It seems like the interception we had and the Hyde run that were both overturned didn't seem to be meet "indisputable video evidence." I'm not even saying it was wrong (or right) but it sure didn't seem indisputable by any means. What is that about? I thought they only had the angles we see and if that is the case I couldn't say either way on either of those plays.







There was also another play earlier in the game that was reviewed and overturned in Indiana's favor. I think all 3 calls were all pretty debatable either way and wouldn't have objected had they made the opposite call on the field. But for all three plays to be overturned was kind of ridiculous in my opinion.
I thought the possible pick was clearly an interception as you could see it skip across the turf
These replay refs were absolute garbage tonight. Didn't know you could come down with the ball out of bounds, throw the ball inbounds, and the play continues. Wow.
Class of 2010.
Did Indiana cover the spread? The conspiracy theorist in me is askin'.