Since football season has not started yet and there is not much on the recruiting front I thought I would pose this question. Should the NCAA investigate PSU due to the Sandusky case? My understanding is that the NCAA is looking at ethics violations along with lack of "Institutional control and oversight" violation(s) but I am curious about what others think about this situation (Other then Sandusky should rot in hell for eternity which I believe 99.9% of us would agree).







Can you imagine this being an OSU asst. coach in this situation? The NCAA would be having a press conference at 7 a.m. this morning announcing the massive investigation being launched saying the public could rest assured that the devil would pay for ALLOWING it to happen. Of course this is overblown but it almost has plausible truth to it. Most on the tube last night have spoken about the fact that PSU covering this up will be the next issue and the NCAA will and should address it in some way. Why shouldn't they be held accountable for LOI when the AD did not report it to be Humane to Sandusky? They didn't report it in order to protect the football program. And anyone that thinks these incidents didn't happen while he was coaching needs to rethink it. He didn't just flip a switch and start liking little boys after his coaching career ended. This was covered up for some time IMO.
I agree that Penn State needs to be investigated by the NCAA. It will be a hard case to try, the NCAA has never really had to deal with violations like this. I have a feeling a new chapter may be added to the NCAA rulebook as a result of the last year in Happy Valley.
"Attack the Strong, Trample the Weak, Hurdle the Dead!"
-Former OSU S&C Coach Lichter
I don'tk now what's going to happen, but I just don't like saying can you imagine if this were Ohio State and what would happen. The whole situation is sick and tragic, and I just don't like comparing everything that happens everywhere else to what happened here. What happened here is over and done, and it's time to move on.
Sandusky being convicted was the first domino to fall. Now the civil suits can start pouring in, and investigations into just how far Penn State went to cover this stuff up. In the middle of it all perhaps the NCAA does step in. In my opinion, though, this conviction was just the tip of the iceberg. Penn State has some really dark days coming.
Joe Amendola has got to be the worst defense lawyer ever. Listening to his speech last night you would have thought he was working for the prosecution.
Penn State SHOULD receive a very harsh punishment by the NCAA IMO. This has got to be the worst thing to happen within a program that I have ever heard. It is the NCAA though and even if they do something it may be 3 years down the road.
I really hope this now allows the victims to begin the healing process and they are able to get help and have a somewhat normal life knowing Sandusky will never again be able to do this to another child.
This is a case for the real governing body, not some arbitrary, inconsistent judicial branch of an organization tasked with policing college athletics. What happened at Penn St. requires real jail time for the person who comitted the crime, not a punishment for the student athletes and fans who had nothing to do with this crime.
I'm somewhat disgusted by your thirst to punish another school/fanbase in a harsh manor right after we got handed down a punishment that many of us feel didn't match the crime.
If they prove there was a cover up starting at the top down and people in the program knew about it and did nothing then yes, they should be punished to the fullest extent possible. If this makes me disgusting then so be it.
BUCKI5,
While I agree it should be decided by a governing body, it has been and the verdict has been handed down. I want to read your last phrase of your first paragraph, "not a punishment for the student athletes and fans who had nothing to do with this crime." Isn't that what happened at tOSU. Pryor & Co. are all gone so is Tress and yet we have NCAA sanctions. So it can be argued that while Tress covered up to protect the football team, the higher ups at Penn State did the same thing. If it were just Sandusky then I wouldn't say the team should be punished, but the fact that the AD and President allowed this to continue to protect the program is disgusting.
I was kind of thinking the same thing Chicago...If Sandusky was commiting a crime and the coach/a.d/prez knew about it isn't that failure to monitor their program?
This indeed is similar to OSU in the fact that it was "possibly", term used due to fact not yet proven, covered up for many years. Covered up by the AD to protect the program as opposed to covered up by a coach to protect players, what differs? If found that PSU had knowledge of this and indeed covered it up, LOI without question should be the charge to the highest punishment. Yes it is unfair to the current innocent involved but aren't all punishments handed down by the NCAA that way?
So, it's ok for fan bases and student athletes to be punished by an arbitrary, inconsistent judicial branch for bartering a couple tattoos and t-shirts but not "real crimes" that involve the destruction of children's lives and molestation...gotcha
What makes the NCAA arbitrary and inconsistent is if they look the other way and do nothing in regards to sanctions that should be levied against Penn State. Even the SMU train wreck pales in comparison to severity against humanity, thumbing your nose at the NCAA and continuing on with buusiness as usual does not equal looking the other way while young boys are being raped in your facilities showers.
The difference in this case is these are not athletic violations. This is a criminal case. There was no playing of ineligable players for an athletic advantage. They covered up a crime. The National Collegiate Athletic Association has almost no authority in this case because it is not about athletics. This is a criminal case. The violators are facing jail time and criminal prosecution. I guess the NCAA could give a show cause penalty again Sandusky but I think over 400 years of jail time will prevent him from ever coaching again so why waste their time. Same with anyone who covered this up. Administators have been fired and are facing ciminal prosecution. Do you really think another university will hire any of these people.
Any cover up of any crime to deflect negative publicity away from the athletic department (and in this case, football) needs to be addressed by the NCAA. It is well within their realm and bylaws to do so. My opinion has nothing to do with anything involving tOSU. It has to do with the NCAA effectively governing it's members.
It has frequently been said that the cover up is always worse than the crime - in this case I don't know if that is possible. However, surely if there had been no cover up and justice had been served earlier there would not have been so many victims. Anyone and any organization that had any part in this cover up need to be held accountable by any organization that governs them. The NCAA can not sit idly by and just ignore this situation. To do so would be a cover up of their own that they would have to deal with. And, we all know how devastating cover ups and/or organizational indifference to crimes of pedophilia can be - just look at the Catholic Church - one of the principles figures in that cover up just got convicted. And, that scandal has cost the church untold financial and follower losses. For all of the controversy they are actively involved in, it is their inaction on child sex abuse that has really hurt them.
The NCAA can choose to make a statement by sanctioning PSU - a statement that will undeniably reinforce their position of maintaining the well being of student athletes at any level. To do anything less will only reinforce the opinions of all the naysayers who believe the NCAA has very little interest in the student athlete.
How long will it be before any of us start petitioning tOSU to abandon the NCAA? We survived their handling of Tatgate, and although I did not like the results, I am not writing Gene and Gordon demanding they abandon the NCAA. The NCAA was well within their rights to handle the situation the way they did. However, should the NCAA not follow through with some type of action for this mess at PSU I will probably begin. I will continue to watch tOSU sports because that is one of my passions, but I will not watch any other NCAA matchups. There probably are not many out there like me, but how much more BS of inaction will be endured before others start to walk away from draw of NCAA sports?
PSU should be investigated by the federal government as well as the football program being investigated by the NCAA
No need to investigate PSU, they have had enough negative publicity in the past 8 months. Sandusky is guilty, JoPa died of a broken heart what else do you want??!?!?! Leave them alone and lets move on. And if you want more negative publicity to be thrown their way you are a weasel and a douche bag that used to tattle tale on everybody when you were a kid!!!!
You must look at the impact the institution would have felt had this man been properly handled, law enforcement investigating to the fullest, in the late 1990's. The football program as a whole would have been drug through the mud, so to speak, as their beloved assistant coach came up on these horrific charges soon after a national championship run causing possible irrepairable damage to public image. Instead the AD, and possibly the head coach chose to sweep it under the rug. It has to be an issue with the NCAA as it directly affected the football program standing. Understand that it is a criminal issue and persons involved in the crime have been or will be dealt with but they committed said crimes as leaders of and officials of the institution that gained advantage by covering up the crimes.
So the program should get off free because their dirtbag coaches got what they deserved? PSU has nothing to lose with the Sandusky conviction, it only confirms what everyone knew and doesn't change the standing of the University. The cover up does. It's akin to harboring a fugitive when you cover up disgusting things like Penn State has attempted to do, and they should be given the harshest penalty available.
Others have posted --I have no direct knowledge-- that the NCAA has cetain clauses on ethics that PSU might have violated. I expect to see the NCAA sit out the first few rounds here (Sandusky's criminal trial, subsequent civil litigations against Sandusky and posssibly PSU). After the victims' lawyers do all the heavy lifting, the NCAA will be able to see if there's anything that merits a LOIC charge and will then proceed accordingly.
Ok, So a few question for everyone. What type of punishment does Penn State deserve? In what sports? If you pick certain sports how did the actions or non-action of the administrators responsible give a competative advantage in that sport? Also how does the NCAA investigate something that happened almost 20 years ago? Do they bring in Mike McQuary since he appears to be the only living person who is still employed by an NCAA institution who can be compelled to give any testimony? Sorry this is a criminal case it is horrific but it is not a NCAA matter.
I don't think this is a NCAA issue, at least not one that should result in sanctions to the football program. I think this is more of a Penn State University problem, and they should be investigated by the proper authorities (not the NCAA I wouldn't think) and they have opened themselves to huge civil damages.
Buck I 8. I think you're wrong, PSU had everything to lose with the Sandusky decision. Did you read their statement last night? They have essentially been backed into a corner now that Sandusky has been proven to be a child molester and they now face substantial civil lawsuits with millions of dollars in penalties. Also, their endowment has dropped substantially and will continue to do so now that major donors and alum are turned off to the university.
They can't all go to jail, but they will pay
If covering up tattoos are an NCAA issue, than covering up child molesting sure as shit is.
@DMC Not exactly what I meant. If Sandusky gets far fewer charges, PSU is still on the hook, and there was basically no chance he could walk completely. Despite the inconsistencies in some of the testimony, he admitted to doing things that were inappropriate, and he can't back away from that. The civil suits would still happen, and they would still have to run these reparational programs.
But you an I are essentially making the same overall point. The University cover-up can't just be looked at as "they already got what they deserved, let's move on".
Rock, Free tattoos are an impremissable benefit for a student athlete and not a criminal offense. Child molestation is a criminal offense and its cover up will be handled in federal and civil court where the punishements will be much more severe. We are not talking bowl bans and loss of scolarships we are talking millions of dollars worth of civil suits and compensation for victim. Lets not trivialize it by comparing it to tatoos
@Pheonix, I agree with you, but by aforementioned NCAA bylaws, it should be handled internally, as a breach of ethics within an athletic department, and externally as a crime with relevance in criminal and civil courts. The NCAA exists to keep this kind of thing in check, and if the athletic side of the issue isn't held accountable, I don't think justice can be acheived.
No one is trivializing it Phoenix. In my understanding we, as an organization, weren't punished for the tattoos. The players were. The organization was punished for what was rightly or wrongly perceived as covering it up to protect the football team.
The PSU organization should be punished if it is found that they covered up this mess to protect the football team. And, this is entirely seperate from the criminal prosecution, which should also continue.
Sorry so long, but it seems to be relevant to the thread.
Last Updated - November 22, 2011 3:01 GMT
Contact | Archive | RSS
NCAA letter to Penn State
“Like everyone who has read the grand jury report, we are all deeply disturbed by the alleged sexual abuse of children as well as the alleged response by Penn State officials,” Dr. Mark Emmert said in regards to the ongoing investigation at PSU.
Emmert’s letter to PSU’s Erickson
Penn State has learned via letter from NCAA President Mark Emmert to university president Rodney Erickson that the governing body of collegiate sports will launch an investigation of the school’s athletic programs in the wake of allegations of sexual abuse by former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky and charges of perjury against to two senior university officials, former athletic director Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, the school’s former senior vice president for business and finance.
“I am writing to notify you that the NCAA will examine Penn State’s exercise of institutional control over its intercollegiate athletics programs, as well as the actions, and inactions, of relevant responsible personnel,” Emmert wrote. “We recognize that there are ongoing federal and state investigations and the NCAA does not intend to interfere with those probes.”
A statement from the NCAA said: “After careful analysis of the Association’s institutional control and ethics policies, Dr. Emmert has sent a letter to Penn State President Erickson stating this unprecedented situation demands the NCAA evaluate the university’s accountability with regard to those policies and directing specific questions to the university about its application of NCAA bylaws. While the criminal justice process clearly takes precedence over any NCAA actions, the Association is closely monitoring the situation.”
Emmert also spoke by phone with President Erickson, who pledged Penn State’s full cooperation with the NCAA review.
Emmert set out several questions that University officials must be prepared to answer as part of the probe. Responses to this NCAA inquiry are expected by Dec. 16 in order for the NCAA to determine next steps.
Sanctions will definitely be coming in the future...not a manner of if but when....due to LOI as well as major ethical violations...
http://www.statecollege.com/news/local-news/a-look-at-whats-next-in-penn...
I don't doubt that there will be sanctions... But loss of football scholarships? Death penalty? How? The person who failed in the eyes of the law are the President and the Athletic Director. There could be university athletic sanctions, including a deduction in all scholarships, but I don't think there can be any football-specific sanctions. I could be wrong, that's just my view of the situation
With all due respect, Sandusky "failed in the eyes of the law" by committing the crime that put us here. He was a football coach, these were football camps, and so any unethical actions taken by the department and the school are matters of ethics dealt with in the realm of Penn State football. Is it fair to the current players and coaches if there are football sanctions? No. But can it happen? Definitely
I have to confess that much of my interest in the case is based on the attitude of the PSU fanbase towards our fanbase. Specifically the PSU opinions that were on display during our NCAA violations last year. Penn State people spit out "liars and cheaters" and other Ohio State slurs more than any other Big Ten fanbase IMO. And last summer I remember many of us warned M1EK and the other PSU trolls that their program wasn't as clean as they presumed. How's that for foreshadowing?
Before anyone flames me -- I get that this is a petty reaction on my part. However, if I thought there was the least bit of self-reflection or contrition on their part -- I'd be ready to let this go. Do a search on "buckeye", "OSU", or "Ohio" on any BSD comment thread. ITO, we're still the dirtiest program in the NCAA and they are still the model for "doing things the right way". And it's just not one or two fringe commentors that feel this way. It's pretty much the consensus.
Much of their defiance originates from the cult-like devotion to Paterno by the PSU fanbase. Details of the cover-up are going to become public during the Curley & Schultz trials as well as during the victims' civil suits. Expect an indictment of Spanier to happen before the end of summer. Also expect that Paterno is going to be implicated in the cover-up. I wonder how this fanbase is going to react to the unravelling of the Paterno mythos.
One of my favorite 11W commentors posted last week that there was no cover-up. That we need to "take off [our] tin-foil hats". If that's the case then Stewart Mandell at SI needs to take off his hat as well.
#fistpumpgobuckeyes
No, Joe Pa died of late stage lung cancer. I'm not being insensitive, but this martyr status people give him is just not correct. I'm not going to go into what he knew or didn't know about Sandusky because that's irrelevant to why he died. The man was diagnosed with lung cancer. He was over 80 years old. That's a combination that will often times lead to the patient not surviving. Was he under stress from all the mess? Sure. Did it cause his cancer, absolutely not.
@ Lawdog
Absolutely they should be investigated. They have (and have had...for the better part of 10-15 years) blatant lack of institutional control to go hand-in-hand with the massive coverup that went all the way up to the Penn State executive level. If there was ever a case that should receive the death penalty, this is it. Their leaders chose to value football & money over some innocents kids who were being molested continually by one of their employees and then even after he stopped being an employee, he continued to have access to the university and shower room to continue his deeds.
Some of the posts here I think are somewhat silly though in that they say it's not fair to punish the fans & other athletes who had nothing to do with any of the "violations"...well no crap....but that's kinda the way it works. What did John Simon, Zach Boren and others do to deserve a bowl ban in 2012? The answer? F*ckin nothin. And here we are.
Penn State football should be shut down IMO until that dump is cleaned out with a fire hose and gotten back on track with what a school is supposed to be and stand for. Just my opinion.
NCAA definitely needs to sanction Penn State in some form for this whole cover-up of Sandusky's horrible crimes. I normally try to understand the side of the argument I don't agree with, but in this case, I can't. In a perfect world, no, the players and fans would not have to suffer from the actions of Sandusky and high-up administrators. But that's not how punishments with the NCAA work. Even though there's no comparison whatsoever between what happened at Penn State, and what happened here with tattoos and benefits and such, there is one basic common reason for why the higher-ups at Penn State covered for Sandusky and why Tressel covered for his players - to protect the brand and on-field success of the program. That's what Tressel was accused of doing, and that's what Ohio State was punished for. Penn State should be punished as well for covering it up and the severity of the crimes that were covered up. It sucks for their fans to have that happen after everything else with Sandusky. But it also sucks that those Penn State administrators covered for Sandusky. It sucks for us that we can't go to a bowl game. It sucks to hear people call us cheaters. It sucks that some of our players broke the rules and that Tressel kept his mouth shut. It's just how it is, though. There are parts of life that suck.
Class of 2010.
Well put and I agree with you. A cover up is a cover up....doesn't matter if it tattoos, Sandusky, or Brady Hoke robbing girl scouts to steal all their cookies (I forgot to put ALLEGEDLY before that last one). IMO the death penalty is not needed especially since most of those that were involved are no longer part of the PSU program but I think a precedent needs to be set so that nothing like this will happen again. Each time the NCAA drops the hammer on a program there are many people affected that had nothing to do with the sanctions but that is the nature of the NCAA beast.
Also, I appreciate all the different viewpoints today...thanks to all!
I don't see how this is the perfect case for a death penalty.. Every single violation from other universities mentioned here was based off of football and was sanctions because of conduct by football players/coaches/boosters and others with official affiliation with football programs. Tattoos, Tressel, Shapiro, UNC, etc were all sanctions for football violations.
Obviously Sandusky was with the team, but when this came up (2001) Sandusky was retired and was authorized to use facilities by the PSU athletic department, not just the football team. The members of the football program followed their legal obligation by reporting the abuse up the chain. The failure was by the AD and the President. Again, not football officials.
This will stick the university or the athletic department with penalties (and, again, more civil damages than you can count), but I don't see any chance for football-specific penalties. You just can't compare this situation to tattoos. It was a coverup sure, but the OSU cover up was by the head coach, not here.
DMC,
Yes he was not the head football coach, but my answer to football specific penalties is Noah Spence. If it was in 2001, and players decommit because of things that happened to the football team over a decade ago then why decommit. It can easily be argued that closer to when it was occurring they would have lost more recruits. These recruits probably altered their future of the Penn State program. While he was only an assistant, he was associated with the program and would have hurt the program if this was released.
We don't know that yet. Given Paterno's level of authority in State College, I'm thinking he was complicit in the cover-up probably starting after the original investigation and Sandusky's "retirement" in 1998.
#fistpumpgobuckeyes
@ DMCDOUGAL
Ours was by Tressel for Tats, not child molestations spanning over a decade. Theirs involved the head football coach's knowledge, multiple other football coach's knowledge as well as multiple executives at the school who even had a file for Sandusky. This was absolutely a football-related coverup to not embarrass their school and to keep the $$ flowing in.
Penn State is the definition of dirty program.
Here's a link to a 2008 Outside the Lines video about how Penn State was protecting it's football program - http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=7229980
A lot of similarities of covering up events that are big deals and allowing individuals access to the team when they should no longer be allowed.
Joe Paterno is not a saint like Penn State fans make him out to be. He is no better than Jim Tressel who was protecting him players, he is actually very scumbagish in not taking care of the Sandusky issue himself. The more I think about it, the more I think Joe Paterno knew what was going on with Sandusky.
Penn State fans can think whatever they want but they're just denying the truth that everything that they think their program stands for is a lie.
DMC is like an ostrich with it's head in the sand. I can understand his admiration for JoPa because of the longevity and overall record. However, to give him a pass on this whole ordeal because of that is just plain wrong. JoPa said it best himself - "I wish I had done more." However you want to interpret that, his inaction on this was a major part of why this continued for so long at PSU. And his handling of this is eerily similar to the way he handled legal run ins for his players as described by a past Senior Vice President of Student Affairs at PSU. Make no mistake about it, JoPa had it within his power to end this whole matter much earlier. It may be debatable as to how much he actually knew about Sandusky, but he knew enough to inform him that he would never be the HC at PSU and force his early retirement. And, this cover up was done to protect the football team. If Sandusky had been a coach in any other sport or employed in any other PSU dept he would have faced the music much earlier. For anyone to say this had nothing to do with PSU football is terribly naive and wrong.
There is no way to compare this to what happened at OSU because the nature of what was being covered up was so drastically different. However the real reason OSU got hammered was not because of the nature of the violation, but because of the inaction of one person - Jim Tressel. You may be able to interpret JT's emails differently, but the bottom line is that he knew something was not right and he had a responsibility to find out what was really happening and report it. His inaction was interpreted to be an action to protect the football team. PSU administrators, including JoPa, had that same responsibility. It is in the eyes of the NCAA where the cover up to protect the image of the team is worse than the crime. These were very deliberate inactions by multiple individuals at PSU. The depth of this cover up is so much deeper than many examples of other University athletic scandals that netted very severe sanctions.
? This has nothing to do with Joe Paterno, it has to do with who all of this comes down on. As of right now it is Curley and Schultz.
Razrback, it was a coverup to protect the school.. That's the same thing I'm saying. That's why I'm saying this doesn't hit the football team only.
and finally, I'm not trying to compare the cover-ups, I'm trying to compare who perpetrated the cover-ups. Therein lies the difference and why PSU football team won't be hit with bowl bans
This has a lot to do with Paterno. Of course he wasn't the highest man on the totem-pole, but Paterno still played a significant role in all of this.
"Attack the Strong, Trample the Weak, Hurdle the Dead!"
-Former OSU S&C Coach Lichter
@Buck-I.8
PSU has nothing to lose with the Sandusky conviction.
I believe with confidence you are wrong on that statement. A assistant football coach being convicted of child molestation is a huge blow to the university and has everything to lose. If Sandusky was not convicted there would be absolutley no issues surrounding PSU and their athletic department. Your statement is way off the target and erroneous.
First, do some reading underneath that comment, it was clarified. Second, the lack of accountability was shown either way, and would still be under investigation.
I've seen many PA/Penn St ppl try to say there shouldn't be an investigation into what happened over a 10 year period due to all the people being dismissed that were involved (& unfortunately Jo Pa as well). IMO of course they should be investigated and sanctions galore. However, with some of the Board at Penn St as well as most Admin involved being dismissed...I see NOTHING happening to them. I wouldn't get my hopes up for a nice one or two year bowl ban like OSU and others have gotten for WAY less on all accounts...but it's just not going to happen (as much as we all want it to...it just won't happen). Penn State will always have this looming over their heads and I wouldn't be surprised if Meyer and OSU grab a couple recruits like last year. This will continue to be a black eye on the university and there will be some uncertainty with what "may" happen (I'm sure NCAA will say they'll investigate...doing something is another matter. Anyone see if Miami Fl got any sanctions?? (bc they won't and neither will PSU).
"There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you."
"I love football. I think it is most wonderful game in world and I despise to lose."
Woody Hayes 1913 - 1987
I've been perusing the BSD commentary looking for something specific and I think I found it last night. It's the BSD equivalent of the moment when Brutus warned the 11W commentariat that something was going on with Tressel needing a lawyer in regards to the Tat-5 violations.
Two BSD commentors conducted an exchange where each confirmed from separate sources that the Freeh Report is going to implicate between 10 and 20 people.
One of them wrote the following: "So much sinister at play [that] PSU alumni/supporters will be in disbelief." And from the other: "From my sources... If it indeed plays out, it will be a 'Community' affair."
PLUS one of these guys is known to be close to the Paterno family.
So the 11W commentors above who are in denial re Paterno's involvement -- I think in the next six months the veil is going to be lifted as far as Paterno's guilt in the cover-up.
[Edit: So you know I didn't just make this up -- the two commentors are SweepTheLeg & DerryPharmer. Here's the thread to which I'm referring. DerryPharmer is the guy with supposedly some sort of linkage to the Paternos. My use of the term "close to the family" needed to be corrected -- was a big assumption on my part.]
#fistpumpgobuckeyes
First off your wrong agian Buck-I.8. Second off you did not clarify anything, you were just stating that the courts concluded with what we already know. Your opinions are now taken with a grain of salt and have taken a substantial hit in the credibility column.
But..but..but... Oh wait, I don't care. Your opinion doesn't mean shit to me, and your statements about my credibility are pretty hilarious after you create threads with double-digit mispelled words about how Urban isn't doing a good enough job recruiting, or some similar nonsense, and then you brag about your "degree" after backtracking and claiming you were drunk. Genius.
Btw, it's you're*
Thanks for sharing that NC_Buckeye. If more information comes out then my view will change, but right now there isn't enough against Paterno and the football team specifically to say that they lacked institutional control. They certainly seem to have sufficient evidence to hit the Athletic Department as a whole though. If those BSD sources are accurate, this has only just begun.
Why would we want PSU's football program to get punished? They've already lost a lot, and an NCAA sanction would not help matters. It deters nothing and had nothing to do with football. This would just destroy an already shaky situation and hurt a program we need in our conference to keep it strong. A stronger PSU football team is good for us. Do we want them punished just because we were?
The football program should be punished because they allowed a pedophile to use their facilities fully knowing he was pedophile monster.
tOSUman,
I hear what you're saying but, I think many are hoping for sanctions so that Urban can continue to raid East Coast talent that we would normally have to battle Penn State for. So yes, its bad for the conference but OSU would likely be one of the biggest beneficiaries.
"Because the rules won't let you go for three." - Woody Hayes
THE Ohio State University
That said ^^^^^^^ and PSU picks up a 5 * lineman that we wanted. Crazy.
I for one do not want to see PSU get punished to reap some benefits of recruiting as you say. If they are found guilty of a cover up, I want them punished because they deserve to be punished. I would much rather this whole sick thing never happened at all but it did and has to be dealt with.
^^^^^^^^^^^^ This. Plus I'd like to see PSU fans get off of their high horse.
#fistpumpgobuckeyes
Saw this article from March2011 before shit really hit the fan...
http://www.pennlive.com/midstate/index.ssf/2011/03/jerry_sandusky_former...
Didnt JoePa sell his assets to his wife only last summer?
what is really sickening is the comments of some of these people in March of 2011...
So why should the PSU football team pay the price for school admin guys inaction??? Should the tennis team get punished too?? What about baseball?
B/c of Joe Pa didn't do enough? Why is that an NCAA violation?? This makes no sense to me. I have no idea why the NCAA would sanction legal issues? This would open the doors to many many isssues the NCAA wants nothing to do with. LOIC deals with "on the field issues", not this stuff.
Looks like somebody's buttons got pushed. Looks like somebody's toes got stepped on. Its sad when a buckeye fan loses their head resulting in a irrational outburst. Just calm down and take a deep breathe I promise everything will be ok, well in your case the odds are agianst you. Good luck.
If a "cover-up" is proven then they should surely be punished. If they would of brought this situation to light when it occuered it surely would have damaged the football team. (loss of coach, loss of recruits, current players leaving) so by covering it up, it seems to me they were protecting their football team and they benefited from it...
If there was a cover-up goodbye PSU hello Pitt. Probably wouldn't happen but I'd like to see it in that case.
Tankman
Tankman - because they were covering up to protect the football team. The actions happened at the football facilities, he was a former football coach, allowed access to the football facilities even after Sandusky was reported...
This is why the football program needs punished.
If the Penn State Officials covered this up to help the football program, there should be punishment levied to the football program. If they didn't then it should just be a gov't issue with the school.
When does the SI issue with George Dohrmann's expose' on Penn State hit the shelves?
i don't know why anyone is allowing "Remington2323" any time of day. This troll is the definition of a troll.
Nobody respond to him. just in case anyone needs to go back:
"No need to investigate PSU, they have had enough negative publicity in the past 8 months. Sandusky is guilty, JoPa died of a broken heart what else do you want??!?!?! Leave them alone and lets move on. And if you want more negative publicity to be thrown their way you are a weasel and a douche bag that used to tattle tale on everybody when you were a kid!!!!"
"Looks like somebody's buttons got pushed. Looks like somebody's toes got stepped on. Its sad when a buckeye fan loses their head resulting in a irrational outburst. Just calm down and take a deep breathe I promise everything will be ok, well in your case the odds are agianst you. Good luck."
"Winter is coming" - Urban Meyer
Go back even further. Hasn't even been on the site for like 2 months, and it's been trolling since day 1. My fault on this one I guess, I poked the toddler.
That ticking you hear is the bomb below State College that is the Frehe Report. The time will come for the rest of Penn State to face the music and everyone else who said "Well we don't really know enough" will be firmly, angrily, and poeticly silenced.
4-6 seconds from point A to point B and when you get to point B, be pissed off
As much as I'd like to think you're right Brew...I'd doubt it happens. More money involved here than you think and the expendable ones have been executed. I may be wrong but I seriously think Penn St. will dodge all NCAA violations due to terminating all involved...even the witness to it all. Hope I'm wrong...but doubt I am. 10 years + of child abuse=Nadda from the NCAA...but a cover up of trinkets for tattoos is at least a bowl ban as well as self imposed sanctions...not to mention Head Coach gets
firedresigns. So a deaf, blind, and dumb monkey can see this is horse shit delivered in a hand basket...but the NCAA wanted OSU since back in Woody's days to Earle's to Coop's and, to unfortunately Tress's. It sucks but oh well...moving on."There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you."
"I love football. I think it is most wonderful game in world and I despise to lose."
Woody Hayes 1913 - 1987
@ Buckeye76
No question about it. If Penn State's name was Ohio State instead they'd have a full investigation crew in town setting up camp for the long haul with ESPiN right next to 'em with a 24/7 camera rolling.
@BB919, I feel the same way about @tankman. The stuff he's been writing about Tressel plus this defense of Paterno -- he's got to be an undercover PSU fan. Go ahead and come clean @tankman. What's your username on BSD?
#fistpumpgobuckeyes
Hey @Brewster, you spelled it wrong a couple times now so I thought I'd give you the lowdown.
It's being called the Freeh Report because the man the PSU BOT hired to conduct the investigation is Louis Freeh who was the director of the FBI from 1993-2001. From then until this assignment, Freeh has been acting as an attorney and private sector consultant.
#fistpumpgobuckeyes
CNN released some emails today between the top guys at PSU. It isn't good. Looks like Paterno may have been more involved as well. I can't link it, but you should be able to find it quickly via google or CNN
Here is link to the story about the released emails:
http://www.cnn.com/video/standard.html#/video/bestoftv/2012/06/30/ac-sanduskycandiotti.cnn?iref=allsearch
Sick stuff. Hope these guys follow Sandusky into prison...and hopefully some prison justice is handed down to all involved.
NC, thank you. There aren't many things I hate more than getting an easily correctable mistake wrong multiple times. Shame on me. (that actually wasn't sarcasm, btw).
I wonder how soon before people actually admit "Ok now we know enough to pass judgment". The ugly part of this PSU scandal didn't end with Sandusky. Time to watch some reputations crash and burn. I hope PSU gets the knock against it deserves-as an institution that actively and systematically covered up child rape to protect its brand of football.
I hope Joe Pa's rep is the first one burned. I was accused earlier this year of being bent on vilifying Joe....its because he was a villain.
4-6 seconds from point A to point B and when you get to point B, be pissed off
Nope, the people defending Paterno are gonna hide now, and hope they can just be forgotten for being apologists without having a clue of any details. It doesn't get a whole lot more damning than these emails.
Buck, I'm going to call their shots now. Who ever stands up for Paterno will still feign ignorance. Anyone that is Pro Joe will stick to blaming Curley, Schultz, and Spanier but try their damndest to give Joe a pass by saying he wasn't privy to these emails. I will stand by my point that anyone who knew anything shouldn't have allowed Jerry unfettered access to PSU facilities for almost 10 years without saying something. Screw Curley, Spanier, Schultz, McQueery, and most of all Paterno.
This makes me sick to my stomach. The 4 most powerful guys at PSU (and the most powerful guy in the state) all could have told Jerry to get the hell away from Penn State and stay there. Instead, what did they do? well...
To hell with Penn State. Every part of it.
4-6 seconds from point A to point B and when you get to point B, be pissed off
If true and i believe it to be, Joe Paterno was a scumbag. Dirty scumbag.
I can't speak for other Joe "apologists" but this was all I was waiting for...concrete proof rather than assumptions. Sure, many of you ended up being correct, and I have no problem admitting that...I just disagreed with how many came to that conclusion before seeing the actual proof. I felt he at least deserved to have the proof made public before tarnishing his name. That being said, I will no longer "defend" Joe...now that the proof is out there he deserves all criticism thrown his way.
Same here. I'm not hiding, I'm the one that brought back this thread... I wanted more evidence tying in Paterno before I put him in the same category as Curley and Schultz, now it looks like I've got it.
There was evidence out there before. The most damning was the information Vickey Triponey has given multiple news outlets. She was the past VP of Student Affairs who was forced out by JoPa and his minions. Here is one report:
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/football/bigten/story/2011-11-22/...
What is being revealed in these emails is exactly how she described JoPa operated. He never wrote anything down - he did not use emails or memos. He basically showed up and discussed things in person. The only information that we will get on his involvement is the few emails turned up by this investigation that reference such instances.
According to Vickey this type of action on Jo's part was commonplace when it came to dealing with anything connected to football. Her attempts to hold football players accountable for their discretions like any other student for similar acts were thwarted by Jo. Spanner even told her that she was one of the few who had seen the "darker side" of JoPa. In the end her persuit of holding football players accountable for their actions like any other student is why she was forced out of her position at PSU. And, make no mistake about it, the most powerful man at PSU was behind the move to get her ousted.
A cover up of this magnitude does not just happen on a whim. It was the result of years of the type of behavior reported by Vickey Triponey. This is why I have stated in previous posts that the NCAA should get involved at least in an investigation. Vickey's revelations show that there was preferential treatment for football players. And, now we know that the special treatment reached far beyond just protecting a player for the minor indiscretions that cropped up from time to time. It was a pattern of acts to protect the brand of PSU football. If that is not LOIC, I don't know what is.
To your point about Vickey Triponey, I linked to a video on page 1 from Outside the Lines that aired in 2008. The stuff Triponey said - like JoePa told his players not to talk to Student Affairs.... and JoePa denied it. I think JoePa is a damn liar. Watch that video and it'll make you feel sick.
What was Joe's slogan..... "Success with honor"? What a freaking hypocrite.
The more and more I think about this, the more and more JoePa becomes a shadier individual.
And what nuts is that all the a-holes at BSD think the media is trying to make this into something it wasn't. Wonder how they would feel if it were someone they knew that got abused... Blind faith is such a bad thing.
PSU defenders (not the ones Meyer will spend the better part of the next decade torching) will say this isn't a football issue, its a children issue. First, let me say that is a cheap, emotional ploy akin to the race card. Of course, saying this isn't about the kids sounds awful and no one here or anywhere would say that. This is still a Penn State football issue for a few reasons. First-obviously these crimes were committed by the second most important member of the Penn State Program during their glory days in the 80's and 90's. This wasn't a grad assistant, a booster or anything like that. It was Joe Pa's probably successor who did this. More damning, however, is what this cover up was intended to protect-Penn State football. The Brand was put above everything else. The acts themselves were criminal, everything else was done to preserve the reputed 'sterling' image of Penn State Football. Sadly, Penn State fans have their heads so far in the sand that NOTHING will change their minds about St. Joe-and that's fine. Let the delusional have their delusions.
4-6 seconds from point A to point B and when you get to point B, be pissed off
I'm waiting for the day when the ncaa and state leaders start calling for term limits for college coaches. Mark this down and remember this post. The argument will be that long term successful coaches obtain too much power and term limits will fix the problem. All arguments will be centered around the same arguments used to lmit terms for politicians.
I am not saying that I would support limits, bit be ready to hear the drumbeats.
Sorry on advance for typos...on my droid.
Term limits? Its a SPORT.
Explain to me how it was a violation for JT to cover up kids selling their own property but it's not a violation for Joe Pa to cover up the systematic rape of children in University facilities? Of coarse PSU deserves to be sanctioned. Their football coach was molesting children and was using the football program as his way to attract more victims. How do people not see that the football program is ultimately responsible for it's players and coaches. I'm sorry, the football program should be dealt with as harshly as possible. The lives of many people have been destroyed because of Jerry Sandusky and the PSU football program.
A little nonsense now and then is relished by the wisest men
I'd love to hear more about your term limit idea, but I don't think it's feasible. The states can't regulate private schools, so the only way it could happen uniformly is if Congress made it conditional upon universities taking their federal funding.
I don't really think term limits are a good idea. With power comes corruption, but the problem isn't that they are remaining in power too long. I don't think Tressel's violations had anything to do with him being the coach for 10 years, it had to do with the pressures of winning and fielding the best team you can. Tress covered it up because he wanted Pryor, Herron, Posey, etc. to be eligible.
This Penn State situation is so much more than football. I hope people understand that.
I've been saying this for months...Joe knew. The football program knew. The AD knew. The president knew. They allllll knew. Since the late 90s.
But around here, (western/central PA) --- everybody also knew that this was Joe's untouchable little feifdom.
Joe was the king. He was bigger than the president of the university, the AD, etc.;
Joe WANTED this story covered up -- so everybody complied upon Joe's requests.
"You win with people." - Woody Hayes
I also find a couple other things strange with the timing. Joe signed everything over to Sue last Summer. I know he had health problems that weren't public yet, but I think he knew this was eventually going to come out. Also, I find it interesting that after Joe's 409th record-setting win, (which Sandusky was in a press box for, btw!), just 2 days after...this whole thing just happens to break publically. Hmmm interesting timing. It's as if the media waited for Joe to get his big win, then break the story.
"You win with people." - Woody Hayes
You had me until your last sentence.
In my mind the way Paterno and PSU just "removed" Sandusky from his coaching duties saying he would not be head coach. What? An ultra successful National Championship winning D-coordinator, in his fifties, let go just like that? With no one pursuing him to coach elsewhere? Says the word was out on him most likely from Paterno himself. Interested parties called Paterno inquiring about him and they were told to steer clear. PSU NEEDED him to be gone from coaching. If he did go elsewhere and the brass did the right thing after he molested on other campuses, it would come back to PSU for the world to see what he was doing at PSU implicating Paterno and the group. His complete disappearance from coaching football during what would be the height of anyone elses career is otherwise hard to explain away.
yes, FortMeyer --- Sandusky's "retirement", at the pinnacle of his career - was strange timing indeed.
Jerry Sandusky was recruiting a Linebacker in South Carolina in the Summer of 2011.
Jerry Sandusky was seen using the workout facilities at Penn State in the Fall of 2011.
Jerry Sandusky was in a press box for Joe's 409th win in November of 2011!
You don't just walk in to a press box withouth the proper clearance/authority. And this is just the stuff that's been found out...I'm sure there's a lot more to it than these examples. Just disgusting --- because it's all lin the name of image & legacy. Covering up rape for their precious football program.
"You win with people." - Woody Hayes
@DMCDOUGAL24
I'm not saying I think term limits for coaches is feasible, will happen or is a good idea. I was just saying that we should be prepared to start hearing drumbeats from the media, government leaders, and other people who think terms limits for coaches is a good idea.
I can hear them now. "Long term successful coaches have too much power and control, especially for a sport which is not the core mission of a university." "This is why x,y and z happened." "Look at Papa Joe or Jim Tressel....way too much potential to hide shady actitivity." They will point to the PSU situation as evidence A and other past scandals both major and minor (SMU, USC, OSU, etc...) to support their case.
I could go on and on, but I am merely saying that we should not be shocked when drumbeats start to sound.
Thought provoking article from BBC. So much involved in this investigation it is a lot to comprehend as to what it could entail. Interesting to say the least.
http://www.thebuckeyebattlecry.com/2012/06/why-penn-state-matters/
tOSUman on 24 June 2012 - 7:24pm #Why would we want PSU's football program to get punished? They've already lost a lot, and an NCAA sanction would not help matters. It deters nothing and had nothing to do with football. This would just destroy an already shaky situation and hurt a program we need in our conference to keep it strong. A stronger PSU football team is good for us. Do we want them punished just because we were?
****
@ "tOSUman"
because they covered up multiple child rapes. try to think of something worse than that.
it's not about wanting them to be punished -- it's the least they deserve. who cares about destroying a shaky situation and hurt program. care more about the victims. make a statement for the victims by burying this program for 5 years. "they lost a lot" ? - they didn't lose enough, in my opinion. you have many kids who've lost their innocence & had their lives ruined. wow, man...priorities...there's more important things in life than a football program or football conference.
"You win with people." - Woody Hayes
I saw in my local paper today that that creep Sandusky is still getting a $58,000/yr. pension from PSU, via tax dollars.
"You win with people." - Woody Hayes
Penn State officials have decided to turn the Joe Paterno statue 180 degrees so it will be looking the other way.
Too soon? LOL
not sure if you found that or it was of your own doing but i lol'd a little bit
Not to rain on your parade, but that joke was used by another user in a different PSU thread a few days ago
Sorry Urban, Woody is still my favorite
how's that?
haha - it was me who used that joke...it's good enough to use twice, though. I didn't think of it either.
"You win with people." - Woody Hayes
I heard a funny Sandusky joke the other day - "Sandusky turned my tight end into a wide receiver". HA
the jokes are tasteless
Removed. Didn't intend it to sound like I was trying to poke fun of the situation, but that's how it came out and I'm willing admit I probably shouldn't have posted it. My bad fellow buckeyes. I apologize
Sorry Urban, Woody is still my favorite
This isn't edgy or clever or anything of the such. Some things are above being funny. Systematic Child Rape and its cover up by the most powerful men in the state is one of them. Before you respond with "Oh chill its a joke" you're the joke if your making it.
Disgusting.
4-6 seconds from point A to point B and when you get to point B, be pissed off
Please delete those "jokes" They are repulsive
Look, I'm usually pretty open about jokes that skirt or cross the line. BUT jokes about child molestation and rape are WAY accross the line. Please review this
http://www.elevenwarriors.com/help/commenting-policy
Abusive or hateful comments related to race, gender, sexual orientation, or religious beliefs.
Ad-hominem attacks on another site member
Extremely profane material or disgusting images
"If you knew anything about football..." or "It's obvious you never played the game..."
"FIRST!"
I propose the banhammer be initiated if these jokes continue or ANY other user starts joking about this. It's just not a line you cross . . . show a little respect for the victims in this case.
First! Ahh dammit...
As funny as some jokes can be...nothing is funny about what happened at Penn State (or elsewhere concerning child molestation).
"There's nothing that cleanses your soul like getting the hell kicked out of you."
"I love football. I think it is most wonderful game in world and I despise to lose."
Woody Hayes 1913 - 1987