
As expected, there weren't any fireworks or "I'm a man, I'm forty" diatribes from Coach Tressel in yesterday's presser. Also as expected, the Vest didn't offer up much useful information as he reflected back on the, as Corey called it, the Crapper in the Coliseum.
Showing he hasn't lost his sense of humor, Tressel jokingly referenced the city's electricity problems with regard to reviewing game tape:
Everyone have their power back? I asked that question in the team meeting yesterday thinking four or five of them would say we don't. I'd say 75% of them had their hand up that they don't have power. Oh, well, that's why we're here, I guess. I was hoping on Sunday when we got back to watch the film the power would be out, but it wasn't, but, no.
Rightfully, Tress gave USC the props they deserved and discussed the fact that players, coaches and fans should expect that OSU be the best and therefore be unhappy when results are less than the best. With that, he cited penalties and turnovers as key killers to any hopes of escaping victorious last Saturday:
Obviously penalties. There's no way that you can back yourself up when you're playing against Southern Cal's defense. Southern Cal's defense is excellent, and when you throw a touchdown, you can't have a penalty. A couple plays before that, when you throw a route that gets us down to the 2 yard line, you can't have a penalty. Earlier in the game at the end of the 15-play drive, which I'm not sure how many 15-play games there will be against Southern Cal this year, but at the end of the 15-play drive, you can't have a couple 5-yard penalties. So first and foremost, you have to be penalty-free. Obviously if you're going to stay in the battle and the fray and the toe-to-toe and go the full round with Southern Cal, you can't have turnovers, especially turnovers for touchdowns.
The most exciting news came with the already posted revelation that Pryor will see the majority of snaps with the ones in practice and he'll likely see 50% of the game snaps against Troy assuming he doesn't stink it up in practice as the week progresses:
We said if we had a game last night with what we were planning to do, that we envisioned that it would be 50/50, but it will be affected by what we do in practice, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, and obviously what occurs during the course of the game.
It doesn't appear that Tressel expects Pryor to do anything but enhance his chances of seeing more game action due to his innate ability to improve with limited practice snaps - ie. he seems to truly learn from watching:
I think what's been impressive to me about Terrelle is if you take the 20 some preseason practices, Todd probably had 50% of the snaps, Terrelle had 25%, and so did Joe Bauserman. And then you move into the games, Todd probably had 75% of the snaps in the first game and the other two guys shared 25%, and then in the OU game, Todd probably had what, 95% of the snaps, yet Terrelle has progressed with the lack of snaps in practice and the game more than you think he would. I've seen a freshman get kind of thrown into the fire and grow every practice and grow every game because he got so much experience. I've seen him grow with a little bit less experience, which means he's done a good job of learning by observing, which is the hardest thing for a player to do. Most guys when they're standing outside the lineup, I have two right in the front row that, they're not thinking solely about what they can learn. Now, these guys probably did. But that's been impressive to me about Terrelle is he's had limited snaps, yet considerable improvement.
Tressel went on to talk about how well Pryor handled the atmosphere and that even though Camp Randall will pose a greater challenge, he's not worried about TP from a hostile environment perspective. I'm not sure I'm convinced of that simply because the Coliseum is not a loud, intimidating stadium but I'm convinced Tressel will give TP plenty of opportunities in road venues.
On the injury front, Tressel offered updates on Beanie as well as Rehring and Denlinger, if you're interested:
I think Steve will be out. I think we'd get Andrew Miller back in. Todd Denlinger will give us more time, I think he only got in a snap or two Saturday. Who else was out? Well, Beanie right now is listed as questionable by the medical staff. He did all of the cardio and straight line and all that stuff yesterday. Today will be the day where he has to go back and do all the cutting and all those kinds of things and that's where we got our setback last week, so we'll have to see how that goes, but we'll update that day-to-day.
To further clarify Beanie's status when asked if he would heal without needing surgery, Tressel made it clear surgery wasn't in the forecast:
That's what I've been told, yeah. Have I studied the MRI like Coach Bruce when he used to do the x-rays? No. That's out of my league. But from what I've been told, absolutely.
Expounding on what will happen with Rehring out, Tressel indicated some of the kids will indeed see more time:
We went two different ways at the end of the game went Bryant Browning into guard and Jamie Shugarts at tackle and went Andrew Miller into guard. We did both those things yesterday. Michael Brewster had some time at guard. We only ran about a dozen plays as a team yesterday, but I think that might have been the combinations that were in.
Sticking with the offensive line, he did offer some curious comments about the play of Boone and Person, among others. Not sure if I agree with this stuff, but I'm just some doofus with high speed internet:
I thought that Ben Person played better Saturday than he did his first two games, was my opinion. I thought Alex Boone played fairly well, I don't know that he was extraordinary. But I thought he played fairly well. Of course Bryant Browning had to play a couple different positions. Jimmy Cordle had tough duty. They lined up in that defense, double legal, the guy on the nose the entire game, and that's tough duty, but he fought and he made some errors and got thrown around a play or two where he wasn't able to stay on and sustain, but I haven't heard any discussions of -- but it's a little bit uplifting to hear someone say that there's something that we ought to be talking about other than who the quarterback should be because it isn't that simple in this world.
Tressel did spend some time talking about the playcalling and the fact USC players went out of there way to say OSU did nothing that wasn't expected based on film study. A snippet:
That's kind of a typical response when you win, is that, man, things went just the way we planned them and we knew they were going to do that blitz and this and that and we knew that Southern Cal was going to do what they were doing, we didn't execute against it. So is that concerning? I don't think you can blow it off and say, are we tipping someone off or this and that, or do we have a tendency to zone blitz at this time or whatever, but you're really a good team when they know what you're in and they can't do anything about it. That's when you become the best.
I think I hit the key highlights. Again, if you want to read the full transcript click here.






Comments
"That’s kind of a typical response when you win, is that, man, things went just the way we planned them and we knew they were going to do that blitz and this and that and we knew that Southern Cal was going to do what they were doing, we didn’t execute against it. So is that concerning? I don’t think you can blow it off and say, are we tipping someone off or this and that, or do we have a tendency to zone blitz at this time or whatever, but you’re really a good team when they know what you’re in and they can’t do anything about it. That’s when you become the best."
That comment right there concerns me. So I guess were all going to see the same shitty zone ,That has got us beat over and over again.
Thank you lord.... it appears that Tressel has gotten the message beaten into his head ala the Troy smith/Justin Zwick controversy of a few years ago. It took a loss to Texas to get close to the pinnacle... lets all be optomistic here. Tress/Bollman/Daniels need to turn Terrelle loose and let him do his thing. Troy (Alabama) has a very potent offense and OSU is going to have to score some points to win.... long drives and big chunks of yards work as another form of defense because it keeps them off the field........ but you have to score TD's to finish a 9 minute drive (see USC).
http://www.dispatch.com/live/c...
Tress seems like he might be a stubborn guy reluctant to embrace staff or playbook changes, with one exception, that being Pryor.
Is it just me or has anybody else noticed how we used to throw a few wrinkles into the game plan for big games and Michigan, and we don't seem to do that as much now. And we also seem to be making little to no halftime adjustments. Both I think are contributing factors to us losing big games. Or am I crazy?
Hard to know from a presser what JT is really thinking. he's not the kind of guy to come out and say "we got taken to the woodshed and we have to evaluate everything we're doing because we are losing the biggest games on the biggest stage with frightening consistency." that's just not his way.
but we are horribly predictable, very vanilla and we can't block. if that's what you're seeing and thinking Kyle - "do not adjust your set." it's not you.
You're not crazy, Kyle. I have often been wondering that myself... It seemed that, during Tressel's first few years, he used to scheme like Woody did. Spend part of each practice on stuff only to be run against M!ch*g@n. And wehn the time came, you were prepared for them and had wrinkles for them that they never saw coming. And of most note: those wrinkles pretty much all worked.
But now, you get the sense that this sort of planning for big games isn't being done. On top of that, technique and preparation seems to be severely lacking. Add to that the distinct lack of adjustments that there seems to be during games, and it all adds up to several national TV embarassments...
Just a couple errors.......
"J.B. Shugarts" - not Jaimie
"Double Eagle" - not double 'legal'
I've got to think that as far as wrinkles go, it's difficult to tell your players, who have difficulty executing even the most basic plays right now, to do something more complicated. Just my opinion.
the actual transcript from the university listed jamie shugarts in place of jb
Perspective here folks... again, I love JT. I think JT brought a new way of doing business to OSU and Michigan just happened to be in decline--- that was more of the reason that we are 7-1 since JT. What seems to be lacking since 2002-2005 is the killer instinct. Our Defense of '02 and '03 kicked people's asses plain and simple. D'antonio seems to be a bigger loss than most people realized (myself included). Our offense of those years executed the fundamentals of the game to perfection and showed patience and discipline (see personal fouls vs Florida, LSU, USC ) ----that is how we pulled off 5 or 6 games that were within 7 points in the 4th and won 2 OT games in '02.
Our fundamentals stink and our players are losing their composure at the slightest adversity?? Why?? A TD called back on a penalty... 2 penalties when we are on the 5. If those don't happen we are likely up or tied at the half--- so Tress is right about that. The wrinkles are nice if players are executing, but if they are not how can the coaching staff use them?? Motivation and composure seem to be a major flaw here--- teams know that if they hit us in the mouth we are going to lose our cool. Tress needs to address those facts first and fix it before the season spirals out of control. If the leaders can't lead, then find new leaders. If the starters are resting on their reputations instead of busting their asses, then get new starters... no one is off limits... Animal, Boeckman, etc...... JT's gotta find a way to motivate everyone and get them hungry again.
I just read an interesting stat...the Buckeyes rank 74th in sacks (1.33 per game) in Division 1A. That's 4 total sacks this year! They rank 105th for sacks allowed (3 per game). PATHETIC!! This is a reflection on the offensive and defensive lines. There needs to be improvement on both sides of the ball, pronto.
I think we saw some things against USC like the flares to Small and the inside screen to Boom. IMO they finally called some of the stuff we've been asking for but there were too many other problems.
Tom you make a great point on getting the fundamentals right before you worry about trick plays or new plays or formations, but Jesus Christ isn't this team chock full of seniors and juniors? Are you telling me they forgot how to tackle, block, etc?
Bottom line is our offensive and defensive line play (factor out Gholston who is just a freak of nature) has been lackluster since 2002.
Beanie Wells has masked the shitty play of our o-line and when we can't just give it to Beanie (i.e. FL, USC, LSU, IL) Todd freaks out because he doesn't have good protection and fumbles, gets sacked, or throws it away.
I'm frankly amazed Laurinaitis can be as effective as he is with lack of a pass rush from our defensive tackles. Nearly every play he has to shed blocker to make a tackle. Can we get at least one big mean and nasty DT who can create problems in the backfield?
I agree Kyle, I hear you on the little to no halftime adjustments. I feel this is a serious problem.
Against Florida nothing was done at halftime, same with USC. Except for Wisconsin in '07, can anyone recall a game within the last 2 or 3 years that we have come back to win?? (Dont give me Ohio) It seems every game in which we trail, we lose.
I realize our football team is not built to score points in bunchs, especially when we are down, however the lack of ability to post a comeback when we are down or struggling (Ill last year) tough team has to be a reflection on lack of ability to make in game adjustments.
NYC--
OSU was behind 7-3 at Washington last year and came back after the half and scored 30 unanswered points..... Washington got a cheap TD in the 4th... for a 33-14 win. The staff made good adjustments at the half and most importantly the team was pissed off that they were losing and kicked Locker and the boyz in the nutz....
Mitch that is a good example, but I think we could all agree that UW was an inferior opponent. To NYC's point, when is the last time we came back against a quality opponent? I couldn't tell you.
If I am remember right, we came from behind against m*ch*g*n in 2005 on the road. We weren't ever down by too much that game but it was still a come from behind win. That's the only one I can remember.
Kyle:
OSU was down 14-10 last year right after the half and came back to win big...... again they were pissed off and kicked the badgers asses in the 4th... that is what has not been consistent... it seems that the desire to win is lacking at times and that is what did Coop in. I am not saying that Tress is Coop (far from it, than Goodness), but he had better correct this issue before the problem destroys the program. I am not saying that it has gotten to that point yet, and I think he can correct it if he really wants to-- but I sense he is hesitant to do what is called for. That is shake up the coaching staff and shake up the leaders on this team. Tress is slow to react (one of the few faults I have seen) but he does react and will react.
Mitch G:
Wisconsin yes, thats the only example I could come up with. Washington/Ohio do not qualify as quality opponents. Those are teams we should never be trailing to to being with...lol