
It's hard to imagine Virginia Tech without Frank Beamer. Prior to his arrival in 1987 (!), the Hokies won more than 8 games in a season just twice in the entire twentieth century. Since 1999, they have finished with 10 or more victories nine times, dominated the (admittedly maligned, and perhaps fairly so) Atlantic Coast Conference, and set up the sort of program-wide consistency most of the college football world wishes it had.
Beamer and Jim Tressel are kindred spirits, if not mirror images. Shocker of shockers, their teams are rather similar too: both feature mobile quarterbacks, talent and depth at the running back position, an experienced set of WRs, an iffy-but-stable offensive line, and defenses that, while perhaps not among the school's greatest in history, figure to be top-15 units in rushing, passing and total D to finish the year. Any game featuring these two teams would likely be decided by 10 points or less. While they might not be the big SEC bull Ohio State needs to wrangle to get back in the media's good graces, Tech looks formidable in 2010.
Offense
Frank Beamer is so adept at ripping off Jim Tressel's schtick that he even has his own much maligned offensive coordinator in Brian Stinespring. Take it away,
Dr. Saturday:
[Stinespring] seems perfectly content to grind away with one of the most pedestrian attacks in the country as long as the defense holds up its end of the bargain – see 2007 and 2008, in particular, back-to-back ACC championship seasons for the Hokies despite offenses that ranked 100th and 103rd, respectively, in total yards.
As DocSat ably explains in that piece, there's a good chance this is Virginia Tech's most stacked offense talent-wise since the heady days of Michael Vick in 1999. Tech is blessed with two great running backs: Darren Evans was a 1,200 yard rusher in 2008, but injury forced him to sit out the 2009 season. In comes redshirt freshman Ryan Williams, who didn't break a sweat in rushing for
1,600 yards, setting all sorts of freshman records for the Hokies on his way to
21 touchdowns. Tyrod Taylor has come along as a passer since a miserable sophomore season, but he has roughly as much - if not more - to prove than Terrelle Pryor in his last season as a Hokie. If he can become a consistent passer, Tech goes from probable ACC champ to serious title contender, right alongside the Buckeyes and the Tide.
Defense
Things are actually a tad shaky for Tech on defense heading into 2010: they lose leading tackler Cody Grimm, sack leader Nekos Brown, and multi-year starter Kam Chancellor. Two key players return, however: solid ILB Barquell Rivers and Rashad Carmichael, who snatched six interceptions in 2009. Given that Tech has finished in the top-15 in total defense in each of the last six years, it's doubtful that such attrition will mean much in the long run.
How do they match up with the Buckeyes?
Offensively, they're strong where we're strong, and weak where we're weak. Unless Taylor turns the corner as a passer, Tech's passing game should leave the relatively-vulnerable Ohio State secondary untested, but containing Williams, Evans and Taylor on the ground will be a challenge for any defense. Offensively, Ohio State might have enough talent at wide receiver to give Tech's secondary and linebackers difficulty from spread looks, but the run blocking would have to come up big - far bigger than it did in the Rose Bowl - for Ohio State to establish any consistency on offense.
The Schedule
| Date |
Opponent |
| September 6th |
Boise State |
| September 11th |
James Madison |
| September 18th |
East Carolina |
| September 25th |
@ Boston College |
| October 2nd |
@ NC State |
| October 9th |
Central Michigan |
| October 21th |
Wake Forest |
| October 30th |
Duke |
| November 4th |
Georgia Tech |
| November 13th |
@ UNC |
| November 20th |
@ Miami |
| December 4th |
Virginia |
As I said, it's relatively rough, even with cupcake James Madison in the second week. The game against Boise State might be a home game, but I'm bullish on the Broncos, as you all know. East Carolina, of course,
actually beat the Hokies just two years ago. Still, things don't get really tricky again until the game at Boston College, and after that, it's essentially a month-long break until murderer's row: Georgia Tech at home, then UNC and Miami on the road. The Yellow Jackets beat Tech at home last year, while UNC pulled off a miracle in Blacksburg, so neither game would be a particularly surprising loss. Miami is a top-15 outfit this year as well. So in the end, Tech is also a mirror image in terms of its schedule: a big non-conference outing followed by a few games against patsies, one big conference game as we approach the middle of the season (Wisconsin for us, BC for VT) and a solid set of teams to end the season (for Ohio State: PSU, Iowa and Michigan).
Can it happen?
If it happens, it'll have to be in the title game. With the new tie-in agreements, the Big Ten has no postseason
sparring contests with the ACC (gotta save all that pent-up energy for The Challenge, amirite?). Thus, both teams will have to run the table. I don't consider this particularly likely. I think Virginia Tech will drop one before the season is over. Of course it
could happen, but it might be the least likely title game scenario involving Ohio State outside of perhaps their opening week foes from Boise.
Why am I excited?
Because, as I have already shown, these teams have a lot in common. Beamer and Tressel have had a lot of success, but still aren't always recognized as top-5 college coaches for their relatively minor failures. One would have another failure to add to his list if he loses a game likes this sure, but a clash of two teams so alike in nature usually results in an instant classic.
Why am I not enthused?
Because Tech, like Oklahoma and Ohio State, has a nagging reputation for big game flops. While I doubt we'll care if we win, the win would likely be downplayed as best it could be nationally (as would also likely happen for a win over Boise State, as many of you aptly pointed out). Still, a MNC's a MNC, and there are few teams in the country that would make as great a foil for the Buckeyes as Virginia Tech would.
Comments
Tech is gonna be pretty good this year, Taylor reminds me of Pryor in a lot of ways, and you are spot on with your write up.
One point I would like to make is even though James Madison is 1-AA, they are still a pretty damn good team, expected to contend and maybe win a RNC. (RNC= Real Nat'l Championship since they have a playoff).
Great post!
Taylor is a MUCH better passer then people say............ I saw this kid play HS & my son plays with him now at VT...
I'm going out on a limb and saying if Ohio State makes it to the title game, they will not be playing an SEC team. Bama will lose this year. Florida will not run the table, and after that there are so teams with talent, but no one I can point to and say they are going to make it through with fewer than 2 losses. So, my prediction is, they don't get the monkey off their back, and they'll be playing Boise State. That way people will really rip Ohio State for winning a championship.
As for the poll: I would rather play Nebraska. Big Ten title games will forever be rematches!
Worilds turned pro early and was drafted by the Steelers. Rivers will miss the start of practice and likely the Boise State game due to a torn quad suffered in early March.
I liked reading this. The Beamer-Tress comparisons were right on.
Correction made. Thanks for the insights, man.
I don't care much who we play as long as the Buckeyes are there. I would least like Ohio State to play Boise State.
Anybody but them.
It'll be just their luck lol. I don't think Boise gets past Va Tech personally, but people have been telling me I'm wrong. If Nebraska can figure out things on the offensive side of the ball I can see them making it. I just am not sold on Bama like everyone else is.
Williams actually ran for 21 touchdowns, not 11 last year, and not only set freshman records, but Tech and ACC all-time records. And also, yes, Taylor sometimes struggles as a passer, but by-and-large he has already turned the corner with his performance last year. He needs to improve his accuracy, but he became a MUCH improved decision maker last year. He worked well within the Tech offense, but if you're underwhelmed by his lackluster stats, just know that he is not asked to do much in the way of passing, and so his lack of opportunities in that department directly factor into his stats. And especially don't underestimate the receivers. They are so solid that I think by the time they graduate, they will have cemented themselves as the best class of receivers in Tech's history.
i think we only get respect when we beat someone from the SEC.
I firmly believe that the way out is through and nothing would be more gratifying than a MNC victory over an SEC team. That being said, nothing does better to block a barrage of lack of media respect than sticking a few crystal footballs in your ears. A MNC is a MNC.
Our first bowl game against an SEC team was the 1977 Sugar Bowl against Bama. Can I get verification that that game was orchestrated solely to get Woody (we were #9 in the AP) against Bear (they were #3)?
I love this site and comments, but us facing a non-SEC team in the NC game is a pipe dream. An SEC team would have to lose 3 games before that even gets discussed. Throw in the ACCs horrible reputation (worst than B10) and I'm not sure why this blog about V-Techis even relevent. Simply put, IF we make the NC game, we MUST face and beat an SEC team. V-Tech can go undefeated with that schedule and not make the NC game. That's how much clout the SEC has right now.
I have to admit, I'm a little perplexed by all this "we MUST beat an SEC team" stuff. Isn't a championship a championship? I understand a win over an SEC squad would make it all the more sweet, but... who cares about the critics when you just won a national championship? On the day after, will you really care who it came against? Seems a little nitpicky to me. I'd like a title, won against the best possible team, regardless of conference.
I concur, a win is a win - I don't see how a 3 loss SEC squad (say, a Bama or a UF) could lay claim to the #2 spot over a team from a "major" conference, ala a VaTech. Boise St. is another matter all together, but any team from a BCS conference that goes undefeated will very likely get in. We can only assume that given the Hokies run the table, their win over Boise will look pretty good (at least to the computers) when Boise themselves run the table after said loss to VaTech. In summary, Boise State (no matter how cute their little cheeks are and how much you just wanna pinch 'em gosh darn it) in the MNC game is probably a pipe dream, but a VaTech squad that runs the table? Given the SEC takes care of itself, they're in. And looking at T-Pain and T-Taylor head to head, as of before they go to camp and any games are played to see who did their homework this summer, I have to give the nod to our guy - Taylor appears to have some inflated stats against weak competition, and in the tougher games did not really shine IMO. Given a lead of any kind in this match up, the pressure we can put on Taylor could earn us that MNC we will be chomping at the bit all season to attain, given we are able to get any kind of significant lead in a head to head match up of "who has the suckiest O-coordinartor." Of course, I kid Bolls, no, really, I love you, deep down, somewhere in there.
I think Boise State is getting a LOT of respect. Some pre-season polls have them at #2. If they're already that high, it would take much to get into the MNC if they win all their games.
I just would prefer Ohio State play someone else, if it came down to it because you know darn well the SEC rednecks would be hollerin' about it. We'd have to beat Boise by 90 points to be legit in their eyes. That ain't going to happen with Tressel ball.
Will Ohio State ever get respect from the SEC? No. If we were to beat an SEC team for 10 straight national titles, there would be no shortage of excuses as to why they didn't win. In the SEC mind, there is no other league and Vandy would win the Big Ten every single year.
That being said, a national title would give Ohio State national props (outside of Jim Bob country, of course) regardless of whom they beat. Would I rather beat Florida than Boise for a title? Of course, but as said before, a title is a title.
poguetowngray, what's your call for the final score of Boise - Tech?
As recently as three years ago and SEC team backed in with 2 losses. I can see the SEC champ having 2 losses this year. If say Ohio State and Nebraska or Oklahoma both go undefeated, and an SEC champ has 2 losses, no way that 2 loss SEC champion gets the nod over an undefeated Ohio State and Big 12 school. I'd go so far as to say a 1 loss SEC champ wouldn't get in over two undefeateds from the Big 12 and Big 10.
I think Tech will enjoy a sizable home field advantage, so 28-21? I'd go with Boise on a more neutral field.
umm, its at FedEx field in Maryland
Landover, Maryland is not even a half hour away from Northern Virginia, which is where a ton of Hokie alumni are from.
Great writeup. Best I've seen from a non-VT writer. There are no doubt a lot of similarities between our coaches and teams. We're looking forward to coming to see you guys here in a couple years. As for the Boise game, FedEx field will be 7 to 1 Hokie fans. It's about 5 hours from campus, but right in the heart of Hokie alumni country in the metro DC area. Should end up around 70k+ VT fans and around 10k Boise fans from what I'm hearing of ticket sales so far. Essentially a home game for us.
they both suck