Per 247 USC site: Smith's top 3: Notre Dame, Ohio State, and USC. Wants to visit SC this summer, and is suposed to visited Ohio State at the end of this month, then Notre Dame on June 14h. Potentially good news for the Buckeyes because they'll have atleast until August to make a push.







I think its between ND and OSU, if Pete Carroll were still coach then I could see it happening. Idt his family would want one Smiff in Ohio and the other Smiff in Cali. Just my opinion. Dream scenario we get Anzalone back, Jaylon and Vonn Bell. Then use the rest on O-lineman and Quick/Foster/Gibson.
During the Basketball season at Bishop Luers High school, Jaylin was wearing a ton of ND merchandise before and after games and at practice, His family wore OSU attire. Not reading to much into it but it seems there is a battle at home to win 1st.
@GHALE: definitely not out of the question, I can't imagine a parent liking Kelly.
im surprised so many kids do. I know i wouldnt want to be immasculated on the sidelines (leave that to the gf at home) lol
mark may wins douchebag of the year... again
Living near Cincinnati I remember Kelly throwing fits on the sidelines. Dude is a football coach with a bad temper, it happens. The players liked Kelly at UC, and the TV and Radio folks liked him a lot. I see guys purple faced and screaming at players on sidelines a lot in many sports. Sometimes assistants have guys by the jersey ripping them a new one.
If guys with purple faces and guys who ripped kids a new one weren't capable of recruiting Tom Izzo and Rick Pitino would never have won anything in college basketball. So, just because he screams at the kids I don't think it means the kids wouldn't want to play with him. I've played for coaches who yelled and cussed at us before that were pretty good guys. I've played for coaches who did the same and were assholes.
As a parent though, no way I'd want me kid to play for Kelly. A student died on his watch. It may or may not be fair to hold that over his head for the rest of his career, but A KID DIED ON HIS WATCH. It wasn't a football accident either. It was a totally avoidable, but he put the kid in danger anyway. If he weren't so new and the next savior of the program, there's no way he still has a job. If Brian Kelly made that mistake this year instead of when he did, he has no job.
The difference is that Kelly doesn't accomplish much. Izzo, Pitino, etc. can yell and scream when they've won national titles and placed a ton of kids in the pros.
Albert: it's the total ND/Kelly package, or lack thereof. The irate sideline antics, the kid dying on his watch, the fact that ND is no longer a major program and is not producing NFL players like it once did.
As for the last point, Kelly cannot be blamed much - yet, but it goes toward the question . . . Why in f--- would any 4/5 star kid (and/or his parents) be looking seriously at ND? That I'm so baffled by Kelly's recent recruiting successes must say something in his favor, but I still think he's a lowlife.
Whole lot of cluelessness on here.
Eerily similar to Ty Issac, where Michigan = ND, ND = OSU, and USC comes in late. No offense, but I'm rooting for the underdog so we don't have to play him.
Those who stay will be CHAMPIONS!
~Bo Schembechler
Clashmore_Mike is acting like a ND troll. Unlike thoughtful, good-sported "enemy" commenters like M Man, Rational, etc.,from what I can tell, Clashmore has offered nothing of substance. He only fires off sour little one-liners whenever his sainted Irish are butt-hurted.
Actually, I'd appreciate any meaningful contribution he might make to the commentariat, from the ND perspective, if he's capable of it.
Hmmm, could Clashmore Mike (ironic handle btw) be an undercover domer???
"You're pissed because we went after a committed guy? Guess what, we got 9 guys who better go do it again," said Meyer. "Do it a little harder next time."
@Hail,
USC is always a player when it comes to recruiting. Donald Duck could be the head coach and still bring in 5* recruits, and Lane Kiffin is, imo, a good cut above the quacking one . I hold my breath any time a prospect heads out there.
Fido, what comment from the ND perspective would you like? There is no point in offering anything meaningful regarding what is said about Kelly/ND in this thread because nothing is going to change people's posting habits. Its the same general "OMG Kelly yells at players" or "he killed someone" that is spewed all over the internet. Its difficult to add anything to those discussions because it isn't really worth the effort.
I'd be fine with discussing ND/OSU topics if others on here could be rational about it. I usually just come here to get an OSU perspective on things that have some connection to Notre Dame, mainly recruiting. Pretty much everything devolves into mindless bashing. So again, what kind of discussion would you like?
I find this ironic since ND and OSU haven't met on the field in what, 40-50 years?
Those who stay will be CHAMPIONS!
~Bo Schembechler
2006 Fiesta Bowl, Hail.
Fan of bacon since 1981
Hail, '94-'95 they had a series.
For UM grads, 40-50 = 6
Clashmore, when you come here and post about all of our "cluelessness", it doesn't really foster the type of discussion you say you are looking for in your second post. Just sayin'.
You can kill a fly with your slipper or a cannon. Either way, the fly dies. -Ramzy
@Clashmore_Mike I agree that many in the Ohio State fanbase have skewed opinions regarding Notre Dame's appeal and potential, but coming here and calling people clueless doesn't help elevate the discourse. If a large segment of Buckeye fans on 11W can learn to appreciate the input of the Michigan fans on the site, I'm sure your Notre Dame perspective would also be welcomed.
Class of 2008
Yeah I understand that. The word seemed apporpriate after reading Kelly is a lowlife and people can't believe that recruits would want to play for him/ND. I have no problem with OSU football and I'm not here as an undercover troll or whatever, clashmore mike doesn't exactly hide that I'm an ND fan. I'll try my best to give an accurate ND perspective.
@Clashmore:
People knock ND because there isn't a lot to praise ND for at this point. Not trying to troll them, it's just the truth. You guys have recruited as well as anyone and still fall short. Academically ND is a good school still so when kids go there for that reason I can't blame them. But the football program has had mediocre coaches who leave a lot to be desired in the personality department and fails on the football field year after year. Couple that with the fact that some ND fans act as if their team is God's gift and you get opposing fans who mock your team and fanbase.
Also, ND is starting to live up to it's reputation as the school that 4/5 stars go to die.
ha, ok.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4J1zIWlA14
EDDIE, EDDIE!!
Clashmore - I have several ND fans who are of friends of mine, and some of them are already over Brian Kelly and some are on the fence and willing to wait till he's got his guys completely in place till they pass judgment on him as a coach there. Be honest, do you think Brian Kelly is the right guy for ND and that he can bring ND back to the 'glory days' and make them relevant again? Cause I'll be honest, I have my doubts, but I wanna hear what you as an ND fan really think.
Clashmore: we say a lot worse things about Michigan here, compared to calling Kelly a lowlife, yet our Michigan guests "block it out" while often making insightful comments.
I've never visited ND's fan blog site(s). I bet Buckeyes are made to feel quite welcome there, right?
Anyway, it's good that you've expounded on your views. Now that you've quadrupled your previous output, in this one thread, though, I noticed that you still haven't said anything positive about ND, or analytical in nature. Instead, your expanded repertoire is still directed at us - the irrational, clueless, worthless, and mindless 11W community.
Yet, you've taken the effort to partake in those discussions a dozen or so times the past couple months, albeit mostly inserting one-liners. Why were those defensive one-liners worth the effort, but making a substantive comment would not have been?
For example, what is your argument for why we should not regard Kelly as a lowlife for the student dying on his watch? Was it not his fault?
TENN- there are ND fans on both extremes regarding Kelly. Some think he needs to win a BCS game this year or he's done, some think he is the greatest coach in history. I think I, and most rational fans (at least I hope I'm rational) are somewhere in between. He's the best fit as ND's head coach since Holtz (not saying a whole lot) because he understands what needs to happen to be successful and has a plan as well as a pretty solid track record. A lot of changes needed made at the ground level of the program and the biggest thing was changing the mindset of the team. I'm sure everyone remembers his comments last year that ruffled some of the upperclassmen's feathers. That is exactly the thing that needed corrected. I don't know if he is the guy to get ND back "to glory", but whenever he leaves, the program will be in much better shape than when he arrived.
I do get a chuckle out of the "relevant" question that seems to always pop up. ESPN, CBS, and every other media outlet talk about ND pretty much daily. If they aren't relevant on the field, the B1G, ACC, and BIG XII wouldn't be begging them to join them. They definitely haven't won enough to satisfy any ND fan, but they still have made 3 BCS appearances which I think ranks them around 15th in the country. That isn't good enough and they've had some of the worst seasons in history, but they also aren't an afterthought like Indiana or Pittsburgh.
Clashmore: the Big Ten was begging ND to join before Nebraska came aboard.
It's not clear that's still the case, though, because of the scheduling difficulties in protecting all the old rivalries when 14+ teams are in a conference. I'm not one who believes that super conferences are inevitable, etc. And I wonder if, after people notice the effects of the watered-down schedules in the SEC this year, if that will further highlight the scheduling issue.
My hunch is that the BT and ND should just create a business arrangement with NBC/Fox/BT Network. Both entities could sort of pool some resources without being in the same conference - everyone benefits. Just an idea.
Fido, congrats on saying worse to Michigan fans, something to be proud of in this day and age. I don't read everything on here. As I've already said, I pretty much stick to topics that have a connection to Notre Dame. Yeah, if OSU fans have something constructive to add to the discussion they are welcome on the site I visit. If they come on and post Kelly is a killer and Kelly yells at his players when they make absolutely boneheaded mistakes and nothing more, there is some resistance. There are Michigan and Southern Cal posters that will post there as well and can add to the discussion.
The one liners required as much effort as I wanted to give to the quality of posts I was responding to.
Relevance is an interesting thing, because with Notre Dame I separate relevance on the field from their overall relevance. While Notre Dame has not had great success on the field lately, they still put players in the NFL and they are and will continue to be a national brand. To me they are relevant as a brand and they draw viewers and get hits on websites because of who they are, not because of their play on the field. They are a polarizing team, people either love them or hate them, and talking about them draws people from both sides in. In my opinion conferences want them to join because they are a great school academically and have a national fan base, which again equals viewers and website hits and, most importantly, dollar signs.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPBb2W9GQAg
Seems appropriate for this thread.
I know there's a game saturday, and my ass will be there.
For those of you who have requested a "Notre Dame perspective" Clashmore is giving it to you.
But Kelly did kill a kid....(just trying to ruffle some feathers, all in good fun). But the fact that ESPN, Fox, etc. still talk about ND I think erks people BECAUSE they haven't been relevant (at least not as relevant as the amount of press they get would lead one to believe). People gave the same excuse for Weis, that he "needed to get all of his pieces in place." Same excuse with Rich Rod. Truth is, good coaches adapt to their specific players (while recruiting those ideal ones for their natural system). I think this is a cop-out excuse. I would love ND to become relevant again, it would take press away from the SEC. The fact of the matter is, though, ND has become a place for 4/5* players to die...
Ahh Saturday: point taken.
Clashmore: okay, I concede that I'm a jerk. Will you now remember to respond to my direct question, which was intended to give you a chance to show us how a rational, clue-filled, worthwhile, and mindful comment is supposed to go - Was it Kelly's fault the kid died?
What really irks me about Kelly isn't his temper, it's his lying. He bailed on both CMU and UC after telling his players he wasn't going anywhere; this was especially well-documented when Kelly bailed on the Bearcats.
"Attack the Strong, Trample the Weak, Hurdle the Dead!"
-Former OSU S&C Coach Lichter
No it wasn't his fault. If he had directly told the kid to stay up in the lift, I'd say it was his fault. He was given a weather report that allowed them to be outside. The previous day, the weather report was bad enough that practice was inside. If Kelly was intentionally practicing in poor condiitions the previous day despite the bad weather reports, I would think he was acting negligently. As it was, no.
703, do Urban Meyer and his lies irk you too?
millertime, I disagree with your Weis comment. He had no plan other than thinking he was going to outscheme people because he won Super Bowls. He had 3 different defensive coordinators his last 3 years, all of which played completely different styles. He had offensive linemen losing between 15 and 20 pounds during the course of the season because the emphasis on strength and conditioning wasn't there. He had a defensive lineman play as a true freshman and sophomore that didn't do any kind of lifting with his legs until Kelly arrived. He burned red shirts because he had no idea how to build a program. I don't think many ND fans were saying Weis needed to get his pieces in place. He had 5 years, which is more than enough time to get the roster the way he wanted it.
I love how people always say that Urban lies and never seem to say what those lies are...
The only lies people can cite are the ones that have been disproven by a number of witnesses. But ND is just another butthurt program, offended by success
Only a ND fan would say that the ACC, Big Ten, and Big 12 are "begging" them to join
Clashmore, people were most certainly saying to give weis time to get his own guys. Everyone was saying that he wasn't winning bcs bowls because he was playing with all willingham recruits but to wait until he got his own recruits. If you deny that nd fans were saying that, then you're lying to yourself
I don't doubt that some were saying that. Some still think if he would have been brought back for the 6th year he would have turned everythig around. It doesn't make sense though considering he coached 5 years. His final season was made up completely of players he recruited. The passing game with Clausen and Tate/Floyd was fine. Couldn't run the ball and defense was horrible because it was the third consecutive season with a different DC/scheme. He wasn't making any progress with his guys and the team again faded in November.
JD, you apparently haven't paid much attention to any conference realignment talk the past 3 years, have you?
Clashmore: I give you credit for responding to my question.
Still, I'm puzzled about how this tragic affair was supposedly resolved. It was fully appropriate that ND, the institution, acknowledged that it was responsible for, and therefore negligent in regard to, Sullivan's death. The university settled with the family and paid the State of Indiana $42K in safety violations.
The problem, though, is that no persons ever took responsibility, or were assigned responsibility, for the bad actions. Rather, this abstract corporate-like institutional entity called the University of Notre Dame became the responsible "party," as if the bad actions were committed by intangible forces beyond anyone's control.
The ND investigation concluded that the CEO, Kelly was not responsible because three people who worked under him, who were supposed to provide input concerning weather conditions, safety - Dir. of FB operations, head trainer, video director - did not adequately warn Kelly. The report also concluded those three guys weren't at fault, either, though, because other pre-existing structural factors (including other previous bad decisions) came into play and presumably because their responsibily to inform Kelly was too diffusely delegated among them, causing procedural confusion, etc.
In other words, everyone at ND is responsible and no one at ND is responsible. Welcome to the 21st century.
If you want to call me irrational, clueless, rude for calling Kelly a lowlife, fine. But at least I'm calling him a lowlife instead of boundlessly attributing the quality of lowlife-ness to the abstract idea of ND, an institution which I actually respect quite a lot.
@703: To be fair, @Clashmore is making a valid point about your feelings towards Kelly. When Urban left Bowling Green, Utah, and Florida, he reassured fans, media, and players that he was not leaving. Similar to Kelly, Urban's quotes appeared steadfast but ultimately came a number of days prior to resignation.
Class of 2008
Urban didn't leave Florida "for another job". He left for health concerns, was offered a less stressful job with ESPN and took it, relaxed for a year, and then got back into coaching when he, his doctors, and his family felt that he could manage it and stay healthy.
I'm not sure why we are debating about coaches lying. I believe that ALL coaches lie, tell half-truths, tell people what they want to hear, etc. In my opinion it comes with the territory. None of us should be shocked or surprised by it.
I think one big reason people here don't like Kelly has nothing to do with him being purple faced screaming on the sidelines or the kid dying on his watch(which is a big deal). I think the biggest part of animosity over Brian Kelly is that he coached UC for their 2 good seasons. The 2 seasons where people believed they could be Ohio State etc. People refuse to like him or acknowledge his accomplishments.
I don't like him for how he skipped out on UC. He constantly lobbied for better facilities and for the university to make an investment in his program. He even sold it as do this and you can keep me around. The university put the money into practice facilities. I pretty big investment and takes off right after. He pretty much screwed over UC, and not just because he left.
I really don't think he was the best choice for Notre Dame and I don't neccessarily blame him for taking the job. I do think he was a more accomplished coach than what Michigan hired and so I find it funny that many people here don't think he can win at ND, but they all seem to think Hoke is going to be a formidable foe. Kelly's success was no doubt aided by being in the Big East, but he did take UC to unknown heights. They did lose both their BCS games, but he took a program that was really not very good, a glorified MAC team and made them a BCS team in back to back years. His system put Tony Pike and Marty Gilyard in the NFL.
I don't really think they'll be ultra successful with Kelly, but I don't think he's as bad as the 2 coaches before him.
Scott and TENN, thank you.
@Tenn: I completely agree with your post and only commented on the issue because I felt a double standard was being applied for Coach Kelly and Coach Meyer. Alas, I have contributed to the thread jack.
Class of 2008
JAdams, Pitino and Izzo have been screaming at guys their whole careers, not just since they won chapmionships. Pitino coached a long long time before he ever won a title. Kelly has accomplished pretty much at lower levels. He's only been in the big leagues a couple of years. I'm interested to see if he can make good recruiting translate to good football or not. Even if he doesn't have success, I still don't understand why any of us are shocked about a football coach losing his temper and being an A-hole on the sideline. I always assumed that if you were going to play football it was a foregone conclusion you were going to end up having coaches who threw tantrums on the sideline and yelled at you.
So about Jaylon, any new news?
hmmm, I wonder which coach he could be referring to?
^Has to be Lane Kiffin.
yes, and that would be just fine with me if it was.
That is simply unprofessional...now stocking the campus tour with the best of the best coeds, well...
Has to be Kiffin. Aren't all ND chicks future nuns? /s/
Those who stay will be CHAMPIONS!
~Bo Schembechler
Not Mary!
"Mary, Mary, quite contrary, what makes your garden grow?"
I don't really think any Michigan fan has room to talk regarding the coeds of another school.
Dumb move. The coach had to know that any number of girls wouldn't come close to competing with one Skylar Diggins.
Class of 2008
Scott- FYI: I actually agreed with what you were saying about coaches leaving schools and lying and all. I was also trying to point out the double standard being applied to Kelly vs. Meyer by bringing up the point that all coaches lie, twist the truth, tell half-truths, tell people what they wanna hear etc.
I wonder if Kiffin said to Jaylon (assuming it was Lame Kiffin) within a 20 mile radius of USC campus we have approximately 20,000 girls just waiting to meet you.
hahahahahaha @clashmore just won my heart
Could be Kiffin, could also be any SEC coach-the universities all have football hostesses (and baseball hostesses, and...) Of course, all of the hostesses are pretty. Duh.
In an interview with David Perkins, he reveals where he thinks Jaylon Smith will go:
http://www.osusilverbullet.com/4/post/2012/05/recruit-talk-david-perkins...