I would be rattled if the Lunatic Fringe was coming after me too....
Nobody wants to see a picture of 05's naked derriere....
I don't trust people who don't follow their own directions, so I had to make sure there were no oral issues...
Two-parter: Are your gums healthy along with teeth pearly white and straight? Is this the same with your staff?
Has anybody else seen the irony that is Rudock leaving Iowa for TTUN and the next season the Hawkeyes go undefeated through 10 games, but TTUN has multiple losses?
Did anyone actually read the article?
I did... and the fact that it was complimentary is the only reason I posted it... I don't post trolling click-bait...
That's not my call... I don't think it should be anybody's call but the "Booer"
Not a fan of anybody telling somebody else how to be a fan...
I would accept almost anybody else for that role... few exceptions, Russell Crowe (as you stated), Christian Bale... you know who would be great?
The answer is: Yes
Clayvis? HAHAHAHA! I love it... that should be added to the 11w vernacular.
Did anybody else notice the blatant non-calls against Clemson and the ridiculous borderline at best penalties against FSU? Seems to me like FSU got those calls last year and that, to me, questions the integrity of the officiating in the ACC. The higher ranked team gets the borderline and non-calls? That reeks of a mandate to ensure a spot in the playoff.
Why would anybody here click on any of his articles anymore... it's called "click-bait" and you got hooked.
It's more expensive, but I want my boys to play hockey. There's always a risk of head injury in contact sports. I'm not sure there's really a huge disparity in % of players getting concussed when comparing fooseballin' to hockey, but I feel like hockey would be safer. Maybe because they don't permit hitting in youth leagues.
95.5 The Game is always advertising seeking digital sales positions.
I am not sure where I asked to review all missed calls. Penalties, missed or called, is not the crux of the issue; a player was clearly down with possession; the conference stated as such; the game should be retroactively ended right there. That is not a judgement call. There should be no retroactive action if a call is made or missed based on a penalty rule interpretation; that for sure could cause endless appeals and litigation. There is no interpretation needed for a player being down with possession.
PI is a judgement call. A knee down with ball in hand is black and white. I asked why can't a call be reversed retroactively when there is no judgement to be made, there is no grey area in this case. The 2002 Fiesta Bowl PI is a judgement call, plain and simple, as are holding penalties. A rule with ZERO judgement needed was missed so it should be reversed after the fact. Penalties are almost always judgement calls.
I completely suck at photoshop, but I would love to see somebody alter the ground where the knee is and make it dip a good 3 inches (or approx) below the knee and caption it with "What Miami fans saw"