Nothing yet...Pretrial hearing was rescheduled for September 8th.
Hoke said Kalis will be back to full practice on Monday so should not miss games because of injuries.
This is correct..Kalis was held out of recent intradquad scrimmage because of back injury..so he wasnt listed with the starters. But Hoke had said there was no question Kalis was leading at RG before the injury. He said it was minor injury but you never know with back injuries.
Regarding the walkon question in original post, Glasgow started at C last year and was originally a walk-on but was on scholarship last year. Glasgow had started at guard for first couple games before switching to center. His position this year will depend on who else is in the best five as he has versatility to play a couple positions.
Everyone on all the M boards feels he should never play a down again and think that will likely be the end result.
York is already suspended indefinitely and he is not at fall camp or participating in any team activities as a result. I think most dont feel there is a harm in at least following through with the legal process and any formal school process as long as he doesnt participate in any team activities in the meantime. If the right decision is made in the end, there is nothing wrong with waiting until everything is investigated correctly to make that final decision...as long as he is not participating in anything in the meantime.
Yes - thats him (now he is a BTN analyst too).
I was also pretty confused with why DJ had an issue with this. Ray was basically saying that right now MSU is OSU's biggest game now so if anything it could be read as an insult to Michigan. The first part was him just saying that MSU has what OSU wants, which is the B1G title that MSU won last year, so for now at least MSU is the big opponent for OSU.
The issue is they dont have time to send the tickets out so they send them via email so you can print it out. But they do allow you to pick them up directly at the athletic ticket office if its a problem to give your email to get them electronically. Not to mention I assume most of the people getting tickets for this will be season ticket holders who they already have their emails.
I know you are just giving this a hard time because its a Michigan thing but some Michigan fans are using the same arguments as above which I cant understand. You have to admit that its just Michigan fans whining as even this argument is solved by picking up the tickets,
Yeah.. I used to just have no avatar but I felt like half the time I had to write the line "From a M fan's perspective" or had to identify myself so somone didnt think I was trying to pose as an OSU fan while giving some info from the Michigan side. I finally realized it was just easier to put that M there so there was nothing hidden.
You arent alone..there are a lot of Michigan fans that also have that bias and have complained about this event for some reason. Yes - the cynical view is that this may be largely a PR move to generate goodwill from the fans. But isnt that what a fan of a team should want - for tha AD to have events that will generate goodwill from fans?
DJ was incorrect in his summary above. Michigan is NOT issuing assigned seats for the event - ALL of the seats are general admission. This explains why it is a benefit for season ticket holders to get in 30 mins earlier as they can claim better seats in that time. They are making you register to get the tickets just so they have a sense of the numbers for crowd control, etc.
I dont understand why there is any hate for Brandon for this (some Mich fans complaining also). 1) They are giving out free tickets to a scrimmage, 2) they are letting the first 300 student season ticket holders who sign up get to watch from the sideline, and 3) there is free parking in all university lots near the stadium.
I understand sometimes why people complain about him...but this is free and has free parking. Other than an outright bias against everything he does, what is the complaint here?
Any insight on how "cost of attendance" will apply to all of the sports that have partial scholarships (where the limit is on sum of partials allowed as opposed to sports like football where all scholarships are full)? In first line, it mentions full ride scholarships so perhaps it wouldnt even apply to the other sports. Currently the only sports that all full ride are football, mens basketball, womens basketball, womens volleyball, womens tennis, and womens gymnastics so makes it sounds like it may only apply to those sports. For sports like baseball where a player may get a 1/2 scholarship I didnt know if it wouldnt apply at all or maybe they would get 1/2 of the cost of attendance stipend.
Agree with you that abolishing the NSD making little sense. Allowing recruits to sign at any time just sounds like we will see scenarios where coaches are trying to pressure someone into signing it before they really think it through (even if there is small cooling off period of 48 hrs like Pelini suggests). There is really no upside to a kid having to go to a school that he no longer wants to attend. That said, i do think an early signing period would be good as it would force the issue of allowing official visits earlier than fall of senior year (which would be a good thing for B1G schools to get visits from recruits in south and west).
Sounds like Fitzgerald wasnt too pleased about how it went down.
Hand's tweet is getting some negative feedback now...
@bomani_jones: if a coach wants to pull an offer over social media, fine. but broadcasting that stuff on twitter like that is so unnecessary.
i would term it as "coach claims to drop prospect for his social media presence" rather than prospect actually dropped. Sometimes things like these are more trying to deliver a life lesson message to recruits and its a more effective message if recruits hear a message that they can miss out on a scholarship. Whether a prospect was actually dropped in this case, we will never know.
Hand apparently thinks it is of value to send this tweet out either as a lesson to recruits or to show people that the PSU coaching staff values morality and ethics. His tweet then has that same value even if the dropped recruit thing never actually happened.
I think there are varied opinions on him. I think you probably are very familiar with the snarky blogger type view from mgoblog writers but he has done alot of positive things in terms of investing heaviliy in nonrevenue facilities and the student athletes love him. At the bottom of this, I linked some comments I made last week in a thread about Brandon here as it gives a different perspective than the complaining you mainly hear. I think when it gets down to it there are alot that have similar opinion to what I wrote in that link (which is generally positive) and then some very negative opinions (mgoblog writers and the viewpoint that gets the most noise in the press).
At the heart of it, I think Dave has created a much larger athletic program both on the revenue side (squeezing more revenue out of football) and on the expense side (heavily investing in upgrading every single nonrevenue facility and has added sports. He has made it an emphasis to improve the experience of all student athletes of all sports. So I think a fan's opinion of him will somewhat be colored by what they value. If all you care about is football, then you look at higher ticket prices and a subpar record on the field. If you value the athletic program in its entirety, then you put value on softball, volleyball, etc and you recognize that he is improving all the facilities by raising the amount of revenue raised from football.
If you are interested in the Brandon saga, there is an extremely long, candid interview with him in the Detroit News today (link below). He addresses many issues including how the schedule got changed to face MSU on road twice in a row, the fireworks, the skywriting, Hoke's status as coach. This is the first time recently we've really got Brandon's extensive views on some of these issue and he admits some mistakes. I criticize mgoblog often on their coverage of Brandon as i think they rely on criticizing one line quotes from him (often out of context) and never consider the full story.
There is no security/waiting time there. You can apply for an account and post 10 seconds later.
Im surprised he was able to do such a good job getting around the system as the security here is pretty tight. One thing I like here is how you have a "cooling off" period for any new members so it takes a couple days to get your login credentials as this eliminates trolls who just come over to write some garbage after a loss or after a big recruit commits. By the time it takes to get the login those type of people have lost interest.
In addition, I have a good story here as to when I applied for a user id here. I applied for the same user id as I have over at mgoblog (where I am also a reasonable poster) and I quickly learned that Jason must cross-check against mgoblog user id's. After a few days of not hearing anything back about getting login credentials, I sent a message to check on the status. I received a nice message from Jason back that I was denied as all the message said was: "The simplest answer is that we reached our UM fan quota for this quarter. Please try again later." My email account was a generic gmail account so the only way he could have possibly known I was Michigan fan was checking that user id against mgoblog names. A few months later I wanted to comment on another article so i tried again (with a new user id) and it worked.
I went back and found the email from April 2012 and confirmed it was you that sent it. Great line.
Well done...the sole reason i clicked on this topic was I knew someone would post this video and i would get another chance to watch this thing..."We've got a big drum"
Here is the highlight video you mentioned...
Of course I agree - if the same oddsmaker has a big difference between the individual game and the division odds, then that implies a big difference in MSU's chances against other teams on their B1G schedule vs OSU's chances. I find it hard to think there is that much of a difference if the head to head game is a toss up. That said, they do face Nebraska in a crossover game that OSU doesnt have so that would account for some of it. The odds arent too far from saying that even if MSU beats OSU, then there is still 40% chance OSU wins the B1G.
Agree 100% with Vegas making odds to make a buck and to manage risk. Futures odds like these are less played by professional gamblers (who play individual games more) so they are more influenced by fans. If there are going to be more OSU fans betting this than MSU fans, then for sure the odds would be shaded away from the "true" odds since more money would come in on OSU at the "true" odds. That is how one makes a market and manages risk. If they are expecting to get too much money on OSU at "true" odds, then of course they would move the market to entice people to put money on other teams to spread their risk.
My point was that the line on the MSU/OSU game alone seems very disconnected from these division odds. I wasnt really taking any view on either team.
MSU odds seem to be undervalued relative to OSU for both B1G and division.
Especially the division odds...to break even if you made a bet, those odds imply OSU has 71.4% chance to win division and MSU a 27.8% chance (will add up to over 100% for all teams because of juice). That seems like a big margin considering the MSU/OSU game line is pretty much a toss up from what I had seen. There are alot more OSU fans than MSU fans so that line must be shaded fairly hard to reflect that.