Estrada's picture


Lookin' California, Feelin' Midwestern

Member since 30 August 2010 | Blog


  • SPORTS MOMENT: 1/3/2003

Recent Activity

Comment 08 Mar 2016

I agree about the defense, though additional wrinkles aren't a bad thing if the players understand an execute the current schemes properly.

As for the offense, we all saw the difference between the early/mid-season form and the close of the season when it was finally firing on all cylinders (when Warinner moved to the booth).  So I think the biggest change is that they've moved Ed up into the booth permanently (and hired Studrawa), which all happened prior to spring ball (i.e. basically after the MSU debacle).

Comment 05 Feb 2016

Abe Simpson dropping truth bombs...

Comment 06 Jan 2016

I have to disagree with the loss to MSU in '13.  Our secondary wasn't up to the task that year.  They had the talent, but until Chris Ash came to town our D wasn't quite ready to help deliver a Natty (the talent was there, just not appropriately utilized: e.g. Pitt Brown starting over Vonn Bell until the bowl game).

Comment 29 Nov 2015

It's plausible, though not likely, that the committee could leave UNC out even if they beat Clemson.  While people have (correctly) stated that last year our fate set a precedent (i.e. that conference champions from a conference with a championship game that only have 1 loss will still get in), Baylor's fate from last year is also informative.  Baylor was punished last year because of their soft schedule (at least partially).  You want a soft schedule, look no further than UNC which boasts 2 victories over FCS squads.  In addition they've bested 1 team that was ranked (Pitt was 23rd) when they played and 0 from the current top 25.  If you bust out the FEI strength of schedule, they're schedule is 117th most difficult (according to last week's data).

This isn't to say that they'd be left out even if they beat Clemson, but it may be more nuanced than just a binary decision.  Did UNC look awful as Clemson managed to finally Clemson themselves into a loss?  We probably have good shot.  Did UNC look like we did last year against Wisconsin?  Then UNC is playoff bound.  Somewhere in between?  That's where the rubber meets the road, but we'll still have a chance (not a great one, mind you, but a chance).

In the end I doubt it will matter; while Clemson may be more likely to lose than Alabama (against a Florida team sans offense), that isn't saying much.

Comment 04 Oct 2015

This is most of it, but not all of it.  There were a couple more:

3) Execution in the red zone.  Some of these were penalties, but there were also plenty of poorly executed plays (a glaring example being Cardale missing an open Thomas).  Both offensively and defensively they seemed to play mediocre to bad in the red zone (the defense's exception being at the end of the game).

4) 3rd downs.  We were bad on 3rd down yesterday (2 for 14).  The play-calling was sub-optimal at times (and other times downright confusing), and sometimes penalties contributed there as well.  During the magical 3 game stretch last year Cardale seemed to pull a rabbit out of his hat quite often on 3rd down (be it scrambling, throwing, or a combination of both), but he and the entire offense just didn't have it yesterday.

Comment 08 Sep 2015

I think VT certainly would have scored more with Brewer at the helm, but I seriously doubt they would have been able to keep pace with the Buckeye offense in the 2nd half.  So I think dodged a bullet is a bit too strong, rather we wouldn't have been able to get 2nd stringers reps as the game would have been closer (we also would have had to keep our foot on the gas as well).

Comment 22 Jan 2015

At least according to these sources he did not do so on the regular, so this could be where some confusion is coming into play:

Comment 15 Jan 2015

because it's clear they were hiring the demeanor more than anything - the "Anti-Bo," if you will,

Absolutely this. 

Will it back fire?  Who knows.  Personally I believe he will maintain the level of success Bo had, but not be able to surpass it.  However, that will be tolerable for Nebraska because Riley won't make waves (like Bo did on the regular).

Comment 29 Dec 2014

There's a decent number of us out in SD (though I'm current visiting family in the heart of it all), a large number of Californians are transplants.

Comment 16 Nov 2014

Indiana's offense most certainly would have been a challenge before Sudfeld (their starting QB) went down for the season.  Without him (and with Roberson and Coffman transferring; the other 2 QBs that played for Indiana last year), they've been starting a true freshman at QB and he's been terri-bad in Sudfeld's stead.  The game against Rutgers was the first time he's cracked the 75 yard mark since taking over the starting spot at QB.

Coleman is good, particularly given that he still manages to get yards even now that Sudfeld and any semblance of a decent passing game is gone.  But Indiana's Offense will likely make Minnesota's look incredibly dynamic and multi-faceted.

All that said, Cobb and Coleman are both good warm-ups for Gordon (though Gordon is better than those 2, and Wisconsin has a passing attack that's slightly better than Minnesota or Indiana's, but thankfully not much better).