I'm Ron Burgundy's picture

I'm Ron Burgundy


Fishers, IN

Member since 25 July 2014 | Blog

Recent Activity

Comment 27 Apr 2016

OK, I know we all love to hate the NCAA, but wasn't this ban a result of the conference ADs motion and subsequent passing vote?  It wasn't as though the NCAA itself operated in a vacuum here.  

Comment 16 Mar 2016

Great example. I think this team compares very closely to the last NIT team, with Diebler, Turner, Koufas, and Lauderdale as freshman. The next season they improved some, but probably not as huge as some will be expecting here in 2016. 8 seed in tourney and lost to Siena, but they then went on to I believe back to back B1G titles and a 2 seed and #1 overall.  Of course the tourneys didn't go as well as expected, but the point is the improvement was there in those players.  The thing that put them over the top was a top notch recruiting class to mix with in 2011.

This team should be given the chance to make the same improvement. Next year ought to be a top 3-5 B1G finish and a lock status for the tournament, but maybe not a high seed.  Then in 2017, with still almost the entire team back, they should really be a top 10 caliber team with a legit chance at a deep run.  If that doesn't happen, then the Matta criticism is fair.  The problem will be, this team is who it is for the next 2 years, with no room for an impact freshman to put them over the top.

Comment 11 Mar 2016

My only hope with Lunardi is that he isn't put out there so much that he actually some subliminal sway with the committee.  It drove me crazy during the home MSU game when he said OSU's non-conf was "awful and that's being generous".  It was and is much better than 75% of the other bubble teams.

He is not always right either.  Last year he had UCLA way out of the field, like around where he has OSU right now, and they got in. Granted, most people agreed with him that UCLA didn't belong in, but still. I guess the point is the committee can do some weird stuff from time to time, no matter what Joey Brackets says.

Comment 11 Mar 2016
I was at the game last night, and for some reason it occurred to me more than I had realized how big of a loss Tate is. Mitchell can do some good things out there and will get better, but he is zero threat on the offensive end outside of 2 ft. And even then it is questionable. Tate brought a lot for this team that wasn't great to begin with, so it is definitely an uphill battle. Kudos to Loving though, he has majorly stepped up since Tate went down. If not for him, I don't think we'd have any wins post Tate injury.
Comment 11 Mar 2016

With all the other bids that have been "stolen" and a quickly disappearing bubble, I would not put TTUN in the dance just yet.  IU was definitely the team I wish we were playing instead of MSU tonight.

Either way, this wasn't a good thing for the Buckeyes slim bubble hopes. It's looking more and more like we might have to win this tourney to get in. Although MSU + Maryland wins should probably get the job done.

Comment 11 Mar 2016

Haha this time x1000.  I honestly opened this thread, and saw the numbers and figured this was a thread to show Thad's performance in a positive light against some of his peers. Just not drawing the same conclusions based on the data presented.

Comment 10 Mar 2016

Considering the vastly used and known terminology is that a "higher" seed is the "better" seed, your choice to use the opposite undermines your credibility. You must not follow basketball very closely.

Comment 10 Mar 2016

That national championship by UCONN is the greatest example of how the NCAA tournament is a crapshoot and the best team almost never wins it.  They were a mediocre 7 seed who I believe won their first game by a point in OT. Then just somehow went on to win the whole thing. Is that coaching or luck? I'm saying luck. That was one of the strangest tournaments ever. I mean they got to play an 8 seed in the finals. Granted a woefully underseeded Kentucky team, but still.

Comment 10 Mar 2016

Definitely can't overlook PSU. They've been playing well enough to beat us if we show up with the B game. I expect a close game, but a win.

Tomorrow, who knows, maybe MSU will come out flat and finally miss some shots, even open ones, and give us a fighting chance. They've been pretty ruthless the last 2 times out.

Comment 09 Mar 2016

Yeah, for a moment there it seemed like Thompson was becoming a low post scoring force. Very efficient. And then poof, he's been all out of sorts offensively the last few weeks. Giddens is still raw, but you do seem him make an effort to get to his "spot" and get that hook up. He has been making a few more of them than earlier in the season. Still like the potential of both of them going forward.

Comment 09 Mar 2016

I am the same way. I almost can't not read it when someone says **spoilers** when it comes to the Walking Dead or Game of Thrones. But, I will say in this case, a good thing the show has done is mix it up from the source material. I base this off what I have read here and other places, have not read the comics.  So while it is known that Negan is going to do something very bad very soon, it could be any of a number of different characters who are on the wrong end of it.  And probably more than one.

None of which should be a surprise at this point in the show.

Comment 08 Mar 2016

I just really really want to see more of the H motioning into the backfield to a split back set, and then taking a more traditional handoff with either Dunn or Weber lead blocking. This allows the H to find a seam and get north south, as opposed to the jet sweep which seems too much east west and we rarely block it / seal it well enough for it to be a successful play.

Comment 07 Mar 2016

What's crazy to me is his ability to go slo-mo. It was as if every time a defender got close to him time stood still and the defenders became statues. Wow!

Not that I need to clarify, but I think highlight videos that go slo-mo at the most important part are lame. I would like to see those moves real time at game speed.. 

Comment 07 Mar 2016

I still think a win over PSU and then shocker over MSU puts us in.  Prior to losing @ MSU we crept into the first Four Out, so a top 125 win and a top 10 win would put us in.  Of course if we're playing well enough to beat MSU, then might as well win the whole damn thing.

Comment 03 Mar 2016

How does it feel to be #4?  There's only room for one Burgundy in this town.

Comment 03 Mar 2016

Switch. Switch. Switch everything.

We've got the personnel and length to do it. But with Forbes on fire, and Valentine playing so well, Sparty is going to be near impossible to beat on their home court on senior day.  It's a shame we didn't catch them during their struggles earlier in the season. May have been able to steal one. Not now though.

And of course if Iowa beats Michigan we're looking at #7 seed matched up with #2 MSU in the B1G tourney quarters.

Going to have to shock the world somehow.

Comment 02 Mar 2016
Yeppers, you kind of summed it all about this team. Inconsistency. The flashes and potential are there at every position (with depth), one just hopes another year in the program and they all can get more consistent. I don't expect much impact from the incoming freshman, since neither of them are one and done type talents. With the entire team returning, it will be hard for them to carve out any meaningful minutes. Despite that inconsistency, the impressive thing this team has done is not lose a single game it shouldn't have once B1G play came around. All they have to do is maintain that next year, and then play just a little better against the upper tier teams and it is easy to see an extra 5+ wins, considering some of those early losses we took.
Comment 01 Mar 2016

I was trying to figure that out myself, and the 2 primary things I can decipher is they have played a tougher in-conference schedule than us, and they avoided the 2-3 bad losses we have in the non-conference. Otherwise, their non-conf SOS is actually worse than ours. Their resume is basically us without losing those home games to UT-Arlingtion and La Tech.

Comment 01 Mar 2016

This would be pretty dumb. It's a short term fix, they'll never be able to stay ahead of it.  And the only school in the B1G who makes a division imbalanced is tOSU.  Any and all conversations on the "toughness" of the B1G East for the Buckeyes circle back to "beat MSU at home without their star QB" and then we wouldn't give two shits about the alignment.

Even if this did happen it would just change the MSU game to the week after TTUN in the B1G championship. Or even open the possibility of having to play them twice in a season.

Comment 29 Feb 2016

B1G tourney matchups will be key. Need to avoid having to play Rutgers/Minnesota and their SOS drag in the first game. Ideal team would be a Penn St. who should be an easy win but somehow has an RPI of 105. And then play pretty much anybody but MSU in the 2nd game. With so many teams tied down the stretch it is impossible to predict what the matchups will be. Should be an interesting tourney this year.

Don't look now but if TTUN loses at home to Iowa and has an early exit from the B1G tourney, they could be opening up a spot for us to take. Wouldn't that be nice.

Comment 24 Feb 2016
Even after last night, for the season opponents are shooting 32.6% from 3 against us. We are top 25 in defensive efficiency. So no, I will not admit that our perimeter defense is "atrocious". It's only truly bitten us in 2 games that I can think of, this one and @Wisc. But Buckeye fans are prone to hyperbole, so yes, we're beyond terrible. I will say this - our guards/wings are much better on ball defenders than off ball. We can lock down pretty well on people who are dribble drive dependent, but we definitely have some guys who struggle getting through screens and staying with their man off the ball. And that really shows against a free flowing offense with good shooters like MSU.