific situations.
I think the 2007-2008 secondary as a unit was underrated nationally. You had the Thorpe Award winner in Malcolm Jenkins, but I feel like the other 3 starters are usually an afterthought for most people: Kurt Coleman, Chimdi Chekwa, and Donald Washington.
That was probably the most dominating Buckeye secondary that I've seen in my time as a fan.
Damn... I knew IMG was talent-rich, but it honestly didn't hit me until seen all 13 of those guys compiled together. Really simplifies why Harbaugh is so hardheaded about having a camp there.
Hopefully Urban can maintain the St. Thomas Aquinas pipeline and solidify an IMG one.