I've been out of town with limited access so forgive me if this has been discussed ( I did check recent forum postings), but I feel the Nebraska and Wisconsin hires have been mediocre at best. Wisky may have found Alvarez lite, but I'm not impressed at all with the replacements. I feel both AD's have shown a lack of imagination ( for lack of a better word).  And, going forward, for those who think we don't need the Big 10 to be better, I would point out that if MSU wasn't so highly thought of nationally, we wouldn't be playing Alabama (in my best Keith Jackson voice). The narrative about the Bucks definitely changed after that game. 

Looking for thoughts and better alternatives to the coaches hired. Also, i think Michigan's cautious approach may be better played .