raiderred's picture


Member since 25 June 2013 | Blog

Recent Activity

Comment 02 Oct 2015

I don't get why my comment got deleted. I just corrected Tyler Green's rating. The same thing happened when I did it on the offensive recruiting recon and corrected Indiana's 2014 record.

Comment 20 Sep 2015

Dude chill. And why are you calling him out using his entire name as if you were his mother or something. He's one of the best in business and seems like he's always highly respected from the recruits. He's not putting the kid on blast or anything for wavering on his commitment possibly. He's just stating his opinion of what he thinks is going to happen based on info he's gathered and everyone here appreciates that opinion. He keeps us well informed in what could be happening in OSU recruiting. Its not disrespectful because he's not saying it's bad Hill is reconsidering his options. He's doing it in a respectful manner. So just stop talking.

Comment 12 Sep 2015

BGSU is the real deal though. They are really good. I think they were tied with Tennessee midway through the third. They are gonna beat Purdue whenever they play. Roger Lewis whose a stud was a former OSU commit. 

Comment 09 Sep 2015

No problem. I noticed the CB the other day and got pretty excited. They need a tall rangy receiver. Victor is the one thing that is missing in this offense unless Gibson fills it this year.

Comment 09 Sep 2015

Hes not even considering the seminoles man. Its really between us, Tennessee and Florida I think. But definitely not the noles

Comment 15 Aug 2015

Hes an iowa legacy I think so its gonna be tough to get him.

Comment 29 Jul 2015

I agree that he does deserve some form of punishment for failure to cooperate but to give him four games is ridiculous when there is no hard evidence. He should at most get two games if not one. Its unbelievable that he has the same type of punishment as greg hardy. And the repeat offense should only apply to the patriots not Tom Brady himself. 

Comment 29 Jul 2015

Im not gonna lie, I am a pats fan so I do have some bias. I still find this to be ridiculous though as the suspension is being made on speculation of probable cause in the report. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? Furthermore, the minnesota vikings did a similar act of heating the balls on there sideline and got caught with video evidence!!! That is proven guilty right there. So I just find it ridiculous that the pats were targeted here. Why should the Patriots get punished when the Vikings did practically the same thing? Its clear that the Patriots were clearly targeted as there is no hard evidence that this is true. Could it be true? Definitely. But we don't make punishments based on speculation in the court of law so why is it happening here?