14 of those 31 points came in OT when OSU started at the 25-yard line
Both clips are from the 1961 TCU game:
I'd like to point out that the Chicago pizza comment was pointed right here, for my pointed criticisms of Columbus' pies. This is a regular topic of conversation amongst 11W writers, though, and Johnny is just using his bully pulpit to make a point. Sad!
That said, Donato's pizza is trash.
I apologize for this, CW823, but come on, this line of thinking is just plain absurd.
Joe Burrow has thrown 28 career passes, all of which have come at the tail end of blowout victories (BGSU, Rutgers, Nebraska, & Maryland) that OSU won by a combined score of 259-16, and only 12 of those 259 points can be credited to Burrow.
This is not a knock on Joe Burrow. He may well end up being the best QB in school history for all we know, but right now he's only received the same coaching as the existing starter at QB. Barrett certainly has some warts that will be tough to overcome this far into his career, but the backup QB argument here is tired. Barrett is CLEARLY going to be the starter, not because of loyalty from the staff, but because he's still the best option.
There is a reason Texas fans were hoping he'd transfer.
See you there, coach
You're correct, JT looked left first based on the number of defenders, which is what he's supposed to do. In fact, they're motioning Weber out of the backfield to create that discrepancy and make it easier to get Curtis the ball.
OSU already uses plenty of it, and I wouldn't call it controversial by any means. Almost every school in the country uses RPOs at this point.
Fair point re: Wilson, but I think the expectations of a nose tackle for fans is different than what coaches expect. Playing nose is the least glamorous position on the field, as your entire job is to occupy as many blockers as possible. Shooting a gap at that spot is almost a detriment at times since it virtually guarantees a blocker will be able to get his hands on an inside linebacker.
Even though someone like a Wilson might be athletic for his size, every defensive coach in America would rather the linebacker be the one left unblocked in the hole. That's why guys like Big Hank and Dexter Lawrence at Clemson play the 3-technique spot, despite being the desired size of a nose.
Yeah, the concept of zone blocking had been floating around in playbooks since the 50s, but no one made it an underlying philosophy, mastering it and finding ways to run it against any look the way Gibbs did in Denver.
It's also worth noting that he was Woody's final offensive coordinator ('75-'78), although he didn't commit to the zone scheme like this until he got to Denver in the mid '90s.
See the top comment
Excellent point. I've never understood why Meyer shied away from reading the OT/TE double, given that his backs read C/G combos all the time. My only guess is the additional footwork that has to be repeatedly drilled. It will be interesting to see if this different style is included in the spring game, because if they aren't teaching it then, then it likely won't be taught at all.
True, so I'd expect OSU to use an unbalanced line with both tackles to the backside, creating that same cutback lane.
Was more a statement of scheme than results. Schiano made the unit far more dependent on man-schemes than Ash's quarters principles. Not a statement on results, though.
Shhhh, that's coming next week...