Eleven Warriors

PHONE'S RINGING -- IT'S URBAN ON THE LINE

Football ScheduleBasketball ScheduleForumAboutContact

Chris's blog

Dotting History...Continued

Upon having the chance to rap with upcoming The Game i-dotter Joceyln Smallwood, she had such great depth to her responses that it proved difficult to get her takes into just one front page post without it resembling War and Peace. As such, I didn't want her in-depth takes to be all for naught so I figured continuing this as a Blog Post made sense. 

Continue on for the rest of my interview with the soon-to-be history making sousaphone machine from Upper Arlington...

Walk me through a week in the life of practice leading up to a new halftime show.

For a one week show, which is most of what we do, we start on Monday with challenges and we read the music. Often we will have begun working ahead on a show a little bit the week before. So we’ll do some rehearsing inside and go out and learn a little bit of the drill, or refresh ourselves on it if we learned it the week before.

Tuesday and Wednesday we still do a good deal of music rehearsal inside. The latter half of the week is spent almost exclusively outside on the field learning the drill. We each get a packet of charts which tell us where to go on the field and how to get there. We walk through those from page to page and slowly start to put them together. We’ll go through it counting, then we’ll play recordings of the songs that we make inside during rehearsal over the speakers and do the drill along with the music. Eventually we start doing it with instruments and then we march and play it. While that happens in rehearsal, you’re responsible for memorizing your music for music checks which are on Friday afternoon at Gray Day, our dress rehearsal.

On Friday, we have music checks in which the band plays the songs from memory and the squad leaders walk around and make sure you’re playing it right. Squad leaders do the same thing for the directing staff. We take note of people who mess up or don’t know their music. If you fail a music check, you can appeal to a director which means you go try to play it in front of them. If you can’t do that, then you actually fail. You have three strikes with music checks. Once you fail a third time, you’re dismissed from the band, no questions asked. So, it’s a stressful day. That’s why people spend so much time on their music.

After that KL Row (the sousaphone section) goes to dinner at a restaurant of the i dotters choice. Then we go back to the stadium to polish our horns for the game the next day. Once that’s done you go try to get a couple hours sleep before you do the marathon that is a gameday.

Spending so much time together, is the band a pretty tight knit crew?

Definitely. The band is a family. You spend a large part of every day from mid June until January with these people so you get to know them extremely well. Only people who have been in the band really understand what it’s like. They understand the challenges and the rewards of being in this group, so I think that links us together really well. We have one of the most active alumni groups out of any college marching band in the country, which should give you an idea of how tight knit this group is. Once you’re in this band, you don’t really ever leave. Many of them stay really active in the organization and it’s cool to have that connection.

But as far as the band itself, we experience everything together. We have fun, we fight, laugh, cry do everything with one another. A lot of that happens during two a days at the beginning of the summer. You don’t do anything with what the band calls “real friends.” It’s 100% band all the time and that’s when you begin to get close with the people around you. By the time you’re a senior, you know pretty much everyone and the other people in band are some of your best friends.

What should we know about newly appointed band director Jon Waters? We know he’s a former sousaphone player himself but what can you tell us about his vision for the band and how he goes about coming up with new shows?

Jon is great, I can’t say enough good things about him honestly. He’s the type of person who makes you want to be better at what you’re doing. His passion for this group is something that is unmatched I think. He actually dotted the i against Michigan in 1998, so it’s really awesome to have that connection with him. Every so often he’ll come up to me and remind me how many games are left before Michigan or something like that, which is really special. It’s awesome knowing that I’m part of something that he belongs to.

His vision as far as the band is that we strive for perfection. And it’s not just him, it’s the entire staff, that’s how they see it. We’ll be out on the practice field running through something and they’re constantly telling us how to be better. It could be not lifting your legs high enough or playing something sloppy, but it’s always about improving. We’ll march through something and Jon will send us back to do it again because one person screwed it up. And we all grumble about it, but really it’s that type of attitude which has helped us be so good this year. He also talks a lot about tradition through innovation. I think that’s how he puts it—the idea that what is tradition now was once new. So we do new things, we try them out and we don’t limit ourselves in what we do just because we haven’t done it before.

The big thing with show planning is that it’s a group effort, that’s something I really want to emphasize and something Jon emphasizes too. The planning starts in the spring with a meeting where band members can come in with ideas. They take those ideas and widdle them down to themes for however many home games we have that year. From there, stuff takes off. The arranging staff begins arranging music, our directing staff writes the drill. It’s a huge effort. For the Nebraska video game show for example, that idea had been floating around for a couple years and they decided this year would be a good time to go with it. John Brennan wrote the music, Aaron Bell our percussion instructor did the drum parts, Chris Hoch who is the assistant director wrote the drill (what you see on the field) which was unbelievable. He’s a genius, they all are. And that’s the awesome part. When Chris is up on the tower outside teaching us drill for example, the rest of the staff is down on the field with us helping fix things and answering questions. There is never a moment when they aren’t doing something to help. It’s totally a team effort.

My thanks again to Joceyln for taking the time to meet. It was a sincere pleasure getting to hear her so passionately talk about TBDBITL and her upcoming role in shaping its history. 

 

A Few Thoughts On Hoops Following the Walsh Exhibition

I’m throwing this up as a blog post because I’d rather just type some observations from last night rather than spend a bunch of time packaging it all together. It was an exhibition, after all.

First, as I’m hoping most of you already understand, there’s no need to panic after Ohio State’s unimpressive and basically sluggish 83-71 win last night in front of 9,000 fans in the Schott.

As he should at this point in the season, Thad was focused on getting lots of guys on the floor and using certain combinations to see who gels with whom. From my seat just behind the scorers table this was made abundantly clear as OSU subs were flying to the table in a way you won’t see come January.

I don’t care what anyone, including Thad, says about the supposed depth on this team. I do think he’ll play more than the six to seven guys he typically uses but talk of nine or 10 guys playing regularly is not going to happen. Eight guys are going to see the bulk of the minutes (Craft, Smith, Tank, Q, Amir, Scott, Thompson and Ravenel). Amedeo Della Valle will only carve out a role if he can hit the three on a night when nobody else can. He comes with a basketball IQ but it looked to me like he’s still adjusting to the speed of the game in Columbus. I think he has a future her, I’m just not sure he’ll see the floor in a big game this season unless fouls/injury dictate otherwise.

Regarding the small margin of victory, I think a few things were at play. First, it looked almost as if Thad got in Craft’s ear and told him to slow the tempo to see how the guys played in the half court, especially in the first half, because he knows they can out run/athlete a lot of teams but he doesn’t know what these can do in the half court especially when using a basic motion offense as opposed to set plays. Second, the Buckeyes not only ran very few set plays (many probably aren’t even installed yet) but they also didn’t use the high pick on the wing as much as they normally do to get Craft coming off a screen toward the middle of the floor to initiate the offense. Later in the game, they used a lot of high ball screens and Deshaun took advantage knocking down a hand full of jumpers off the pick and pop.

A few other team items I noticed…

The rebounding was pathetic in general but the offensive rebounding was an embarrassment. The Buckeyes had just nine o-boards and could only muster a 33-33 tie on the  glass overall.

Though the rebounding was garbage, the Buckeyes do have some guys besides Craft that are very strong on-ball defenders. When the Buckeyes did decide to turn up the intensity – ie. the defensive pressure – they went on a 17-3 run to close the half, forcing eight Walsh turnovers on their final 12 possessions.

This team is going to be streaky with the 3’s and has to be careful not become lazily reliant on throwing up shots from outside early in the clock. They shot 15 threes out of 28 total 1st Half field goals last night (making just four) but then took only four treys in the 2nd half. 

Individually…

Craft is Craft. He does so many things that aren’t in the box score. One example is how insanely hard he shadows his man and takes away passing lanes when a fellow defender gets a ‘stick’ (opposing offensive player picks up the ball, losing his dribble).  He did pick up his 3rd foul in not so impressive fashion but that’s nitpicking one of the smartest, toughest players I’ve ever seen at Ohio State.
Instead of spoon feeding Deshaun early, Craft went out of his way to get other players involved and was the only Buckeye not named Sam Thompson that was consistently talking on the defensive end of the floor. He had six assists in 28 minutes and didn’t really look to score at all. The only knock offensively was that he didn’t effectively drive and dish much in this one.

Thomas struggled in the middle portion of the first half, forcing shots and turning it over a couple times on forced passes and/or dribble drives. Excepting about an 8-10 minute stretch, he was pretty damn good helping fuel the end of half run with back to back And-1’s that included OSU’s first offensive board of the night at around the 1:39 mark. Overall, six of his 17 shots were from distance and Thad will probably live with that most nights as long as Thomas can hit around a 38+% clip. Last night he hit just one.

LaQuinton Ross looked like the young player that he is. He looked very good at times and lost at other points. The guy is instantly the most dangerous outside shooter on the team (that will play a lot of minutes anyway) and scored 13 points in 21 minutes. By my count, he really only forced two shots out of nine which isn’t bad when you consider how badly he must be dying to prove he can be a big time scorer.

Ross also pulled down five boards though his overall defense needs work. I like that you can tell he’s really trying to be a solid defensive player but I don’t like how robotic he looked at that end of the floor. He didn’t talk at all – except to himself – almost guiding himself through trying to play helpside defense while keeping his man in his sights. He looked to really be internalizing his defensive effort and the lack of talk kept him from calling out oncoming screens leading to Scott getting blasted once and a few open shots off those unannounced screens. He’s a work in progress but he’s going to play because he can score no matter what Thad says about how a player has to be a great defender to see the floor.

Shannon Scott and Sam Thompson really impressed me at times especially at the defensive end. Scott had an amazing block running back in transition and Thompson had three swats to nobody’s surprise. What I really liked from both these dudes was their on-ball defense. They really hawked the ball and pushed the opposing player (scott especially) far out on the wing. Scott had theWalsh PG initiating the offense 35 feet out on a couple trips. Good stuff.

Scott also showed that solid ability we saw at the end of last year to get in the paint off the bounce and kick out to a spot up shooter. Meanwhile, Thompson is a guy that will continue to look to receive passes off the slash as he did from Craft for a dunk early. He has a poor man’s Lighty vibe going on and his stat line read 11 points, four boards, four dimes and three blocks in 23 minutes. Very strong night for Sam.

Smith only played 19 minutes and didn’t show much with six points and three boards against three turnovers but I’m not worried about him. He’ll be another streaky outside shooter but when it counts, I know he’ll get his ass on the glass and defend his man with a mentality that rest is for the offensive end of the floor.

Down low, Amir got the start but didn’t really show much in 14 minutes other than the known ability to block shots. He had five blocks and the most impressive thing about them was that I think all of them were on his man as opposed to the more conventional block that comes from rotating over to help a teammate. While those on-man blocks were sweet, he got abused in the post more than few times and never seemed to catch on that their man big was left-handed. It was kind of amazing actually that he made no adjustment whatsoever to this fact.

It’s early though so no need to give up on Amir at this point. He’s got a ton of potential as a defensive player and his new frame featuring 30 extra lbs of muscle looks B1G ready. He’s just gotta play smarter and work on his hands. They were stone-ish last night and he’s better than that. He lost a few passes and rebounds just because he didn’t grab the ball and chin it.

Ravenel looked very good and will likely emerge as an unsung hero on this team. He was 5/5 from the floor for 11 points and his moves are fairly fluid. He’s never going to be a superstar but I do think he’s the type of guy – with a lot of experience – that will more easily find and embrace his role than some of the younger guys on a team full of role players save DT and Craft.

Della Valle, as I briefly mentioned up top, has proven at the high school level that he can shoot but even on a team desperate for a consistent three point shooter, he appears to be the odd man out in the rotation at this point. It was just one game but it’s tough to come to this level and immediately grasp the speed of things. He threw two awful passes for turnovers, telegraphing both, and you could tell he knew just as he was letting them go that the ball was about to be going the other way. Physically, he needs to get stronger. If he doesn’t,  he’ll only be of use out on the perimeter because opposing wings in conference would likely bully him to the paint either off the bounce of via post-up.

Trey McDonald is a guy that’s gained some love in the off season for his improvement but in last night’s small sample size, he looked like a guy that will only play if foul trouble dictates it.

Overall, though Thad was down on the effort, I saw a lot to be excited about. All of the young guys are going to continue to get better and that’s the name of the game. Nobody cares how good you are in November. If those guys continue to grow while Smith, Thomas and Craft all take a reasonable step forward, there’s no reason this team can’t make some noise come March.

Rod Smith's Fumbles

This topic was brought up in the comments of Five Things and since it took a few minutes to research, I thought I'd share Rod Smith's fumbling history for those that might be interested since he put the ball on the ground again at Indiana.

2011 Season: 29 carries, 2 fumbles

  • Game 1: Akron - 18 carries, 1 fumble
  • Game 2: Toledo - 7 carries, 1 fumble
  • Game 4: Colorado - 4 carries, 0 fumble
  • He didn't carry it one time after Colorado.

2012 Season: 20 carries, 2 fumbles

  • Game 1: Miami - 3 carries, 0 fumble
  • Game 2: UCF - 3 carries, 1 fumble
  • Game 4: UAB - 4 carries, 0 fumble
  • Game 6: Nebraska - 2 carries, 0 fumble
  • Game 7: Indiana - 6 carries, 1 fumble

Career: 49 carries, 4 fumbles

Basically, if he were a workhorse back averaging 25 carries a game, he'd have fumbled twice each in those two games. Now, of course, he hasn't been a workhorse back and it could be argued getting into a flow carrying the ball might actually decrease his propensity to fumble but it's a chicken/egg conundrum. It's hard to sign up for giving the guy multiple carries when he track record says he's gonna cough it up once every 12 carries. With Hyde on a roll, Rod might only have kickoff returns to show he can hold on to the ball for awhile.

 

How Many Years Left for the Jackets?

The Dispatch published a report today claiming the Jackets lost $25mil in the 2010-11 season, their 10th in the NHL. I remember telling Jason when the franchise was born that I'd be shocked if they made it 10 years in this town. While they aren't gone yet, I'm struggling to see how they make it in Columbus 5-10 more years. That said, I'm not a big hockey/CBJ fan by any stretch (though I'd hate to see them go) so I'm curious what the rest of you think. Will the CBJ survive in Columbus? If not, how many more years before they relocate/contract?

I guess the good news is the team doesn't appear to be on the verge of cutting payroll and we all know cities will support a winner.

Underachievers? Disappointment? Both? Neither?

So, I've caught a little bit of feedback for labeling this team an "underachieving disappointment" in the game recap.

I feel I tried to clarify how I feel about this team and I truly don't feel the comment was an emotional knee-jerk response as I tried to summarize the game that ended hopes of a national title. Clearly, I'm aware of what this team accomplished by winning the regular and postseason conference titles. In no way am I trying to diminish the accomplishments of this team. I have stated on a few occassions that they are my favorite collection of players in hoops ever since I started following the Buckeyes. I'm 37.

For me, I guess maybe I get too caught up in the end result of sport. I stand behind my comment, though it was beyond without malice, because I felt early in the year this team was capable of winning it all. Then as the season unfolded, it became clear they were the best team in the land. Finally, they were awarded the #1 overall seed by the committee and nobody in America questioned that distinction.

So, the question is, considering what the team accomplished versus what they didn't - failing to get out of the Sweet 16 as the #1 overall seed - do you feel this team underachieved? Do you feel the end result was a disappointment? Do you think both? Do you think neither?

Why do you feel the way you do? I'm extremely curious to see what some well thought out responses to this look like.

11W Tickets Powered by TiqIQ
GameTime Salsa

ADVERTISE HERE

That's Why I'm Here by Chris Spielman

Urban's Way by Buddy Martin
Support 11W by Shopping at Amazon
Eleven Warriors Dry Goods