What are the chances that Sprinkle's was not involved in the riot, and not in possession of an illegal substance, did not try to conceal said substance to avoid prosecution. I see that there are some who are sympathetic towards Sprinkle; if he is a victim in this situation this may be warranted and all rights, privileges, and titles should be reinstated without malice. But if he has any culpability in the events he is accused of should be prosecuted to the extent of his participation. I struggle to comprehend the expressions of sympathy I'm seeing, is this genuine towards the individual or transferred fear this may hurt the team's chances of obtaining a national title?
Comment 07 Jul 2014