I don't know if scouts put more stock in one or the other, but prospects typically look better at their pro days than at the combine. Times are normally faster. Quarterbacks typically look better as they're throwing in an environment they're used to, typically to receivers they are comfortable with.
I really like our use of the 1-2-2 press. It's a nice way to control the tempo, the 2 guys in the back make it a relatively safe press and maybe most importantly it seems to give the team a little extra energy.
1) He might not be telling the truth. Letting the players make the announcements for themselves?
2) The coaches probably have a pretty good idea on who may leave early without knowing who has actually sent in the paperwork.
There are so many good things happening on this play.
1) The work by Bosa, described in the article.
2) Tommy Schutt pushing the center back and to the playside, forcing the runner to cut back and keeping the pulling guard from getting up to Perry.
3) Raekwon beating the block of the left-guard and waiting in the hole with Lee and Perry to take down the RB.
I think part of the reason that Nebraska was able to recruit well in Texas in the past is because they would play Texas, Texas A&M, Texas Tech and Baylor every year. Probably harder to sell a Texas recruit on coming to Nebraska if you're never playing in Texas.
In our last two losses, the inability to adjust is glaring.
Not defending the performance of the offense in this game as it was one of the most painful-to-watch games I can remember.
A little perspective on the about quote though:
In between our last 2 losses were 23 consecutive wins with an average score of 41-18
Kyle, is there any pattern as to when we use the "Rushmen" D-line package and when we go to the 3-3-5 look? Both seem like they would be used in passing situations.
The Buckeye Defense is currently #13 in the country in points per game and #19 in total yards per game. I'm in agreement that there is real room for improvement, but overall I think the defense is in pretty good shape.
Anyone's opinion on how uniforms/clothing looks is purely subjective. I am one who thinks the main uniform should never be drastically changed but like the idea of an alternate uniform1 week a season. I haven't liked all of the alternates and was unsure about the idea of the all black but I thought the team and stadium looked awesome last night.
I keep seeing a link for "The Worlds 10 Most Beautiful Women" with a picture of Sloan from Entourage and haven't minded one bit.
The reason he would leave Houston for Maryland is simple. Because of conference affiliation an undefeated Maryland team is a virtual lock to be in the playoff, while the same can't be said for Houston.
I really enjoy the Film Study articles Kyle does, and any X & O's articles are great.
What NorCal, I believe, was referring to was breakdowns like this:
Then there were also the Film Study articles as well.
These 2 articles together were great at showing what happened on the field the previous week.
According to CBSSports.com Jalin Marshall has touched the ball 115 times since the beginning of last season and fumbled the ball 5 times. That means he fumbles on 4.3% of his touches, which didn't seem like a lot to me.
For comparison though, Zeke has touched the ball 414 times since the beginning of last season and fumbled 4 times which is 0.97% of his touches.
A simple but effective rule for reading run/pass is the "hi-hat/lo-hat" rule.
Attacking LB’s and overhang players with RPO’s (Run/Pass Option) is a big part of IU’s offensive scheme.
Couldn't RPO's make the "hi-hat/lo-hat" rule ineffective? Offensive line run blocks, slot receiver runs a route and the QB reads the safety.
It sounds like Indiana's offense is going to be pretty much the same thing that our defense sees in practice every day.
Shotgun and Pistol formations, 11 personnel, inside zone, buck sweep, flash and bubble screens as constraint, RPOs, deep shots off playaction... sounds like the Buckeye offense of the last couple years to me.
Something additional I noticed on both of these plays is that the left guard slides over to the right side of the line in pass protection. Is this to make the linebackers hesitate or come up to play the run, even though nothing the QB or RB is doing sells the playaction?
This exactly. As Kyle explained in his last Film Study, mental mistakes are really killing any offensive momentum. Multiple bad snaps by the center, or a good snap that is mishandled/fumbled by the QB, have thrown off the timing of plays. Illegal motion, holding, and false start penalties have negated positive plays or put the offense behind the chains seemingly every drive. QBs have missed open receivers, everyone is missing blocks, receivers are running routes short of the first down.
Mental mistakes of all kinds, from every position, are what is slowing this offense right now.
Colorado left the Big 12 for the Pac 12 just a couple years ago. I don't see them moving back. Cincinnati and BYU I think make a lot of sense for the Big 12 though.
I think the point is not whether being in the Big 12 would help UC recruit better. It's that playing in Ohio more often will make it easier for teams in the Big 12, like Texas and Oklahoma, to recruit in Ohio.
I could see Cincinnati as a fit in ACC. If Notre Dame becomes a full-time member of the conference they would need another team to even up the divisions. UC would fit in geographically with Louisville and Pitt.
The Big 12 could also make sense if they look to expand and want a geographic rival for West Virginia.
It seems to me like one of Barret's strength is making the correct decisions on time, both in the option-run game and the run/pass option packaged plays. Maybe we'll see more of both if JT is the full-time starter.
I think if Barret is named the starter, that we may see less of Braxton at Wildcat-QB. With Barret already being a decent running threat, there is less of a need to move Braxton there for QB-run plays.
It was mentioned in the article that the sweep play was called often to some success and the multiple penalties and other mental errors kept it from being more successful.
Additionally, the Buckeyes regularly called for the crack-sweep that many of us know so well from its success in the Sugar Bowl.....
But the success of this concept perfectly captures why the Buckeye offense struggled so much that afternoon. On the game's opening play from scrimmage, Samuel galloped for 25 yards with this exact play-call, only to see it negated by an illegal motion penalty
I don't know about the specific scheme our secondary is playing in any of these examples. The general idea though, is that on 3rd-and-long the defense will gladly give up a short completion allowing the defensive backs to come up and make the tackle short of the first down marker. If your DBs are not consistently making that tackle than that's obviously a problem, but I believe this is the general idea.
There are 11 players listed here as WR in the depth chart, plus 2 at H-B and 3 at RB. Is this just a reflection of how many players are likely to see the field against Hawaii, or does the depth chart normally show 16 "skill-position" players?
A couple things I find interesting:
1. Marshal and Wilson listed as WR not H-B
2. Torrance Gibson not one of the 9 WRs listed here. Is this still injury related?