I did this a few times last year, I might have to revisit.
I agree with this when you have more than two sources of data, unlike this case however where we're just looking at pass vs. run.
Good catch, it should definitely be 17-83, split.
I wish I didn't sleep on these.
Dat HDR filter.
Thanks guys. Should be correct now.
Thanks for the kind words. The rushing stats were ridiculous. Purdue actually had a negative net average in the second and third quarters. Each dot represents about 3 yards so really there shouldn't even be anything there during those quarters; this just looks more esthetically pleasing.