Regardless, Clint Trickett has to be one of the most West Virginia names of all time. If the football thing doesn't work out, I'm sure he has a future in NASCAR.
I think the "he" is referring to the QB, not Gordon. Just a friendly misplaced pronoun.
Gary Andersen is a fucking idiot. Apparently he benched Gordon because he mouthed off in the locker room at halftime about the QB. Congratulations, asshole, you just threw a really important game and fucked up your best player's Heisman candidacy because you felt you had to put him in his place. Also, they did have 2 star D-linemen go down with injury in the 2nd half...did not help matters.
And this is why the B1G will constantly suck. Rosters that are on a knife's edge due to poor recruiting, and coaches that are glorified leadership camp facilitators rather than football game winners. Fuck you, Gary. Fuck. You.
Ha! No brainer.
Vandy has lost 11 of its last 15 openers....most of which were at home somehow...and many were against MAC or whatever teams. So not really.
To you who downvoted me...they were sucking at the time.
Rutgers is fitting right in.
I didn't post their season win totals from those years. You'd smell it through your internet cable.
Hey Rutgers, stop sucking, you assholes.
Well, this is what Vandy does opening weekend over the last 14 years (since I misread what you wrote about it being the last 3 years...since not even that registered as an analogous stat in my drunken haze)...
2000 - L to Miami (OH) at Vandy 33-30
2001 - L to Middle Tennessee St. at Vandy 37-28
2002 - L at Georgia Tech 45-3
2003 - L to Ole Miss at Vandy 24-21
2004- L to So. Carolina at Vandy 16-3
2005 - W at Wake Forrest 24-20
2006 - L at Michigan 27-7
2007 - W over FCS Richmond at Vandy 41-17
2008 - W at Miami (OH) 34-13
2009 - W over FCS W. Carolina at Vandy 45-0
2010 - L to Northwestern at Vandy 23-21
2011 - W over FCS Elon at Vandy 45-14
2012 - L to South Carolina at Vandy 17-13
2013 - L to Ole Miss at Vandy 39-35
How does Vandy get so many home openers?
LOL, is that really how they're framing it? I'm going to go look up what these teams are and then post it...need more tequila in my margharita, glass, though...be back in a minute.
Sigh...that game is like watching two children hit each other with socks.
Washington State is by no means a mid-pack Pac-12 team. In the last 4 years, they finished better than 1 conference win and a last place finish 1 time...last year, with 4 wins.
New verb: "Rutgering" It means to completely shit the bed after looking like you know how to play football in the first few minutes. Used to be called Spartying.
Horse collar AND facemask called on the same Rutgers player on the same play. Never saw that before. #soooooRutgers
is that Bama has been the dominant team in football the last 5 or so years.
I just got done saying that exact thing over on another thread this morning, actually!
If there was a 4-team playoff that year, I'm sure Alabama would have made it, and they may very well would have won it. 2 of the other conference champions finished with 2 losses (Oregon and Wisconsin), and Oregon probably would have been chosen despite having lost to LSU earlier in the year and Wisconsin would have been left out. That was a weird year.
I was counting Penn State, actually. Penn State, Arkansas, Auburn. Who was the 4th that finished the regular season with a winning record? They only played 3 other bowl teams, Florida, Vandy and Miss St., and all 3 finished 6-6. You're actually going to point to LL and Tulsa when Alabama played FCS Georgia Southern in the 2nd-to-last week of November? Oklahoma State beat 4 teams that were ranked at the time, while Alabama only beat 3.
So, I'm not "phrasing" anything beyond the facts.
We could go on and on and on about this, and if you stack up the resumes and block out the names, Alabama simply did not have as good of a season as Oklahoma State in all categories except for the ranking of the team that beat them...but that should have been negated by playing a tougher schedule. And if you're still going to point to the championship game result as an indication that Alabama deserved to be there, I am going to say that the result is an indication that LSU was not only beyond overrated, but that the SEC was a joke that year and that neither SEC team should have been there. They were beaten worse than Ohio State in 2006. I have no doubt that Oklahoma State would have annihilated LSU that night, and they definitely deserved their chance to be there.
Sorry, I just like arguing with Catch5.
It may very well be possible to have the 2 best teams in 1 division, but Alabama didn't prove that it was one of the 2 best teams that season. They only beat 3 bowl teams that had winning records. Oklahoma State beat 7. In the game Alabama lost, it didn't score a touchdown and missed 3 field goals.
That game will always be one of controversy. But I have yet to read an argument from anyone that would indicate why Alabama empirically deserved to be chosen for that championship game (the result of the game logically cannot be cited, since no one can predict the future). Usually the only reason is the quality of the loss, but as already indicated - Oklahoma State played a tougher top-to-bottom schedule that year.
I think the reason it's still legal because of 1-yard situations, in which it allows the ball carrier to go over the top.
That blows. I would think helmet design is the property of Riddell.
It's going to be a home crowd for the Buckeyes anyway, so...#homejerseys
But I still think these were amongst the best helmets in football last year: