Loved this gif. This is my "Go to" move when I don't like what I'm hearing. Perfect for this article. Now, if only there was a particularly childish move for "I'm not seeing this."
My first thought when I saw the O-line depth was YIKES! But hey, they will come along. I'm looking forward to seeing them on the field in the coming weeks. I hope they get increased PT.
If not style points, how about credit for covering the spread?
My sights are always squarely on the Michigan game. I don't care what our record is. Beat Michigan, and it is a great year. I don't think I'll forget those Cooper years when we had title hopes derailed by inferior Michigan teams. Since then, I figure, if we beat Michigan the year is a success, regardless of the record.
Also, Urban will be beloved by this fan if he continues Tressel's dominance over UM. If he follows Cooper's path... great recruiting, great teams, overwhelming opponents on the field, but falls short in The Game... I think that will be a pretty miserable place to be again.
To me, B1G Championships, National Championships, and beating SEC teams do not matter as much as beating Michigan. Taking care of our rival is what satisfies, the other successes are nice, but probably won't even happen without a win over the enemy.
The only annoying ND image missing was Tom "used to be a boxer" Zbikowski. Musburger never left that out of his broadcast.
Your insights are great as always. Thank you.
I went with "Big" and "Ten"
Big important schools in one division, ten schools in the other division.
You decide how they should be split. New division names allow for the conference name to exsist without all the funny math, or counting jokes.
It also would help Mr. Delany find a few more big and important schools to add to the conference instead of adding the likes of Maryland and Rutgers.
No more ugly rich girls, lets add some hotties. (Texas, Oklahoma, Notre Dame)
I suggested division names: "Big" and "Ten". Big important schools in one division and the other ten in the appropriately labeled division.
Then the conference name would make sense again. I also would know the name of the division OSU would be in.
I also suggested they actually go big name if they continue to expand 1) Texas 2) Oklahoma 3) Notre Dame. I'd hate to see the first two go SEC on us. Notre Dame is just stupid. ACC?????
I'm pretty sure my ideas are not any worse than the current reality of the B1G?